Literature DB >> 26043759

Proper muscle layer damage affects ulcer healing after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Yohei Horikawa1, Nobuya Mimori1, Hiroya Mizutamari1, Yuhei Kato1, Kazuhiro Shimazu1, Masayuki Sawaguchi2, Shin Tawaraya2, Kimihiro Igarashi3, Syunji Okubo1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the established therapy for superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms. However, management of the artificial ulcers associated with ESD has become important and the relationship between ulcer healing factors and treatment is still unclear. We aimed to evaluate ESD-related artificial ulcer reduction ratio at 4 weeks to assess factors associating with ulcer healing after ESD that may lead to optimal treatment.
METHODS: Between January 2009 and December 2013, a total of 375 lesions fulfilled the expanded criteria for ESD. We defined ulcer reduction rate <90% as (A) poor-healing group; and rate ≥90% as (B) well-healing group. After exclusion, 328 lesions were divided into two groups and analyzed. These two groups were compared based on clinicopathological/endoscopic features, concomitant drugs, and treatment.
RESULTS: Ulcer reduction rate was significantly correlated with factors related to the ESD procedure (i.e. procedure time, submucosal fibrosis, and injury of the proper muscle layer, in univariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that submucosal fibrosis (F2) (P = 0.03; OR, 16.46; 95% CI, 1.31-206.73) and injury of the proper muscle layer (P = 0.01; OR, 4.27; 95% CI, 2.04-8.92) were statistically significant predictors of delayed healing.
CONCLUSION: This single-center retrospective study indicated that ESD-induced artificial ulcer healing was affected by submucosal fibrosis and injury of the proper muscle layer, which induced damage to the muscle layer. Therefore, the preferable pharmacotherapy can be determined on completion of the ESD procedure.
© 2015 The Authors Digestive Endoscopy © 2015 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD); pharmacotherapy; proper muscle layer injury; ulcer healing; ulcer reduction ratio

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26043759     DOI: 10.1111/den.12501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Endosc        ISSN: 0915-5635            Impact factor:   7.559


  5 in total

1.  Effectiveness of fibrin sealant as hemostatic technique in accelerating ESD-induced ulcer healing: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Qi Wu; Yan Yan; Shi-Jie Li; Peng Yuan; Chang-Qi Cao; Dong-Feng Niu; Zi-Yu Li; Zhao-De Bu; Jia-Fu Ji
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Updated evidence on endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer from Japan.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Fujishiro; Shuntaro Yoshida; Rie Matsuda; Akiko Narita; Hiroharu Yamashita; Yasuyuki Seto
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  Effect of ilaprazole on the healing of endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced gastric ulcer: randomized-controlled, multicenter study.

Authors:  Chang Seok Bang; Woon Geon Shin; Seung In Seo; Min Ho Choi; Hyun Joo Jang; Se Woo Park; Sea Hyub Kae; Young Joo Yang; Suk Pyo Shin; Gwang Ho Baik; Hak Yang Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Severity of gastric mucosal atrophy affects the healing speed of post-endoscopic submucosal dissection ulcers.

Authors:  Taketo Otsuka; Mitsushige Sugimoto; Hiromitsu Ban; Toshiro Nakata; Masaki Murata; Atsushi Nishida; Osamu Inatomi; Shigeki Bamba; Akira Andoh
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2018-05-16

5.  Comparison of the Efficacy of Polaprezinc Plus Proton Pump Inhibitor and Rebamipide Plus Proton Pump Inhibitor Treatments for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection-induced Ulcers.

Authors:  Da Hyun Jung; Jun Chul Park; Yong Chan Lee; Sang Kil Lee; Sung Kwan Shin; Hyunsoo Chung; Jae Jun Park; Jie-Hyun Kim; Young Hoon Youn; Hyojin Park
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.174

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.