Literature DB >> 26043073

Conceptualizing the use of public involvement in health policy decision-making.

Kathy K Li1, Julia Abelson2, Mita Giacomini2, Damien Contandriopoulos3.   

Abstract

The concept of public involvement use is not well-defined in the literature. Previous research studies have provided brief accounts of how public involvement may influence health policy, but have not detailed the internal dynamics and process through which it is actually used in the policy process. The study objective is to examine and clarify the concept and process of public involvement use in health policy decision-making. Using qualitative concept analysis methods, we reviewed the literature on the use of public involvement and conducted semi-structured interviews with key informants who have theoretical and/or practical insights on public involvement and its use in policy decision-making. Our findings are organized around interrelated questions that animate how the concept of use is understood, interpreted, and operationalized. In asking, "How is 'use' perceived in relation to health policy decision-making?" meanings are constructed for the concept by identifying differences and drawing connections between "use" and related terms. In asking "How would one know if public involvement was used in health policy decision-making?" our findings weigh in on the act of listening as a precursor to use, the ways in which use is mediated, and responses to the input obtained from public involvement processes as signals of use. These findings are a first step toward improving conceptual clarity about what public involvement use means, how it is understood and interpreted by relevant actors in the public involvement and public policy fields, and how it might be operationalized. We expect our findings to be particularly useful for public involvement practitioners who are often confronted with questions from public involvement participants regarding how their input will be used in health policy decision-making.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Concept analysis; Government; Health policy research; Influence; Policy decision-making; Policy-making; Public involvement; Use

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26043073     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  14 in total

1.  Attendance to cervical cancer screening among Roma and non-Roma women living in North-Western region of Romania.

Authors:  Trude Andreassen; Adriana Melnic; Rejane Figueiredo; Kåre Moen; Ofelia Şuteu; Florian Nicula; Giske Ursin; Elisabete Weiderpass
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Sharpening the focus: differentiating between focus groups for patient engagement vs. qualitative research.

Authors:  Nicole Doria; Brian Condran; Leah Boulos; Donna G Curtis Maillet; Laura Dowling; Adrian Levy
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2018-06-25

3.  Involving patients and the public in medical and health care research studies: An exploratory survey on participant recruiting and representativeness from the perspective of study authors.

Authors:  Jonas Lander; Holger Langhof; Marie-Luise Dierks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Parental perspectives on retention and secondary use of neonatal dried bloodspots: a Dutch mixed methods study.

Authors:  Marleen E Jansen; Lion J M van den Bosch; Marjolein J Hendriks; Mariska M J Scheffer; Marie-Louise Heijnen; Conor M W Douglas; Carla G van El
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.125

5.  Developing a typology of the roles public contributors undertake to establish legitimacy: a longitudinal case study of patient and public involvement in a health network.

Authors:  Jacqueline Barker; Pam Moule; David Evans; Wendy Phillips; Nick Leggett
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Conceptualizing and Counting Discretionary Utilization in the Final 100 Days of Life: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Paul R Duberstein; Michael Chen; Michael Hoerger; Ronald M Epstein; Laura M Perry; Sule Yilmaz; Fahad Saeed; Supriya G Mohile; Sally A Norton
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 3.612

7.  Developing a conceptual model for the application of patient and public involvement in the healthcare system in Iran.

Authors:  Mohammad Azmal; Ali Akbari Sari; Abbas Rahimi Foroushani; Batoul Ahmadi
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2016-06-25

8.  Patient, carer and public involvement in major system change in acute stroke services: The construction of value.

Authors:  Christopher McKevitt; Angus I G Ramsay; Catherine Perry; Simon J Turner; Ruth Boaden; Charles D A Wolfe; Naomi J Fulop
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Synthesising conceptual frameworks for patient and public involvement in research - a critical appraisal of a meta-narrative review.

Authors:  David Evans; Noreen Hopewell-Kelly; Michele Kok; Jo White
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Collaborative accountability for sustainable public health: A Korean perspective on the effective use of ICT-based health risk communication.

Authors:  Taejun David Lee; Hyojung Park; Junesoo Lee
Journal:  Gov Inf Q       Date:  2019-01-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.