Literature DB >> 26042627

Comparing physicians personal prevention practices and their recommendations to patients.

Pavel Atanasov, Britta L Anderson, Joanna Cain, Jay Schulkin, Jason Dana.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hypothetical choice studies suggest that physicians often take more risk for themselves than on their patient's behalf.
OBJECTIVE: To examine if physicians recommend more screening tests than they personally undergo in the real-world context of breast cancer screening.
DESIGN: Within-subjects survey. PARTICIPANTS: A national sample of female obstetricians and gynecologists (N = 135, response rate 54%) from the United States. In total, they provided breast care to approximately 2,800 patients per week. MEASURES: Personal usage history and patient recommendations regarding mammography screening and breast self-examination, a measure of defensive medicine practices.
RESULTS: Across age groups, female physicians were more likely to recommend mammography screening than to have performed the procedure in the past 5 years (86% vs. 81%, p = .10). In respondents aged 40-49 this difference was significant (91% vs. 82%, p < .05), whereas no differences were detected for younger or older physicians. Among respondents in their 40s, 18% had undergone annual screenings in the past 5 years, compared to 48% of their colleagues above 50. Respondents were as likely to practice breast self-examination (98%) as to recommend it (93%), a pattern that was consistent across age groups. A logistic regression model of personal use of mammography significantly predicted recommending the procedure to patients (OR = 15.29, p = .001). Similarly, number of breast self-examinations performed over the past 2 years positively predicted patient recommendations of the procedure (OR = 1.31, p < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Obstetricians and gynecologists tended to recommend early mammography screening to their patients, though their personal practices indicated later start than their own recommendations and lower frequency of screening than peers in recent studies have recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26042627     DOI: 10.1111/JHQ-D-15-00040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Healthc Qual        ISSN: 1062-2551            Impact factor:   1.095


  5 in total

1.  Comparing GPs' risk attitudes for their own health and for their patients' : a troubling discrepancy?

Authors:  Antoine Nebout; Marie Cavillon; Bruno Ventelou
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Does culture matter social distancing under the COVID-19 pandemic?

Authors:  Toan Luu Duc Huynh
Journal:  Saf Sci       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.877

3.  Do informed consumers in Taiwan favour larger hospitals? A 10-year population-based study on differences in the selection of healthcare providers among medical professionals, their relatives and the general population.

Authors:  Raymond N Kuo; Wanchi Chen; Yuting Lin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Asymmetrical friendships? People are willing to risk COVID-19 infection from friends but are reluctant to pass it on to them.

Authors:  Jonas Ludwig; Fritz Strack
Journal:  J Appl Soc Psychol       Date:  2022-09-23

5.  How defensive medicine is defined in European medical literature: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nathalie Baungaard; Pia Ladeby Skovvang; Elisabeth Assing Hvidt; Helle Gerbild; Merethe Kirstine Andersen; Jesper Lykkegaard
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.