Literature DB >> 26042514

The comparison of the efficacy of radiofrequency nucleoplasty and targeted disc decompression in lumbar radiculopathy.

Barıs Adakli1, Keziban Sanem Cakar Turhan, Ibrahim Asik.   

Abstract

Chronic low back pain is a common clinical condition causing medical, socioeconomic, and treatment difficulties. In our study, we aimed to compare early and long-term efficacy of lumbar radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTC) nucleoplasty and targeted disc decompression (TDD) in patients with lumbar radiculopathy in whom previous conventional therapy had failed. The medical records of 37 patients undergoing TDD and 36 patients undergoing lumbar RFTC nucleoplasty were retrospectively examined and assigned to the Group D and Group N, respectively. In all patients Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Functional Rating Index (FRI) were recorded before treatment and after one, six and twelve months after the procedure. The North American Spine Society Satisfaction Scale (NASSSS) was also recoreded twelve months after the therapeutic procedure. Statistically significant postprocedural improvement in VAS and FRI was evident in both groups. VAS scores after one, six, and twelve month were slightly higher in Group N, compared to Group D. The overall procedure-related patient satisfaction ratio was 67.5% in the Group D, compared to 75% in the Group N. Regardless of the different mechanism of action, both methods are effective therapies for lumbar radiculopathy, with TDD showing long-term lower pain scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26042514      PMCID: PMC4469937          DOI: 10.17305/bjbms.2015.427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci        ISSN: 1512-8601            Impact factor:   3.363


  17 in total

1.  Stability of the lumbar spine after intradiscal electrothermal therapy.

Authors:  J Lee; G E Lutz; D Campbell; S A Rodeo; T Wright
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Sleep disturbance and nonmalignant chronic pain: a comprehensive review of the literature.

Authors:  L A Menefee; M J Cohen; W R Anderson; K Doghramji; E D Frank; H Lee
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.750

3.  Evidence-based practice guidelines for interventional techniques in the management of chronic spinal pain.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Peter S Staats; Vijay Singh; David M Schultz; Bradley D Vilims; Joseph F Jasper; David S Kloth; Andrea M Trescot; Hans C Hansen; Thomas D Falasca; Gabor B Racz; Timothy R Deer; Allen W Burton; Standiford Helm; Leland Lou; Cyrus E Bakhit; Elmer E Dunbar; Sairam L Atluri; Aaron K Calodney; Samuel J Hassenbusch; Claudio A Feler
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Minimally invasive spinal surgery using nucleoplasty and the Dekompressor tool: a comparison of two methods in a one year follow-up.

Authors:  J Lemcke; F Al-Zain; S Mutze; U Meier
Journal:  Minim Invasive Neurosurg       Date:  2011-02-07

5.  The results of nucleoplasty in patients with lumbar herniated disc: a prospective clinical study of 52 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Hasan Mirzai; Idil Tekin; Onur Yaman; Adem Bursali
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Effectiveness of transforaminal epidural steroid injections in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliotic stenosis and radiculopathy.

Authors:  Grant Cooper; Gregory E Lutz; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Julie Lin
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 7.  Pain management and palliative care in the era of managed care: issues for health insurers.

Authors:  D E Hoffmann
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.718

8.  Single level lumbar disc herniations resulting in radicular pain: pain and functional outcomes after treatment with targeted disc decompression.

Authors:  Michael K Schaufele
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 9.  Intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET) for the treatment of discogenic low back pain: patient selection and indications for use.

Authors:  David S Kloth; Douglas S Fenton; Gunnar B J Andersson; Jon E Block
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 10.  Percutaneous lumbar laser disc decompression: an update of current evidence.

Authors:  Vijay Singh; Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Aaron K Calodney; Peter S Staats; Frank J E Falco; David L Caraway; Joshua A Hirsch; Steven P Cohen
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  3 in total

1.  Comprehensive comparison of therapeutic efficacy of radiofrequency target disc decompression and nucleoplasty for lumbar disc herniation: a five year follow-up.

Authors:  Hui-Yong Nie; Ya-Bin Qi; Na Li; Suo-Liang Wang; Yong-Xiao Cao
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Comparison of coblation annuloplasty and radiofrequency thermocoagulation for treatment of lumbar discogenic pain.

Authors:  Dongguang Sun; Quancheng Li; Yuanzhang Tang; Weiyi Gong; Liangliang He; Zhi Dou; Jiaxiang Ni
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Technical pearls and surgical outcome of early transitional period experience in minimally invasive lumbar discectomy: A prospective study.

Authors:  Suyash Singh; Jayesh C Sardhara; Deepak Khatri; Jeena Joseph; Abhijit N Parab; Kamlesh S Bhaisora; Kuntal Kanti Das; Anant Mehrotra; Arun Kumar Srivastava; Sanjay Behari
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.