Literature DB >> 26042265

The structured communication tool SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation) improves communication in neonatology.

M Raymond, M C Harrison.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Effective communication, co-operation and teamwork have been identified as key determinants of patient safety. SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation) is a communication tool recommended by the World Health Organization and the UK National Health Service. SBAR is a structured method for communicating critical information that requires immediate attention and action, contributing to effective escalation of management and increased patient safety. To our knowledge, this is the first study showing use of SBAR in South Africa (SA).
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of adopting the SBAR communication tool in an acute clinical setting in SA.
METHODS: In the first phase of this study, neonatal nurses and doctors at Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, were gathered in a focus group and given a questionnaire asking about communication in the neonatal department. Neonatal nurses and doctors were then trained to use SBAR.
RESULTS: A telephone audit demonstrated an increase in SBAR use by registrars from 29% to 70% when calling consultants for help. After training, the majority of staff agreed that SBAR had helped with communication, confidence, and quality of patient care. There was qualitative evidence that SBAR led to greater promptness in care of acutely ill patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Adopting SBAR was associated with perceived improvement in communication between professionals and in the quality and safety of patient care. It is suggested that this simple tool be introduced to many other hospitals in SA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 26042265     DOI: 10.7196/samj.8684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  S Afr Med J


  6 in total

1.  Impact of the communication and patient hand-off tool SBAR on patient safety: a systematic review.

Authors:  Martin Müller; Jonas Jürgens; Marcus Redaèlli; Karsten Klingberg; Wolf E Hautz; Stephanie Stock
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Interprofessional learning during SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic conditions: the learning project I-reCovEr as a substitute for a rotation on an interprofessional training ward.

Authors:  Sebastian Bode; Alexandra Dürkop; Helena Wilcken; Stephanie Peters; Christine Straub
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2021-01-28

3.  Effectiveness of neonatal emergency nursing education through simulation training: Flipped learning based on Tanner's Clinical Judgement Model.

Authors:  Sun-Yi Yang
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2021-01-11

4.  The effect of situation, background, assessment, recommendation-based safety program on patient safety culture in intensive care unit nurses.

Authors:  Shahram Etemadifar; Zeynab Sedighi; Morteza Sedehi; Reza Masoudi
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2021-11-30

5.  Does classroom-based crew resource management training have an effect on attitudes between doctors and nurses?

Authors:  Christina K W Chan; Hang-kwong So; Wing-yiu Ng; Pei-kei Chan; Wai-ling Ma; Kin-ling Chan; Siu-ha Leung; Lap-yin Ho
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2016-04-09

6.  The determinants and outcomes of good provider communication: a cross-sectional study in seven African countries.

Authors:  Elysia Larson; Hannah H Leslie; Margaret E Kruk
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-02       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.