| Literature DB >> 26042101 |
Fuzhou Xu1, Cun Wu1, Fangfang Guo1, Guolin Cui1, Ximin Zeng2, Bing Yang1, Jun Lin2.
Abstract
Upon colonization in the host gastrointestinal tract, the enteric bacterial pathogen Campylobacter jejuni is exposed to a variety of signaling molecules including the catecholamine hormones epinephrine (Epi) and norepinephrine (NE). NE has been observed to stimulate the growth and potentially enhance the pathogenicity of C. jejuni. However, the underlying mechanisms are still largely unknown. In this study, both Epi and NE were also observed to promote C. jejuni growth in MEMα-based iron-restricted medium. Adhesion and invasion of Caco-2 cells by C. jejuni were also enhanced upon exposure to Epi or NE. To further examine the effect of Epi or NE on the pathobiology of C. jejuni, transcriptomic profiles were conducted for C. jejuni NCTC 11168 that was cultured in iron-restricted medium supplemented with Epi or NE. Compared to the genes expressed in the absence of the catecholamine hormones, 183 and 156 genes were differentially expressed in C. jejuni NCTC 11168 that was grown in the presence of Epi and NE, respectively. Of these differentially expressed genes, 102 genes were common for both Epi and NE treatments. The genes differentially expressed by Epi or NE are involved in diverse cellular functions including iron uptake, motility, virulence, oxidative stress response, nitrosative stress tolerance, enzyme metabolism, DNA repair and metabolism and ribosomal protein biosynthesis. The transcriptome analysis indicated that Epi and NE have similar effects on the gene expression of C. jejuni, and provided insights into the delicate interaction between C. jejuni and intestinal stress hormones in the host.Entities:
Keywords: Campylobacter jejuni; adhesion and invasion; catecholamine hormones; growth promotion; microarray; virulence
Year: 2015 PMID: 26042101 PMCID: PMC4435418 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00452
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Growth response of . Results represent the mean plus the standard deviation (SD) of three independent experiments.
Figure 2Effects of Epi and NE on adhesion and invasion of Caco-2 cells by . Results were expressed as percent of adhered or invasive bacteria relative to inoculum. Results represent the mean plus the standard deviation (SD) of three independent experiments.
Summary of differentially expressed genes in .
| Epi | 86 | 70 | 156 |
| NE | 96 | 87 | 183 |
| Epi + NE | 56 | 46 | 102 |
| Epi only | 30 | 24 | 54 |
| NE only | 40 | 41 | 81 |
Differentially expressed genes that were commonly identified upon Epi and NE treatments.
Differentially expressed genes were only identified upon Epi treatment.
Differentially expressed genes were only identified upon NE treatment.
Validation of microarray data by qRT-PCR.
| 2.51 | 1.49 | 2.99 | 1.59 | |
| 2.98 | 1.91 | 4.21 | 2.39 | |
| 2.90 | 2.25 | 3.25 | 1.80 | |
| 3.50 | 2.43 | 2.67 | 1.28 | |
| 4.00 | 1.87 | 6.29 | 2.97 | |
| −16.43 | −13.00 | −8.79 | −13.64 | |
| −3.37 | −4.92 | −2.81 | −4.96 | |
| −3.24 | −6.63 | −2.96 | −7.36 | |
| −3.10 | −5.59 | −2.50 | −6.75 | |
| 1.01 | 1.00 | 1.02 | 1.00 | |
Mean of three independent experiments.
Figure 3Functional classification of differentially expressed genes in . Gene functions are sorted according to COG categories: Information storage and processing (J: Translation, ribosomal structure, and biogenesis; K: Transcription; L: Replication, recombination and repair); Cellular processes and signaling (D: Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning; V: Defense mechanisms; T: Signal transduction mechanisms; M: Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis; N: Cell motility; U: Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport; O: Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones); Metabolism (C: Energy production and conversion; G: Carbohydrate transport and metabolism; E: Amino acid transport and metabolism; F: Nucleotide transport and metabolism; H: Coenzyme transport and metabolism; I: Lipid transport and metabolism; P: Inorganic ion transport and metabolism; Q: Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism); Poorly characterized (R: General function prediction only; S: Function unknown or not in COG database).
Fold change of iron-uptake system components in .
| Ferric enterobactin uptake receptor | ||||
| 1.1 | 1.2 | Enterobactin uptake permease | ||
| −1.2 | −1.4 | Enterobactin uptake permease | ||
| 1.0 | −1.2 | Enterobactin uptake ATP-binding protein | ||
| 1.3 | 1.4 | Enterobactin uptake substrate-binding protein | ||
| Iron permease | ||||
| −1.3 | −1.3 | Hypothetical protein | ||
| Integral membrane protein | ||||
| ABC transporter permease | ||||
| Integral membrane protein | ||||
| −1.3 | ABC transporter ATP-binding protein | |||
| 1.2 | 1.1 | Putative pyridoxamine 5′-phosphate oxidase | ||
| Hemin uptake system outer membrane receptor | ||||
| Hemin uptake system permease | ||||
| Hemin uptake system ATP-binding protein | ||||
| Hemin uptake system substrate-binding protein | ||||
| −1.4 | −1.5 | Iron-uptake ABC transporter ATP-binding protein | ||
| Iron-uptake ABC transporter permease | ||||
| Iron-uptake ABC transporter substrate-binding protein | ||||
| Lipoprotein | ||||
| Iron transport protein | ||||
| TonB-denpendent outer membrane receptor | ||||
| Biopolymer transport protein | ||||
| Biopolymer transport protein | ||||
| −1.3 | −1.1 | TonB transport protein | ||
| Putative exbB/tolQ family transport protein | ||||
| Putative exbD/tolR family transport protein | ||||
| −1.3 | −1.2 | TonB transport protein | ||
| −1.3 | −1.5 | Putative MotA/TolQ/ExbB proton channel family protein | ||
| −1.0 | −1.3 | Putative exbD/tolR family transport protein | ||
| −1.5 | −1.3 | TonB transport protein | ||
| 1.1 | 1.0 | Ferric uptake regulator protein | ||
Significant difference of fold changes is shown in boldface.
Fold change of the flagella assembly components in .
| 1.2 | 1.4 | Flagellin | ||
| 1.1 | 1.2 | Flagellar protein | ||
| 1.1 | 1.2 | Flagellar capping protein | ||
| Flagellar hook-associated protein | ||||
| 1.5 | 1.4 | Flagellar hook-associated protein | ||
| Flagellar hook protein | ||||
| Flagellar hook protein | ||||
| Flagellar basal body rod modification protein | ||||
| Flagellar hook-length control protein | ||||
| 1.2 | 1.4 | Flagellar basal body rod protein | ||
| Flagellar basal-body rod protein | ||||
| Flagellar basal body L-ring protein | ||||
| Flagellar basal body P-ring protein | ||||
| 1.0 | −1.2 | Flagellar hook-basal body protein | ||
| 1.2 | 1.3 | Flagellar MS-ring protein | ||
| 1.2 | 1.3 | Flagellar motor switch protein G | ||
| 1.0 | 1.0 | Flagellar assembly protein H | ||
| −1.3 | − | Flagellar biosynthesis protein | ||
| 1.3 | Flagellar biosynthesis protein | |||
| 1.0 | 1.0 | Flagellar protein | ||
| 1.1 | 1.1 | Antisigma factor | ||
| 1.2 | 1.2 | Sigma-54 associated transcriptional activator | ||
| 1.0 | 1.1 | Flagellar biosynthesis sigma factor | ||
Significant difference of fold changes is shown in boldface.