Literature DB >> 26041850

Intermediate to Long-Term Outcomes of Total Ankle Replacement with the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement (STAR).

Timothy R Daniels1, D Joshua Mayich2, Murray J Penner3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement (STAR) prosthesis has been in clinical use since 1981, with investigational use in the U.S. since 1998. Few studies of the North American version of the STAR are available. This prospective cohort study analyzed intermediate to long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty with use of the STAR prosthesis at two Canadian centers.
METHODS: Consecutive patients who received the STAR prosthesis between 2001 and 2005 were enrolled at two large, urban teaching hospitals. Patients were annually evaluated clinically, and the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) and the Short Form (SF)-36 were administered.
RESULTS: One hundred and eleven ankles underwent arthroplasty with the STAR prosthesis. One-half of the patients were male; the mean age was 61.9 ± 11.7 years. Sixty-eight of the ankles underwent a total of 121 additional procedures during ankle arthroplasty, including gastrocnemius release, subtalar arthrodesis, triple arthrodesis, tendoachilles lengthening, and removal of hardware. The mean duration of follow-up for all living patients without revision (seventy-three ankles) was 9.0 ± 1.0 years. Thirteen (12%) of the ankles required metal component revision at a mean of 4.3 ± 3.0 years (range, 0.6 to 10.2 years). Twenty (18%) of the prostheses underwent polyethylene bearing exchange, mostly due to fracture, at a mean of 5.2 ± 2.1 years (range, 1.5 to 9.3 years). Most (97%) of the revisions and exchanges occurred in patients with a diagnosis of primary, secondary, or posttraumatic osteoarthritis (p = 0.0003). The mean change from baseline to final follow-up was -36.5 ± 23.3 points for AOS pain, -38.6 ± 26.8 points for AOS disability, and 9.6 ± 10.3 points for the SF-36 physical component summary score. The SF-36 mental component summary score was unchanged.
CONCLUSIONS: Intermediate patient-reported outcomes were good after ankle arthroplasty with the STAR prosthesis performed by experienced surgeons, and long-term outcomes demonstrated a 12% rate of metal component revision and 18% rate of polyethylene bearing failure. The revision rate was substantially higher among the first twenty ankles than among subsequent ankles, but the early ankles had nearly two years' longer follow-up than subsequent ankles. Additional study to elucidate possible reasons for polyethylene bearing failure is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2015 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26041850     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  12 in total

1.  Survival of the Scandinavian total ankle replacement (STAR): results of ten to nineteen years follow-up.

Authors:  Arno Frigg; Ursula Germann; Martin Huber; Monika Horisberger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  CORR Insights®: Can a Three-component Prosthesis be Used for Conversion of Painful Ankle Arthrodesis to Total Ankle Replacement?

Authors:  Andrew Haskell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Peculiarities in Ankle Cartilage.

Authors:  Matthew J Kraeutler; Tanyaporn Kaenkumchorn; Cecilia Pascual-Garrido; Markus A Wimmer; Susanna Chubinskaya
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Long-term follow-up of Bologna-Oxford (BOX) total ankle arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alberto Bianchi; Nicolò Martinelli; Eleonora Caboni; Giorgio Raggi; Francesca Manfroni; Valerio Sansone
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Metal artifact reduction MRI of total ankle arthroplasty implants.

Authors:  Cesar de Cesar Netto; Lucas F Fonseca; Benjamin Fritz; Steven E Stern; Esther Raithel; Mathias Nittka; Lew C Schon; Jan Fritz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale for use in French-speaking populations.

Authors:  Magalie Angers; Amy Svotelis; Frederic Balg; Jean-Pascal Allard
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Polyethylene Fractures in Mobile-Bearing Total Ankle Arthroplasty: Report of 2 Cases.

Authors:  Alvaro Daras-Ballester; Vicente Vicent-Carsi; Enrique F Navarrete-Faubel; Maria Sanchez-Gonzalez; Cristina Ramirez-Fuentes
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2022-01-18

8.  A propensity score-matched analysis comparing outpatient and short-stay hospitalization to standard inpatient hospitalization following total ankle arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mark A Plantz; Alain E Sherman; Anish R Kadakia
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  The Infinity Total Ankle System: Early Clinical Results With 2- to 4-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Murray Penner; W Hodges Davis; Kevin Wing; Thomas Bemenderfer; Feras Waly; Robert B Anderson
Journal:  Foot Ankle Spec       Date:  2018-06-04

10.  What Are the Indications for Implant Revision in Three-component Total Ankle Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Daniel Richter; Nicola Krähenbühl; Roman Susdorf; Alexej Barg; Roxa Ruiz; Beat Hintermann
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.755

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.