| Literature DB >> 26041546 |
Ai Nishimoto1, Yuki Tachibana, Kaoru Takaura, Takehiro Ochi, Hironari Koyama.
Abstract
To confirm our hypothesis that the sex and age of cynomolgus monkeys influences the effect of training, we employed a new training technique designed to increase the animal's affinity for animal care personnel. During 151 days of training, monkeys aged 2 to 10 years accepted each 3 raisins/3 times/day, and communicated with animal care personnel (5 times/day). Behavior was scored using integers between -1 and 5. Before training, 35 of the 61 monkeys refused raisins offered directly by animal care personnel (Score -1, 0 and 1). After training, 28 of these 35 monkeys (80%) accepted raisins offered directly by animal care personnel (>Score 2). The mean score of monkeys increased from 1.2 ± 0.1 to 4.3 ± 0.2. The minimum training period required for monkeys to reach Score 2 was longer for females than for males. After 151 days, 6 of the 31 females and 1 of the 30 males still refused raisins offered directly by animal care personnel. Beneficial effects of training were obtained in both young and adult monkeys. These results indicate that our new training technique markedly improves the affinity of monkeys for animal care personnel, and that these effects tend to vary by sex but not age. In addition, abnormal behavior and symptoms of monkeys were improved by this training.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26041546 PMCID: PMC4637373 DOI: 10.1538/expanim.14-0100
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Anim ISSN: 0007-5124
Caution for each step of training
| Caution | |
|---|---|
| Score -1 | Educate monkeys that raisins taste good |
| Score 0 | Shorten mental distance by degrees between monkeys and animal care personnel when monkeys eat raisins |
| Score 1 | Keep animal care personnel’s hands close to near the cage when offering raisins from outside of the cage |
| Score 2 | Prolong time when monkeys are close to animal care personnel |
| Score 3 | Offer raisins from lower region of the cage |
| Score 4 | Offer raisins when in close proximity to monkey’s face |
| Score 5 | Make contact with monkey’s hands and face gently when they are eating raisins |
Fig. 1.Distribution of affinity for animal care personnel pre- and post-training in monkeys. Results are shown number of animals in each score. Monkeys with a score of more than Scores 2 were considered to have a positive affinity for animal care personnel when performing tasks.
Fig. 2.Change in score during the training to improve affinity of monkeys for animal care personnel. Results are shown as score. Values are means ± SEM (n=61). Statistical significance was analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. **P<0.01 indicates a significant difference from the pre-training value.
The minimum days required for monkeys to accept raisins offered directly by animal care personnel (Scores 2, 3, 4 and 5)
| Sex | Number | Time (days) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects with Score 0 pre-training | |||
| Female | 7 | 60.0 ± 12.2 | |
| Male | 5 | 41.8 ± 7.2 | |
| All | 12 | 52.4 ± 7.9 | |
| Subjects with Score 1 pre-training | |||
| Female | 10 | 25.0 ± 6.3 | |
| Male | 5 | 18.0 ± 4.4 | |
| All | 15 | 22.7 ± 4.5 | |
Results are shown as the minimum training period required for monkeys to reach Score 2. Values are means ± SEM. Statistical significance between female and male was analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.
Effect of training on affinity of monkeys for animal care personnel by sex group of monkeys
| Sex | Number | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects with Score 0 pre-training | |||
| Female | 12 | 2.6 ± 0.4 | |
| Male | 6 | 3.7 ± 0.6** | |
| Subjects with Score 1 pre-training | |||
| Female | 11 | 4.4 ± 0.5 | |
| Male | 5 | All Score 5 | |
Results are shown as score. Values are means ± SEM. Statistical significance was analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. **P<0.01 indicates a significant difference from the female monkeys value.
Effect of training on affinity of monkeys for animal care personnel by age group of monkeys
| Age (years) | Number | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-training | Post-training 151 days | ||
| 2–3 | 29 | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 3.8 ± 0.3** |
| 4–6 | 21 | 1.9 ± 0.1 | 4.6 ± 0.2** |
| 7–10 | 11 | 1.6 ± 0.4 | 4.9 ± 0.1** |
Results are shown as score. Values are means ± SEM. Statistical significance was analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. **P<0.01 indicates a significant difference from the pre-training value.