| Literature DB >> 26041418 |
Juliane Almeida Moreira1, Marília Rocha Laurentino1, Rosângela Pinheiro Gonçalves Machado1, Maritza Cavalcante Barbosa1, Ronaldo Pinheiro Gonçalves1, Amanda de Menezes Mota1, Lilianne Brito da Silva Rocha1, Alice Maria Costa Martins1, Alcínia Braga de Lima Arruda1, Iêda Pereira de Souza1, Romélia Pinheiro Gonçalves2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of fetal hemoglobin (Hb F) on hemolysis biomarkers in sickle cell anemia patients.Entities:
Keywords: Anemia; Biological markers; Fetal hemoglobin; Hemolysis; Sickle cell
Year: 2015 PMID: 26041418 PMCID: PMC4459481 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjhh.2015.01.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter ISSN: 1516-8484
Demographic and hematologic parameters of sickle cell anemia patients (n = 50) and control group (n = 20).
| Patients ( | Control ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Gender (F/M) | 28/22 | 14/6 |
| Age | 37.78 (20–63) | 27.67 (20–55) |
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 8.596 ± 0.2093 | 12.34 ± 0.5 |
| Hematocrit (%) | 24.93 ± 0.5791 | 39 ± 0.6 |
| MCV (fL) | 98.84 ± 1.515 | 94.4 ± 1.5 |
| MCH (pg) | 34.50 ± 0.6112 | 33.4 ± 0.8 |
| MCHC (%) | 34.41 ± 0.1868 | 32.5 ± 0.5 |
| Leucocytes (×109/L) | 13.7 ± 2.7 | 6.3 ± 1.6 |
| Platelets (×109/L) | 381.8 ± 24.5 | 390.2 ± 25.7 |
| Hb F (%) | 12.68 ± 1.162 | – |
| Hb S (%) | 80.93 ± 1.006 | – |
MCV: Mean corpuscular volume; MCH: Mean corpuscular hemoglobin; Hb F: Fetal hemoglobin; Hb S: Sickle hemoglobin.
Data are expressed in mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).
Comparative analysis of the hemolysis parameters in sickle cell anemia patients (n = 50) and the control group (n = 20).
| Parameters | Patients | Control | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reticulocytes (%) | 50 | 13.85 ± 0.89 | 20 | 0.94 ± 0.09 | <0.0001 |
| LDH (U/L) | 50 | 636.20 ± 62.64 | 20 | 310.60 ± 8.39 | 0.0064 |
| Uric acid (mg/dL) | 50 | 5.46 ± 0.28 | 20 | 3.61 ± 0.17 | <0.0001 |
| Arginase I (ng/mL) | 50 | 71.87 ± 4.44 | 20 | 8.61 ± 0.36 | <0.0001 |
LDH: Lactate dehydrogenase.
Data are expressed as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM) and analyzed by the Mann–Whitney test and Unpaired t test; significant differences are defined as a p-value <0.05.
Figure 1Comparison of hemolysis biomarkers levels according to HbF concentration. (A) Reticulocytes; (B) Uric Acid; (C) Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH); (D) Arginase I. Results are expressed as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM) and analyzed using the unpaired t-test and Mann–Whitney test.
Figure 2Comparison of arginase I levels according to HU dosage. Results are expressed in mean ± standard error of mean (SEM) and analyzed by Unpaired t test.