Literature DB >> 26041340

Knowledge co-production and boundary work to promote implementation of conservation plans.

Jeanne L Nel1,2, Dirk J Roux2,3, Amanda Driver4, Liesl Hill5, Ashton C Maherry1, Kate Snaddon6, Chantel R Petersen1, Lindie B Smith-Adao1, Heidi Van Deventer5, Belinda Reyers1.   

Abstract

Knowledge co-production and boundary work offer planners a new frame for critically designing a social process that fosters collaborative implementation of resulting plans. Knowledge co-production involves stakeholders from diverse knowledge systems working iteratively toward common vision and action. Boundary work is a means of creating permeable knowledge boundaries that satisfy the needs of multiple social groups while guarding the functional integrity of contributing knowledge systems. Resulting products are boundary objects of mutual interest that maintain coherence across all knowledge boundaries. We examined how knowledge co-production and boundary work can bridge the gap between planning and implementation and promote cross-sectoral cooperation. We applied these concepts to well-established stages in regional conservation planning within a national scale conservation planning project aimed at identifying areas for conserving rivers and wetlands of South Africa and developing an institutional environment for promoting their conservation. Knowledge co-production occurred iteratively over 4 years in interactive stake-holder workshops that included co-development of national freshwater conservation goals and spatial data on freshwater biodiversity and local conservation feasibility; translation of goals into quantitative inputs that were used in Marxan to select draft priority conservation areas; review of draft priority areas; and packaging of resulting map products into an atlas and implementation manual to promote application of the priority area maps in 37 different decision-making contexts. Knowledge co-production stimulated dialogue and negotiation and built capacity for multi-scale implementation beyond the project. The resulting maps and information integrated diverse knowledge types of over 450 stakeholders and represented >1000 years of collective experience. The maps provided a consistent national source of information on priority conservation areas for rivers and wetlands and have been applied in 25 of the 37 use contexts since their launch just over 3 years ago. When framed as a knowledge co-production process supported by boundary work, regional conservation plans can be developed into valuable boundary objects that offer a tangible tool for multi-agency cooperation around conservation. Our work provides practical guidance for promoting uptake of conservation science and contributes to an evidence base on how conservation efforts can be improved.
© 2015 Society for Conservation Biology.

Keywords:  FEPA; bridging organization; freshwater conservation planning; integrated water resource management; intercambio de conocimiento; knowledge exchange; manejo integrado de recursos hídricos; mapeo participativo; organización conectiva; participatory mapping; planeación de la conservación de agua dulce

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26041340     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  9 in total

1.  People-Centered and Ecosystem-Based Knowledge Co-Production to Promote Proactive Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Development in Namibia.

Authors:  Axel Schick; Christina Sandig; Anja Krause; Peter R Hobson; Stefan Porembski; Pierre L Ibisch
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 2.  A review and meta-analysis of collaborative research prioritization studies in ecology, biodiversity conservation and environmental science.

Authors:  Cody J Dey; Adam I Rego; Jonathan D Midwood; Marten A Koops
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Knowledge that Acts: Evaluating the Outcomes of a Knowledge Brokering Intervention in Western Australia's Ningaloo Region.

Authors:  Kelly Chapman; Fabio Boschetti; Elizabeth Fulton; Pierre Horwitz; Tod Jones; Pascal Scherrer; Geoff Syme
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Conserving biodiversity takes a plan: How planners implement ecological information for biodiversity conservation.

Authors:  Sara A Gagné; Kaitlynn Bryan-Scaggs; Robert H W Boyer; Wei-Ning Xiang
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 5.129

5.  Phylogenetically informed spatial planning is required to conserve the mammalian tree of life.

Authors:  Dan F Rosauer; Laura J Pollock; Simon Linke; Walter Jetz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Five Steps to Inject Transformative Change into the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework.

Authors:  R Edward Grumbine; Jianchu Xu
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 8.589

7.  Tackling the Science Usability Gap in a Warming World: Co-Producing Useable Climate Information for Natural Resource Management.

Authors:  Molly S Cross; Lauren E Oakes; Heidi E Kretser; Raymond Bredehoft; Paul Dey; Anika Mahoney; Noelle Smith; Ian Tator; Jim Wasseen
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.644

8.  Mahout Perspectives on Asian Elephants and Their Living Conditions.

Authors:  Hannah S Mumby
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Local Spatialized Knowledge of Threats to Forest Conservation in Ghana's High Forest Zone.

Authors:  Dorcas Peggy Somuah; Mirjam A F Ros-Tonen; Isa Baud
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.266

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.