Literature DB >> 26041263

How do changes in the mtDNA and mitochondrial dysfunction influence cancer and cancer therapy? Challenges, opportunities and models.

M W van Gisbergen1, A M Voets2, M H W Starmans3, I F M de Coo4, R Yadak5, R F Hoffmann6, P C Boutros7, H J M Smeets8, L Dubois9, P Lambin10.   

Abstract

Several mutations in nuclear genes encoding for mitochondrial components have been associated with an increased cancer risk or are even causative, e.g. succinate dehydrogenase (SDHB, SDHC and SDHD genes) and iso-citrate dehydrogenase (IDH1 and IDH2 genes). Recently, studies have suggested an eminent role for mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations in the development of a wide variety of cancers. Various studies associated mtDNA abnormalities, including mutations, deletions, inversions and copy number alterations, with mitochondrial dysfunction. This might, explain the hampered cellular bioenergetics in many cancer cell types. Germline (e.g. m.10398A>G; m.6253T>C) and somatic mtDNA mutations as well as differences in mtDNA copy number seem to be associated with cancer risk. It seems that mtDNA can contribute as driver or as complementary gene mutation according to the multiple-hit model. This can enhance the mutagenic/clonogenic potential of the cell as observed for m.8993T>G or influences the metastatic potential in later stages of cancer progression. Alternatively, other mtDNA variations will be innocent passenger mutations in a tumor and therefore do not contribute to the tumorigenic or metastatic potential. In this review, we discuss how reported mtDNA variations interfere with cancer treatment and what implications this has on current successful pharmaceutical interventions. Mutations in MT-ND4 and mtDNA depletion have been reported to be involved in cisplatin resistance. Pharmaceutical impairment of OXPHOS by metformin can increase the efficiency of radiotherapy. To study mitochondrial dysfunction in cancer, different cellular models (like ρ(0) cells or cybrids), in vivo murine models (xenografts and specific mtDNA mouse models in combination with a spontaneous cancer mouse model) and small animal models (e.g. Danio rerio) could be potentially interesting to use. For future research, we foresee that unraveling mtDNA variations can contribute to personalized therapy for specific cancer types and improve the outcome of the disease.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Mitochondrial DNA; Model; Mutation; OXPHOS; Variation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26041263     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2015.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res        ISSN: 1383-5742            Impact factor:   5.657


  61 in total

1.  SITC cancer immunotherapy resource document: a compass in the land of biomarker discovery.

Authors:  Siwen Hu-Lieskovan; Srabani Bhaumik; Kavita Dhodapkar; Jean-Charles J B Grivel; Sumati Gupta; Brent A Hanks; Sylvia Janetzki; Thomas O Kleen; Yoshinobu Koguchi; Amanda W Lund; Cristina Maccalli; Yolanda D Mahnke; Ruslan D Novosiadly; Senthamil R Selvan; Tasha Sims; Yingdong Zhao; Holden T Maecker
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 13.751

Review 2.  Profiles of Radioresistance Mechanisms in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Luksana Chaiswing; Heidi L Weiss; Rani D Jayswal; Daret K St Clair; Natasha Kyprianou
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncog       Date:  2018

3.  The Mitochondrial DNA-Associated Protein SWIB5 Influences mtDNA Architecture and Homologous Recombination.

Authors:  Jonas Blomme; Olivier Van Aken; Jelle Van Leene; Teddy Jégu; Riet De Rycke; Michiel De Bruyne; Jasmien Vercruysse; Jonah Nolf; Twiggy Van Daele; Liesbeth De Milde; Mattias Vermeersch; Catherine Colas des Francs-Small; Geert De Jaeger; Moussa Benhamed; A Harvey Millar; Dirk Inzé; Nathalie Gonzalez
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 4.  Mitochondria and Cancer.

Authors:  Sejal Vyas; Elma Zaganjor; Marcia C Haigis
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  Mitochondrial determinants of cancer health disparities.

Authors:  Aaheli Roy Choudhury; Keshav K Singh
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 15.707

6.  TFAM overexpression diminishes skeletal muscle atrophy after hindlimb suspension in mice.

Authors:  Nicholas T Theilen; Nevena Jeremic; Gregory J Weber; Suresh C Tyagi
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 4.013

7.  Mitochondrial DNA copy number in peripheral blood leukocytes is associated with biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients in African Americans.

Authors:  Junfeng Xu; Wen-Shin Chang; Chia-Wen Tsai; Da-Tian Bau; John W Davis; Timothy C Thompson; Christopher J Logothetis; Jian Gu
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 8.  Targeted and Off-Target (Bystander and Abscopal) Effects of Radiation Therapy: Redox Mechanisms and Risk/Benefit Analysis.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Pouget; Alexandros G Georgakilas; Jean-Luc Ravanat
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 8.401

9.  5-Aminolevulinic acid induced apoptosis via oxidative stress in normal gastric epithelial cells.

Authors:  Hiromu Ito; Hiromi Kurokawa; Hideo Suzuki; Hiroko P Indo; Hideyuki J Majima; Hirofumi Matsui
Journal:  J Clin Biochem Nutr       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.114

Review 10.  Radiogenomics: A systems biology approach to understanding genetic risk factors for radiotherapy toxicity?

Authors:  Carsten Herskind; Christopher J Talbot; Sarah L Kerns; Marlon R Veldwijk; Barry S Rosenstein; Catharine M L West
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 8.679

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.