Literature DB >> 2603990

Evaluation of systolic effectiveness and its determinants: pressure/midwall-volume relations.

D M Regen1.   

Abstract

It is generally agreed that systolic performance of a heart chamber is the fractional inward displacement of its wall during contraction and that this depends on preload, afterload, and characteristics of the relation between afterload and end-ejection dimensions. However, there is no consensus on the details of this statement. How can one define and identify the wall element, the displacement of which best expresses performance? What is preload? What parameters best characterize the relation between afterload and end-ejection dimensions? Dividing a thick-wall compliance equation by a thick-wall pressure equation reveals the midwall element, the normalized displacements of which depend consistently on normalized pressure changes according to wall properties regardless of wall-to-cavity ratio. This midwall element's reference dimensions best express chamber size, its reference-normalized dimensions best express wall stretch or distension, and its fractional displacements best express systolic performance. The hydraulically unloaded state is a poor reference for expressing size, normalizing dimensions, and defining chamber characteristics; it is inaccessible, immeasurable, acutely variable, and not a mechanically unloaded state. Therefore stiffness is neither a characteristic nor an expression of systolic vigor. A better reference state is the "average basal end-diastolic distension to which the chamber is accustomed"; it is accessible, measurable, and a state where stretches throughout the wall are near a characteristic value. End-diastolic midwall dimension relative to its average basal value is a valid expression of preload. There are two main hydrodynamic characteristics expressing systolic vigor: 1) peak isovolumic pressure at reference distension and 2) displacement from reference distension if afterload were zero. An additional characteristic is shape of the pressure-volume relation. It appears possible to account for systolic performance in terms of preload, afterload, and these hydrodynamic characteristics.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2603990     DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.1989.257.6.H2070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol        ISSN: 0002-9513


  5 in total

1.  Tensions and stresses of ellipsoidal chambers.

Authors:  D M Regen
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Mechanical characteristics of tachycardia-induced left-ventricular failure as evaluated in isolated dog hearts.

Authors:  Z Wang; W D Denney; L K Taylor; D M Regen; D E Hansen
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Characteristics of left-ventricular isovolumic pressure waves in isolated dog hearts.

Authors:  D M Regen; P K Denton; W C Howe; L K Taylor; D E Hansen
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Characteristics of single isovolumic left-ventricular pressure waves of dog hearts in situ.

Authors:  D M Regen; W C Howe; J T Peterson; W C Little
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Estimation of left-ventricular systolic performance and its determinants in man from pressures and dimensions of one beat: effects of aortic valve stenosis and replacement.

Authors:  D M Regen; H Nonogi; O M Hess
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.037

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.