| Literature DB >> 26039295 |
Jênifa Cavalcante dos Santos Santiago1, Thereza Maria Magalhães Moreira2, Raquel Sampaio Florêncio1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: to verify associations between overweight and the characteristics of young adult students to support nursing care.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26039295 PMCID: PMC4458998 DOI: 10.1590/0104-1169.0174.2549
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Lat Am Enfermagem ISSN: 0104-1169
Bivariate analysis of sociodemographic characteristics associated with overweight/obesity in young adult students. Maracanaú, CE, Brazil, 2012
| Variable | Cases | Controls | p* | Raw odds ratio (CI 95%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % | Mean (SD) |
| % | Mean (SD) | |||
| Age | ||||||||
| 20 to 22 years old | 114 | 77.60% | 21.9 (±1.42) | 253 | 86.10% | 20.93 (±1.19) | 1 | |
| 23 to 24 years old | 33 | 22.40% | 41 | 13.90% | 0.325 | 1.79 (1.07-2.97) | ||
| Sex | ||||||||
| Male | 71 | 48.30% | 150 | 51.00% | 1 | |||
| Female | 76 | 51.70% | 144 | 49.00% | 0.590 | 1.12 (0.75-1.66) | ||
|
| ||||||||
| Caucasian | 57 | 38.80% | 79 | 26.90% | 1 | |||
| Non-Caucasian | 90 | 61.20% | 215 | 73.10% | 0.011 | 0.58 (0.38-0.88) | ||
| Marital status | ||||||||
| Partner | 50 | 34.00% | 45 | 15.30% | 1 | |||
| No partner | 97 | 66.00% | 249 | 84.70% | 0.000 | 2.85 (1.79-4.55) | ||
|
| ||||||||
| Up to 2 times MW† | 117 | 79.60% | 237 | 80.60% | 1 | |||
| More than 2 times MW | 30 | 20.40% | 57 | 19.40% | 0.800 | 1.07 (0.65-1.75) | ||
|
| ||||||||
| Yes | 11 | 7.50% | 19 | 6.50% | 1 | |||
| No | 136 | 92.50% | 275 | 93.50% | 0.689 | 1.17 (0.54-2.53) | ||
| Grade | ||||||||
| High School | 90 | 62.10% | 158 | 55.60% | 1 | |||
| Senior year (Grade 12) | 55 | 37.90% | 126 | 44.40% | 0.202 | 0.77 (0.51-1.15) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Up to 8 years | 75 | 51.00% | 147 | 50.00% | 0.950 | 1 | ||
| More than 8 years | 39 | 26.50% | 77 | 26.20% | 0.804 | 1.07 (0.61-1.89) | ||
| Do not know | 33 | 22.40% | 70 | 23.80% | 0.976 | 0.99 (0.62-1.60) | ||
|
| ||||||||
| Up to 8 years | 82 | 55.80% | 155 | 52.70% | 0.817 | 1 | ||
| More than 8 years | 36 | 24.50% | 75 | 25.50% | 0.849 | 1.06 (0.59-1.92) | ||
| Do not know | 29 | 19.70% | 64 | 21.80% | 0.691 | 0.91 (0.56-1.47) | ||
Chi-square statistical significance;
Minimum wage (MW) current in Brazil in 2012: R$ 622 Reais
Bivariate analysis of clinical and exposure characteristics associated with overweight/obesity in young adult students. Maracanaú, CE, Brazil, 2012
| Variable | Cases | Controls | p* | Raw Odds Ratio (CI 95%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % | Mean (SD) |
| % | Mean (SD) | |||
| Weight during childhood | ||||||||
| No overweight | 123 | 83.70% | 265 | 90.10% | 0.051 | 1 | ||
| Overweight | 24 | 16.30% | 29 | 9.90% | 1.78 (1.01-3.19) | |||
| Weight during childhood | ||||||||
| No overweight | 108 | 73.50% | 281 | 95.60% | 0.000 | 1 | ||
| Overweight | 39 | 26.50% | 13 | 4.40% | 7.81 (4.01-15.19) | |||
| Father’s weight gain | ||||||||
| No overweight | 120 | 81.60% | 240 | 81.60% | 1.000 | 1 | ||
| Overweight | 27 | 18.40% | 54 | 18.40% | 1.00 (0.60-1.67) | |||
| Father’s weight gain | ||||||||
| No overweight | 97 | 66.00% | 228 | 77.60% | 0.010 | 1 | ||
| Overweight | 50 | 34.00% | 66 | 22.40% | 1.78 (1.15-2.76) | |||
| Systolic blood pressure | ||||||||
| Normotensive | 142 | 96.60% | 117.01 (±13.46) | 285 | 96.90% | 112.05 (±11.99) | 0.848 | 1 |
| Hypertension | 5 | 3.40% | 9 | 3.10% | 1.12 (0.37-3.39) | |||
| Diastolic blood pressure | ||||||||
| Normotensive | 127 | 86.40% | 75.67 (±14.43) | 288 | 98.00% | 68.76 (±10.37) | 0.000 | 1 |
| Hypertensive | 20 | 13.60% | 6 | 2.00% | 7.56 (2.97-19.27) | |||
| Abdominal circumference | ||||||||
| Normal | 99 | 67.30% | M:91.85 (±9.86) F:90.27 (±10.11) | 291 | 99.00% | M:76.51 (±5.50) F:74.74 (±6.66) | 0.000 | 1 |
| Altered † | 48 | 32.70% | 3 | 1.00% | 47.03 (14.33-154.36) | |||
| Waist/hip ratio | ||||||||
| Normal | 107 | 72.80% | M:0.86 (±0.62) F:0.85 (±0.74) | 260 | 88.40% | M:0.82 (±0.08) F:0.80 (±0.09) | 0.000 | 1 |
| Altered ‡ | 40 | 27.20% | 34 | 11.60% | 2.86 (1.72-4.76) | |||
| Smoking | ||||||||
| No | 129 | 87.80% | 250 | 85.00% | 0.439 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 18 | 12.20% | 44 | 15.00% | 0.79 (0.44-1.43) | |||
| Alcohol | ||||||||
| No | 41 | 29.90% | 85 | 32.10% | 0.660 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 96 | 70.10% | 180 | 67.90% | 1.11 (0.71-1.73) | |||
| Unbalanced diet | ||||||||
| No | 71 | 48.30% | 126 | 42.90% | 0.279 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 76 | 51.70% | 168 | 57.10% | 0.80 (0.54-1.20) | |||
| Sedentariness | ||||||||
| No | 28 | 19.00% | 53 | 18.00% | 0.794 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 119 | 81.00% | 241 | 82.00% | 0.93 (0.56-1.55) | |||
| Obesogenic medication | ||||||||
| No | 104 | 70.70% | 233 | 79.30% | 0.048 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 43 | 29.30% | 61 | 20.70% | 1.58 (1.01-2.49) | |||
Chi-square test's level of significance
> 88 cm for women and > 102 for men;
> 0.85 for women and > 0.95 for men.
Multivariate analysis of sociodemographic characteristics (block 1), clinical characteristics and other exposure factors (block 2), associated with overweight/obesity in young adult students. Maracanaú, CE, Brazil. 2012
| Variables | p | Raw odds ratio | p* | Adjusted odds ratio (95%CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Block 1 | ||||
| Self-reported race | ||||
| Caucasian | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Non-Caucasian | 0.0110 | 0.58 (0.38-0.88) | 0.030 | 0.62 (0.40 – 0.96) |
|
| ||||
| No partner | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Partner | 0.000 | 2.85 (1.79-4.55) | 0.000 | 2.95 (1.82 – 4.78) |
| Schooling | ||||
| High School | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Senior year (Grade 12) | 0.202 | 0.77 (0.51-1.15) | 0.549 | 0.88 (0.57 – 1.34) |
| Block 2 | ||||
| Weight during childhood | ||||
| No overweight | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Overweight | 0.051 | 1.78 (1.01-3.19) | 0.823 | 1.09 (0.52 – 2.26) |
|
| ||||
| No overweight | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Overweight | 0.000 | 7.81 (4.01-15.19) | 0.000 | 6.46 (2.98 – 13.99) |
|
| ||||
| No overweight | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Overweight | 0.010 | 1.78 (1.15-2.76) | 0.374 | 1.28 (0.74 – 2.19) |
|
| ||||
| Normotensive | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Hypertensive | 0.848 | 1.12 (0.37-3.39) | 0.001 | 6.04 (2.10 – 17.38) |
|
| ||||
| Normal | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Altered | 0.000 | 47.03 (14.33-154.36) | 0.000 | 54.47 (13.55 – 219.04) |
|
| ||||
| Normal | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Altered | 0.000 | 2.86 (1.72-4.76) | 0.274 | 0.62 (0.26 – 1.46) |
|
| ||||
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 0.279 | 0.80 (0.54-1.20) | 0.085 | 0.66 (0.41-1.06) |
|
| ||||
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 0.048 | 1.58 (1.01-2.49) | 0.429 | 1.26 (0.71 – 2.22) |
p: Chi-square level of significance
Final model of the logistic regression. Maracanaú, CE, Brazil, 2012
| B (standard error) | Confidence interval of 95% for Exp b | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inferior | Exp b | Superior | ||
|
| ||||
| Constant | -6.59 (0.92) * | |||
|
| 0.89 (0.29) † | 1.40 | 2.44 | 4.27 |
| Weight during adolescence | 1.84 (0.38) * | 2.98 | 6.30 | 13.31 |
| Diastolic blood pressure | 1.96 (0.54) * | 2.49 | 7.11 | 20.28 |
| Abdominal circumference | 3.48 (0.62) * | 9.59 | 32.42 | 109.54 |
Note: R²=0.20 (Hosmer and Lemeshow), 0.28 (Cox & Snell), 0.39 (Nagelkerke). X² model= 143.64, p<0.001.
p<0.001,
p<0.01.