Literature DB >> 26039201

The role of donor-derived veto cells in nonmyeloablative haploidentical HSCT.

N Or-Geva1, Y Reisner1.   

Abstract

Allogeneic HSCT offers a route for achieving immune tolerance via mixed chimerism and remains the sole curative option for many nonmalignant, autoimmune and metabolic diseases. Present-day improvements of nonmyeloablative protocols are increasing the safety of HSCT, thereby widening the target population and resurrecting the interest of HSCT application as a platform for tolerance induction in organ transplantation. Using high cell doses of T-cell-depleted (TCD) grafts has been shown to circumvent graft-vs-host disease, leaving graft rejection as the main hindrance due to the robust host immunity that remains after mild conditioning. In this review we highlight the advantages of utilizing unique non-alloreactive 'veto' cells, such as anti-third party central memory CD8 T cells (Tcm), to enable induction of mixed chimerism after megadose HSCT under nonmyeloablative conditioning. Co-administration of HSCT with veto Tcm allows for induction of mixed chimerism that was successfully translated into immune tolerance, as demonstrated by engraftment of donor-type skin grafts. These veto Tcm cells have been shown to specifically eradicate anti-donor host T cells, through lymph-node sequestration and deletion, thus sparing host immunity and circumventing the need for life-long immunosuppression. Hence, data indicate that this treatment modality of combined TCD HSCT and adoptive transfer of Tcm veto cells under nonmyeloablative conditions may serve as a valuable tool for treatment of patients with a wide array of disorders such as hemoglobinopathies, autoimmune diseases and as a prelude for organ tolerance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26039201     DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2015.89

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  101 in total

1.  Veto activity of activated bone marrow does not require perforin and Fas ligand.

Authors:  P Chrobak; R E Gress
Journal:  Cell Immunol       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 4.868

2.  Homeostatic proliferation is a barrier to transplantation tolerance.

Authors:  Zihao Wu; Steven J Bensinger; Jidong Zhang; Chuangqi Chen; Xueli Yuan; Xiaolun Huang; James F Markmann; Alireza Kassaee; Bruce R Rosengard; Wayne W Hancock; Mohamed H Sayegh; Laurence A Turka
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2003-11-30       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 3.  Translational studies in hematopoietic cell transplantation: treatment of hematologic malignancies as a stepping stone to tolerance induction.

Authors:  Samuel Strober; Thomas R Spitzer; Robert Lowsky; Megan Sykes
Journal:  Semin Immunol       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 11.130

4.  Prevention of allogeneic marrow graft rejection by donor T cells that do not recognize recipient alloantigens: potential role of a veto mechanism.

Authors:  P J Martin
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1996-08-01       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Tolerance induction by veto CTLs in the TCR transgenic 2C mouse model. II. Deletion of effector cells by Fas-Fas ligand apoptosis.

Authors:  Shlomit Reich-Zeliger; Judith Gan; Esther Bachar-Lustig; Yair Reisner
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  Nonmyeloablative haploidentical stem-cell transplantation using anti-CD2 monoclonal antibody (MEDI-507)-based conditioning for refractory hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  Thomas R Spitzer; Steven L McAfee; Bimalangshu R Dey; Christine Colby; James Hope; Howard Grossberg; Frederic Preffer; Juanita Shaffer; Stephen I Alexander; David H Sachs; Megan Sykes
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2003-05-27       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Results of minimally toxic nonmyeloablative transplantation in patients with sickle cell anemia and beta-thalassemia.

Authors:  Robert Iannone; James F Casella; Ephraim J Fuchs; Allen R Chen; Richard J Jones; Ann Woolfrey; Michael Amylon; Keith M Sullivan; Rainer F Storb; Mark C Walters
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  HLA-mismatched renal transplantation without maintenance immunosuppression.

Authors:  Tatsuo Kawai; A Benedict Cosimi; Thomas R Spitzer; Nina Tolkoff-Rubin; Manikkam Suthanthiran; Susan L Saidman; Juanita Shaffer; Frederic I Preffer; Ruchuang Ding; Vijay Sharma; Jay A Fishman; Bimalangshu Dey; Dicken S C Ko; Martin Hertl; Nelson B Goes; Waichi Wong; Winfred W Williams; Robert B Colvin; Megan Sykes; David H Sachs
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Graft rejection in recipients of T-cell-depleted HLA-nonidentical marrow transplants for leukemia. Identification of host-derived antidonor allocytotoxic T lymphocytes.

Authors:  N A Kernan; N Flomenberg; B Dupont; R J O'Reilly
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Race/ethnicity affects the probability of finding an HLA-A, -B, -C and -DRB1 allele-matched unrelated donor and likelihood of subsequent transplant utilization.

Authors:  J Pidala; J Kim; M Schell; S J Lee; R Hillgruber; V Nye; E Ayala; M Alsina; B Betts; R Bookout; H F Fernandez; T Field; F L Locke; T Nishihori; J L Ochoa; L Perez; J Perkins; J Shapiro; C Tate; M Tomblyn; C Anasetti
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 5.483

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.