| Literature DB >> 26038674 |
Sunita Pande1, Prabhu Narain Saxena2, Brijender Bhushan2, Nishi Saxena2.
Abstract
Pyrethroids, commercially available pesticides, are greatly in use these days, and thus they carry considerable chances of contaminating various ecosystems. Haematotoxicity of cypermethrin, a broadly used type II pyrethroid, has been assessed in the present study. Selected parameters included determination of total RBC count, haemoglobin concentration (Hb conc.), packed cell volume (PCV), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (MCHC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), total leukocyte count (TLC), differential leukocyte count (DLC), along with qualitative analysis of blood and bone marrow. Of these parameters, those showing significant decline following cypermethrin intoxication included total RBC count, Hb conc., PCV, MCV, MCH, whereas non-significant decrease was observed in the case of MCHC. ESR, TLC and DLC, on the other hand, increased significantly following cypermethrin intoxication. Qualitative changes included altered red cell morphology such as microcystosis, appearance of stomatocytes, poikilocytosis, giant platelet formation, etc. in peripheral blood and increased erythroid precursors in bone marrow of treated rats. These parameters were however normalised following twenty-two days of recovery phase.Entities:
Keywords: blood; contamination; environment; pyrethroid; toxicity
Year: 2014 PMID: 26038674 PMCID: PMC4427713 DOI: 10.2478/intox-2014-0006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Interdiscip Toxicol ISSN: 1337-6853
Effect of Cypermethrin on Total RBC Count (million/mm3) in Rattus norvegicus.
| S.No. | Treatment | Treatment duration (Days) | No. of rats treated | Dose (mg/kg b.w.) | Range | Mean±S.E. | % change | Significance level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Control | 1 | 6 | – | 6.74–6.83 | 6.77±0.02 | −1.5 |
|
| 2. | Acute | 1 | 6 | 300 | 6.60–6.76 | 6.67±0.07 | ||
| 3. | Control | 7 | 6 | – | 6.68–6.94 | 6.83±0.04 | −1.02 |
|
| 4. | Subchronic | 7 | 6 | 10.7 | 6.52–6.86 | 6.76±0.05 | ||
| 5. | Control | 14 | 6 | – | 6.79–6.93 | 6.87±0.02 | −4.22 |
|
| 6. | Subchronic | 14 | 6 | 10.7 | 6.10–7.05 | 6.58±0.02 | ||
| 7. | Control | 21 | 6 | – | 6.78–6.95 | 6.87±0.03 | −4.37 |
|
| 8. | Subchronic | 21 | 6 | 10.7 | 5.33–6.72 | 6.57±0.21 | ||
| 9. | Control | 28 | 6 | – | 6.75–6.98 | 6.84±0.03 | −4.68 |
|
| 10. | Subchronic | 28 | 6 | 10.7 | 6.42–6.70 | 6.52±0.06 | ||
| Recovery group | ||||||||
| a. | Control | – | 6 | – | 6.74–6.83 | 6.77±0.02 | ±1.46 |
|
| b. | Treated | – | 6 | 10.7 | 6.79–6.93 | 6.87±0.02 | ||
Controls were given groundnut oil only
Recovery group were given oil (a) and cypermethrin (b) treatment for 28 days and effects assessed after 60 days
Effect of Cypermethrin on Differential Leukocyte Count in Rattus norvegicus.
| Cell type | Treatment | No. of days | Control | Treatment | % Change | Significance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Range | Mean±S.E. | Range | Mean±S.E. | |||||
| Neutrophils | Acute | 1 | 24-28 | 26.0±0.78 | 23-27 | 25.28±1.23 | -0.46 | P>0.05 |
| Subchronic | 7 | 26-30 | 28.22±1.73 | 28-41 | 30.12±2.60 | ±6.73 | P<0.05 | |
| 14 | 23-29 | 26.00±1.73 | 32-41 | 36.66±2.60 | ±41 | P<0.05 | ||
| 21 | 28-30 | 29.33±0.67 | 33-36 | 34.33±1.2 | ±17.05 | P<0.01 | ||
| 28 | 27-30 | 28.22±0.63 | 29-33 | 32.0±1.42 | ±13.39 | P<0.01 | ||
| Recovery | 60 | 25-28 | 27.10±0.75 | 24-27 | 26.87±0.65 | -0.52 | P>0.05 | |
| Eosinophils | Acute | 1 | 2-4 | 3.30±0.75 | 2-5 | 4.04±0.64 | ±32.89 | P>0.05 |
| Subchronic | 7 | 2-3 | 2.21±0.47 | 1-3 | 2.46±0.07 | ±11.31 | P>0.05 | |
| 14 | 1-3 | 1.93±0.86 | 2-4 | 2.34±0.98 | ±21.24 | P>0.05 | ||
| 21 | 1-3 | 2.00±0.54 | 1-3 | 2.00±0.54 | - | P>0.05 | ||
| 28 | 2-3 | 2.65±1.16 | 1-3 | 2.00±0.65 | -24 | P>0.05 | ||
| Recovery | 60 | 2-4 | 2.28±0.64 | 1-3 | 1.69±0.81 | -28.99 | P>0.05 | |
| Lymphocytes | Acute | 1 | 65-73 | 70.08±0.57 | 67-72 | 70.68±1.31 | -0.28 | P>0.05 |
| Subchronic | 7 | 67-71 | 69.57±0.45 | 66-70 | 67.42±0.72 | -3.09 | P>0.05 | |
| 14 | 67-72 | 71.40±1.64 | 58-63 | 61.0±0.89 | -14.56 | P>0.05 | ||
| 21 | 67-70 | 68.67±0.88 | 63-64 | 63.67±0.58 | -7.06 | P<0.01 | ||
| 28 | 66-70 | 69.13±0.65 | 63-68 | 64.25±1.63 | -7.06 | P<0.01 | ||
| Recovery | 60 | 65-72 | 70.62±0.97 | 66-72 | 70.70±1.20 | ±0.13 | P>0.05 | |
| Monocytes | Acute | 1 | 00-01 | 0.68±0.35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | No change |
| 7 | 00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | No change | ||
| Subchronic | 14 | 0-1 | 0.62±0.33 | 1-2 | 1.03±0.74 | ±0.53.73 | P>0.05 | |
| 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | No change | ||
| 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | No change | ||
| Recovery | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.73±0.03 | - | P>0.05 | |
Controls were given groundnut oil only
Recovery group were given oil (a) and cypermethrin (b) treatment for 28 days and effects assessed after 60 days
Plate IPhotomicrograph of peripheral blood film of Rattus norvegicus of control group showing normal red blood cells.
Plate XPhotomicrograph of peripheral blood film of Rattus norvegicus after cypermethrin treatment showing hypersegmented neutrophil (HN).
Plate XIPhotomicrograph of bone marrow smear of Rattus norvegicus of control group depicting promyelocyte (PMC) and polychromatic erythroblast (PE).
Plate XVIIPhotomicrograph of bone marrow smear of Rattus norvegicus of recovery group (60 days) showing developing neutrophils (NP), polymorphonuclear eosinophil (PNE) and polymorphonuclear basophil (PNB).
Effect of Cypermethrin on Haemoglobin Concentration (g/dl) in Rattus norvegicus.
| S.No. | Treatment | Treatment duration (Days) | No. of rats treated | Dose (mg/kg b.w.) | Range | Mean±S.E. | % change | Significance level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Control | 1 | 6 | – | 12.2–13.1 | 12.6±0.7 | −4.28 |
|
| 2. | Acute | 1 | 6 | 300 | 10.8–13.4 | 12.06±0.12 | ||
| 3. | Control | 7 | 6 | – | 11.0–13.8 | 12.4±0.16 | −3.22 |
|
| 4. | Subchronic | 7 | 6 | 10.7 | 11.8–12.3 | 12.0±0.08 | ||
| 5. | Control | 14 | 6 | – | 10.0–14.0 | 12.5±0.22 | −7.2 |
|
| 6. | Subchronic | 14 | 6 | 10.7 | 11.0–12.5 | 11.6±0.24 | ||
| 7. | Control | 21 | 6 | – | 10.8–12.6 | 12.2±0.15 | −4.92 |
|
| 8. | Subchronic | 21 | 6 | 10.7 | 9.2–11.4 | 11.6±0.43 | ||
| 9. | Control | 28 | 6 | – | 10.8–12.8 | 12.3±0.17 | −6.5 |
|
| 10. | Subchronic | 28 | 6 | 10.7 | 10.2–12.1 | 11.5±0.31 | ||
| Recovery group | ||||||||
| a. | Control | – | 6 | – | 11.0–13.0 | 12.5±0.22 | ±0.18 |
|
| b. | Treated | – | 6 | 10.7 | 11.2–13.1 | 12.2±0.7 | ||
Controls were given groundnut oil only
Recovery group were given oil (a) and cypermethrin (b) treatment for 28 days and effects assessed after 60 days
Effect of Cypermethrin on Packed Cell Volume (%) in Blood of Rattus norvegicus.
| S.No. | Treatment | Treatment duration (Days) | No. of rats treated | Dose (mg/kg b.w.) | Range | Mean±S.E. | % change | Significance level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Control | 1 | 6 | – | 38–44 | 41.83±0.82 | −5.97 |
|
| 2. | Acute | 1 | 6 | 300 | 36–43 | 39.33±0.23 | ||
| 3. | Control | 7 | 6 | – | 42–44 | 42.67±0.36 | −2.34 |
|
| 4. | Subchronic | 7 | 6 | 10.7 | 38–46 | 41.67±0.36 | ||
| 5. | Control | 14 | 6 | – | 40–46 | 42.5±0.73 | −5.5 |
|
| 6. | Subchronic | 14 | 6 | 10.7 | 38–42 | 40.16±0.71 | ||
| 7. | Control | 21 | 6 | – | 38–45 | 43.33±0.54 | −3.85 |
|
| 8. | Subchronic | 21 | 6 | 10.7 | 36–44 | 41.66±0.78 | ||
| 9. | Control | 28 | 6 | – | 38–45 | 42.67±0.54 | −5.08 |
|
| 10. | Subchronic | 28 | 6 | 10.7 | 38–42 | 40.5±0.68 | ||
| Recovery group | ||||||||
| a. | Control | – | 6 | – | 37–44 | 42.67±0.36 | −1.66 |
|
| b. | Treated | – | 6 | 10.7 | 36–45 | 41.96±0.54 | ||
Controls were given groundnut oil only
Recovery group were given oil (a) and cypermethrin (b) treatment for 28 days and effects assessed after 60 days
Effect of Cypermethrin on Mean Corpuscular Volume (µ3) in Rattus norvegicus.
| S.No. | Treatment | Treatment duration (Days) | No. of rats treated | Dose (mg/kg b.w.) | Range | Mean±S.E. | % change | Significance level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Control | 1 | 6 | – | 58.6–65.8 | 61.8±1.29 | −2.42 |
|
| 2. | Acute | 1 | 6 | 300 | 56.7–61.9 | 60.3±1.13 | ||
| 3. | Control | 7 | 6 | – | 60.1–64.7 | 62.5±0.60 | −1.44 |
|
| 4. | Subchronic | 7 | 6 | 10.7 | 60.0–63.7 | 61.6±0.63 | ||
| 5. | Control | 14 | 6 | – | 59.2–65.2 | 61.8±1.10 | −0.16 |
|
| 6. | Subchronic | 14 | 6 | 10.7 | 59.6–63.9 | 61.7±0.71 | ||
| 7. | Control | 21 | 6 | – | 61.6–66.5 | 64.6±0.89 | −6.34 |
|
| 8. | Subchronic | 21 | 6 | 10.7 | 57.2–63.2 | 60.5±0.91 | ||
| 9. | Control | 28 | 6 | – | 58.5–68.7 | 62.3±1.08 | −3.53 |
|
| 10. | Subchronic | 28 | 6 | 10.7 | 59.2–63.4 | 60.1±1.07 | ||
| Recovery group | ||||||||
| a. | Control | – | 6 | – | 60.1–63.9 | 62.5±0.60 | −1.12 |
|
| b. | Treated | – | 6 | 10.7 | 58.6–65.8 | 61.8±1.29 | ||
Controls were given groundnut oil only
Recovery group were given oil (a) and cypermethrin (b) treatment for 28 days and effects assessed after 60 days
Effect of Cypermethrin on Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (pg) in Rattus norvegicus.
| S.No. | Treatment | Treatment duration (Days) | No. of rats treated | Dose (mg/kg b.w.) | Range | Mean±S.E. | % change | Significance level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Control | 1 | 6 | – | 16.08–22.29 | 18.56±0.39 | −1.96 |
|
| 2. | Acute | 1 | 6 | 300 | 14.88–21.91 | 18.21±0.21 | ||
| 3. | Control | 7 | 6 | – | 13.21–24.76 | 18.58±0.26 | −1.43 | P>0.05 |
| 4. | Subchronic | 7 | 6 | 10.7 | 16.88–22.93 | 18.31±0.18 | ||
| 5. | Control | 14 | 6 | – | 13.12–23.85 | 18.19±0.33 | −2.69 | P<0.05 |
| 6. | Subchronic | 14 | 6 | 10.7 | 14.36–26.61 | 17.70±0.35 | ||
| 7. | Control | 21 | 6 | – | 10.07–38.58 | 18.14±0.24 | −2.92 | P>0.05 |
| 8. | Subchronic | 21 | 6 | 10.7 | 10.99–27.86 | 17.30±0.14 | ||
| 9. | Control | 28 | 6 | – | 16.59–18.60 | 17.91±0.23 | −7.03 | P>0.01 |
| 10. | Subchronic | 28 | 6 | 10.7 | 10.50–23.0 | 16.65±0.18 | ||
| Recovery group | ||||||||
| a. | Control | – | 6 | – | 13.71–28.51 | 17.64±0.35 | ±2.04 | P>0.05 |
| b. | Treated | – | 6 | 10.7 | 14.29–28.56 | 18.0±0.26 | ||
Controls were given groundnut oil only
Recovery group were given oil (a) and cypermethrin (b) treatment for 28 days and effects assessed after 60 days
Effect of Cypermethrin on Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (g/dl) in Rattus norvegicus.
| S.No. | Treatment | Treatment duration (Days) | No. of rats treated | Dose (mg/kg b.w.) | Range | Mean±S.E. | % change | Significance level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Control | 1 | 6 | – | 20.18–32.0 | 29.76±0.61 | ±3.06 | P>0.05 |
| 2. | Acute | 1 | 6 | 300 | 20.0–38.79 | 30.67±0.29 | ||
| 3. | Control | 7 | 6 | – | 22.9–36.47 | 29.14±0.42 | −1.44 | P>0.05 |
| 4. | Subchronic | 7 | 6 | 10.7 | 26.61–29.75 | 28.72±0.37 | ||
| 5. | Control | 14 | 6 | – | 23.57–39.21 | 29.42±0.50 | −1.57 | P>0.05 |
| 6. | Subchronic | 14 | 6 | 10.7 | 25.42–36.52 | 28.97±0.47 | ||
| 7. | Control | 21 | 6 | – | 20.81–49.52 | 28.01±0.43 | −3.07 | P>0.05 |
| 8. | Subchronic | 21 | 6 | 10.7 | 23.55–39.18 | 27.15±0.92 | ||
| 9. | Control | 28 | 6 | – | 26.81–39.73 | 28.78±0.72 | −1.49 | P>0.05 |
| 10. | Subchronic | 28 | 6 | 10.7 | 20.84–40.0 | 28.35±0.47 | ||
| Recovery group | ||||||||
| a. | Control | – | 6 | – | 21.93–38.47 | 29.14±0.42 | ±0.96 | P>0.05 |
| b. | Treated | – | 6 | 10.7 | 19.57–48.29 | 29.42±0.50 | ||
Controls were given groundnut oil only
Recovery group were given oil (a) and cypermethrin (b) treatment for 28 days and effects assessed after 60 days
Effect of Cypermethrin on Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) (mm 1st hour) in Rattus norvegicus.
| S.No. | Treatment | Treatment duration (Days) | No. of rats treated | Dose (mg/kg b.w.) | Range | Mean±S.E. | % change | Significance level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Control | 1 | 6 | – | 1–2 | 1.33±0.23 | ±50.37 | P>0.05 |
| 2. | Acute | 1 | 6 | 300 | 1–3 | 2.0±0.39 | ||
| 3. | Control | 7 | 6 | – | 2–3 | 2.33±0.23 | −21.46 | P>0.05 |
| 4. | Subchronic | 7 | 6 | 10.7 | 1–3 | 1.83±0.34 | ||
| 5. | Control | 14 | 6 | – | 2–2 | 2.0±0.0 | −25.0 | P>0.05 |
| 6. | Subchronic | 14 | 6 | 10.7 | 1–2 | 1.5±0.24 | ||
| 7. | Control | 21 | 6 | – | 1–2 | 1.33±0.26 | ±75.18 | P<0.05 |
| 8. | Subchronic | 21 | 6 | 10.7 | 2–3 | 2.33±0.23 | ||
| 9. | Control | 28 | 6 | – | 2–2 | 2.0±0.0 | 0 | P>0.05 |
| 10. | Subchronic | 28 | 6 | 10.7 | 1–4 | 2.0±0.56 | ||
| Recovery group | ||||||||
| a. | Control | – | 6 | – | 1–3 | 2.0±0.43 | 0 | P>0.05 |
| b. | Treated | – | 6 | 10.7 | 2–2 | 2.0±0.0 | ||
Controls were given groundnut oil only
Recovery group were given oil (a) and cypermethrin (b) treatment for 28 days and effects assessed after 60 days
Effect of Cypermethrin on Total Leukocyte Count (thousand/mm3) in Rattus norvegicus.
| S.No. | Treatment | Treatment duration (Days) | No. of rats treated | Dose (mg/kg b.w.) | Range | Mean±S.E. | % change | Significance level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Control | 1 | 6 | – | 6.2–7.6 | 6.87±0.22 | ±44 | P>0.05 |
| 2. | Acute | 1 | 6 | 300 | 6.6–7.2 | 6.9±0.11 | ||
| 3. | Control | 7 | 6 | – | 6.0–7.2 | 6.7±0.20 | ±4.48 | P>0.05 |
| 4. | Subchronic | 7 | 6 | 10.7 | 6.8–7.4 | 7.0±0.13 | ||
| 5. | Control | 14 | 6 | – | 6.2–7.5 | 6.87±0.91 | ±17.61 | P<0.001 |
| 6. | Subchronic | 14 | 6 | 10.7 | 7.6–8.6 | 8.08±0.13 | ||
| 7. | Control | 21 | 6 | – | 6.0–7.4 | 6.75±0.22 | ±13.77 | P<0.01 |
| 8. | Subchronic | 21 | 6 | 10.7 | 7.6–7.8 | 7.68±0.04 | ||
| 9. | Control | 28 | 6 | – | 6.3–7.6 | 7.05±0.07 | ±12.76 | P<0.01 |
| 10. | Subchronic | 28 | 6 | 10.7 | 7.8–8.2 | 7.95±0.07 | ||
| Recovery group | ||||||||
| a. | Control | – | 6 | – | 6.0–7.4 | 6.75±0.22 | ±1.78 | P>0.05 |
| b. | Treated | – | 6 | 10.7 | 6.2–7.4 | 6.87±0.19 | ||
Controls were given groundnut oil only
Recovery group were given oil (a) and cypermethrin (b) treatment for 28 days and effects assessed after 60 days
Effect of Cypermethrin on Bone Marrow Counts for Myeloid-Erythroid ratio in Rattus norvegicus.
| S.No. | Treatment | Treatment duration (Days) | No. of rats treated | Dose (mg/kg b.w.) | Myeloid | Erythroid | M-E Ratio | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Range | Mean±S.E. | Significance level | Range | Mean±S.E. | Significance level | ||||||
| 1. | Control | 1 | 6 | – | 70–77 | 74±0.23 | P>0.05 | 20–32 | 26±0.76 | P>0.05 | 2.84:1 |
| 2. | Acute | 1 | 6 | 300 | 68–75 | 72±0.61 | 21–32 | 28±0.57 | 2.57:1 | ||
| 3. | Control | 7 | 6 | – | 64–80 | 75±0.77 | P<0.05 | 22–29 | 25±0.98 | P<0.05 | 3:1 |
| 4. | Subchronic | 7 | 6 | 10.7 | 61–73 | 67±0.85 | 25–36 | 33±0.73 | 2.03: | ||
| 5. | Control | 14 | 6 | – | 64–80 | 74±0.26 | P<0.05 | 20–31 | 26±0.31 | P<0.05 | 2.84:1 |
| 6. | Subchronic | 14 | 6 | 10.7 | 58–69 | 65±0.53 | 31–39 | 35±0.24 | 1.85:1 | ||
| 7. | Control | 21 | 6 | – | 65–82 | 73±0.42 | P<0.05 | 22–29 | 27±1.21 | P<0.05 | 2.70:1 |
| 8. | Subchronic | 21 | 6 | 10.7 | 54–65 | 61±0.96 | 25–42 | 39±0.64 | 1.56:1 | ||
| 9. | Control | 28 | 6 | – | 70–79 | 76±1.04 | P<0.01 | 19–28 | 24±1.02 | P<0.01 | 3.16:1 |
| 10. | Subchronic | 28 | 6 | 10.7 | 48–57 | 55±0.75 | 38–49 | 45±0.43 | 1.2:1 | ||
| Recovery group | |||||||||||
| a. | Control | – | 6 | – | 72–78 | 75±0.98 | P>0.05 | 21–28 | 25±0.57 | P>0.05 | 3:1 |
| b. | Treated | – | 6 | 10.7 | 71–80 | 76±1.10 | 20–26 | 24±0.98 | 3.16:1 | ||
Controls were given groundnut oil only
Recovery group were given oil (a) and cypermethrin (b) treatment for 28 days and effects assessed after 60 days