Literature DB >> 26038551

Identification of mechanistically distinct inhibitors of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase through fragment screening.

Jennifer La1, Catherine F Latham2, Ricky N Tinetti3, Adam Johnson2, David Tyssen2, Kelly D Huber4, Nicolas Sluis-Cremer4, Jamie S Simpson5, Stephen J Headey5, David K Chalmers5, Gilda Tachedjian6.   

Abstract

Fragment-based screening methods can be used to discover novel active site or allosteric inhibitors for therapeutic intervention. Using saturation transfer difference (STD) NMR and in vitro activity assays, we have identified fragment-sized inhibitors of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) with distinct chemical scaffolds and mechanisms compared to nonnucleoside RT inhibitors (NNRTIs) and nucleoside/nucleotide RT inhibitors (NRTIs). Three compounds were found to inhibit RNA- and DNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity of HIV-1 RT in the micromolar range while retaining potency against RT variants carrying one of three major NNRTI resistance mutations: K103N, Y181C, or G190A. These compounds also inhibit Moloney murine leukemia virus RT but not the Klenow fragment of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I. Steady-state kinetic analyses demonstrate that one of these fragments is a competitive inhibitor of HIV-1 RT with respect to deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate (dNTP) substrate, whereas a second compound is a competitive inhibitor of RT polymerase activity with respect to the DNA template/primer (T/P), and consequently also inhibits RNase H activity. The dNTP competing RT inhibitor retains activity against the NRTI-resistant mutants K65R and M184V, demonstrating a drug resistance profile distinct from the nucleotide competing RT inhibitors indolopyridone-1 (INDOPY-1) and 4-dimethylamino-6-vinylpyrimidine-1 (DAVP-1). In antiviral assays, the T/P competing compound inhibits HIV-1 replication at a step consistent with an RT inhibitor. Screening of additional structurally related compounds to the three fragments led to the discovery of molecules with improved potency against HIV-1 RT. These fragment inhibitors represent previously unidentified scaffolds for development of novel drugs for HIV-1 prevention or treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HIV; STD-NMR; allosteric inhibitors; fragment-based drug discovery; reverse transcriptase

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26038551      PMCID: PMC4460473          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1423900112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  34 in total

1.  A 'rule of three' for fragment-based lead discovery?

Authors:  Miles Congreve; Robin Carr; Chris Murray; Harren Jhoti
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 7.851

2.  The determination of enzyme inhibitor constants.

Authors:  M DIXON
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1953-08       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  Ligand efficiency: a useful metric for lead selection.

Authors:  Andrew L Hopkins; Colin R Groom; Alexander Alex
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 7.851

4.  Aptamer displacement identifies alternative small-molecule target sites that escape viral resistance.

Authors:  Satoko Yamazaki; Lu Tan; Günter Mayer; Jörg S Hartig; Jin-Na Song; Sandra Reuter; Tobias Restle; Sandra D Laufer; Dina Grohmann; Hans-Georg Kräusslich; Jürgen Bajorath; Michael Famulok
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  2007-07

5.  Integrated biophysical approach to fragment screening and validation for fragment-based lead discovery.

Authors:  Hernani Leonardo Silvestre; Thomas L Blundell; Chris Abell; Alessio Ciulli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  NMR methods in fragment screening: theory and a comparison with other biophysical techniques.

Authors:  Claudio Dalvit
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 7.851

7.  Collective motions in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase: examination of flexibility and enzyme function.

Authors:  I Bahar; B Erman; R L Jernigan; A R Atilgan; D G Covell
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-01-22       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Parallel screening of low molecular weight fragment libraries: do differences in methodology affect hit identification?

Authors:  Jerome Wielens; Stephen J Headey; David I Rhodes; Roger J Mulder; Olan Dolezal; John J Deadman; Janet Newman; David K Chalmers; Michael W Parker; Thomas S Peat; Martin J Scanlon
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2012-11-08

Review 9.  Murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase: structural comparison with HIV-1 reverse transcriptase.

Authors:  Marie L Coté; Monica J Roth
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 3.303

10.  2014 Update of the drug resistance mutations in HIV-1.

Authors:  Annemarie M Wensing; Vincent Calvez; Huldrych F Günthard; Victoria A Johnson; Roger Paredes; Deenan Pillay; Robert W Shafer; Douglas D Richman
Journal:  Top Antivir Med       Date:  2014 Jun-Jul
View more
  2 in total

1.  Identification of allosteric binding sites for PI3Kα oncogenic mutant specific inhibitor design.

Authors:  Michelle S Miller; Sweta Maheshwari; Fiona M McRobb; Kenneth W Kinzler; L Mario Amzel; Bert Vogelstein; Sandra B Gabelli
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 2.  Avoiding Drug Resistance in HIV Reverse Transcriptase.

Authors:  Maria E Cilento; Karen A Kirby; Stefan G Sarafianos
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 60.622

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.