Literature DB >> 26038193

Both tumor depth and diameter are predictive of sentinel lymph node status and survival in Merkel cell carcinoma.

Franz O Smith1, Binglin Yue2, Suroosh S Marzban3, Brooke L Walls4, Michael Carr3, Ryan S Jackson5, Christopher A Puleo1, Tapan Padhya5, C Wayne Cruse1, Ricardo J Gonzalez1, Amod A Sarnaik1, Michael J Schell2, Ronald C DeConti1, Jane L Messina1,6, Vernon K Sondak1, Jonathan S Zager1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purposes of this study were 1) to determine the impact of primary tumor-related factors on the prediction of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) status and 2) to identify clinical and pathologic factors associated with survival in Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC).
METHODS: An institutional review board-approved, retrospective review of patients with MCC treated between 1988 and 2011 at a single center was performed. Patients were categorized into 5 groups: 1) negative SLN, 2) positive SLN, 3) clinically node-negative but SLN biopsy not performed, 4) regional nodal disease without a known primary tumor, and 5) primary MCC with synchronous clinically evident regional nodal disease. Factors predictive of the SLN status were analyzed with logistic regressions, and overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were analyzed with Cox models and competing risk models assuming proportional hazards, respectively.
RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-five patients were analyzed, and 70% were male; the median age was 75 years. The median tumor diameter was 1.5 cm (range, 0.2-12.5 cm), and the median tumor depth was 4.8 mm (range, 0.3-45.0 mm). One hundred ninety-one patients underwent SLN biopsy, and 59 (31%) were SLN-positive. Increasing primary tumor diameter and increasing tumor depth were associated with SLN positivity (P = .007 and P = .017, respectively). Age and sex were not associated with the SLN status. Immunosuppression, increasing tumor diameter, and increasing tumor depth were associated with worse OS (P = .007, P = .003, and P = .025, respectively). DSS differed significantly by group and was best for patients with a negative SLN and worst for those with primary MCC and synchronous clinically evident nodal disease (P = .018).
CONCLUSION: For patients with MCC, increasing primary tumor diameter and increasing tumor depth are independently predictive of a positive SLN, worse OS, and worse DSS. Tumor depth should be routinely reported when primary MCC specimens are being evaluated histopathologically.
© 2015 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Merkel cell carcinoma; sentinel lymph node; survival; tumor depth; tumor diameter

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26038193      PMCID: PMC4904725          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  29 in total

1.  Recurrence after complete resection and selective use of adjuvant therapy for stage I through III Merkel cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ryan C Fields; Klaus J Busam; Joanne F Chou; Katherine S Panageas; Melissa P Pulitzer; Peter J Allen; Dennis H Kraus; Mary S Brady; Daniel G Coit
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Pathologic nodal evaluation improves prognostic accuracy in Merkel cell carcinoma: analysis of 5823 cases as the basis of the first consensus staging system.

Authors:  Bianca D Lemos; Barry E Storer; Jayasri G Iyer; Jerri Linn Phillips; Christopher K Bichakjian; L Christine Fang; Timothy M Johnson; Nanette J Liegeois-Kwon; Clark C Otley; Kelly G Paulson; Merrick I Ross; Siegrid S Yu; Nathalie C Zeitouni; David R Byrd; Vernon K Sondak; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Arthur J Sober; Paul Nghiem
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 11.527

3.  Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in Merkel's cell carcinoma.

Authors:  J Ortin-Perez; M C van Rijk; R A Valdes-Olmos; S Vidal-Sicart; O E Nieweg; A Vilalta; B B R Kroon; F Pons
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 4.424

4.  Routine omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy for merkel cell carcinoma <= 1 cm is not justified.

Authors:  Amod A Sarnaik; Jonathan S Zager; L Elizabeth Cox; Tatiana M Ochoa; Jane L Messina; Vernon K Sondak
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Increasing tumor thickness is associated with recurrence and poorer survival in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Cathy S Lim; Deborah Whalley; Lauren E Haydu; Rajmohan Murali; Jill Tippett; John F Thompson; George Hruby; Richard A Scolyer
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Effect of host, tumor, diagnostic, and treatment variables on outcomes in a large cohort with Merkel cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Maryam M Asgari; Monica M Sokil; E Margaret Warton; Jayasri Iyer; Kelly G Paulson; Paul Nghiem
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 10.282

7.  Clinical characteristics of Merkel cell carcinoma at diagnosis in 195 patients: the AEIOU features.

Authors:  Michelle Heath; Natalia Jaimes; Bianca Lemos; Arash Mostaghimi; Linda C Wang; Pablo F Peñas; Paul Nghiem
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 11.527

8.  Cytokeratin 20 in human carcinomas. A new histodiagnostic marker detected by monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  R Moll; A Löwe; J Laufer; W W Franke
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.307

9.  Merkel cell carcinoma: histologic features and prognosis.

Authors:  Aleodor A Andea; Daniel G Coit; Bijal Amin; Klaus J Busam
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Prognostic value of tumor thickness in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Stephanie R Goldberg; James P Neifeld; William J Frable
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 3.454

View more
  12 in total

1.  Molecular Profiling of Multiple Primary Merkel Cell Carcinoma to Distinguish Genetically Distinct Tumors From Clonally Related Metastases.

Authors:  Kelly L Harms; Lorena Lazo de la Vega; Daniel H Hovelson; Samantha Rahrig; Andi K Cani; Chia-Jen Liu; Douglas R Fullen; Min Wang; Aleodor A Andea; Christopher K Bichakjian; Timothy M Johnson; Scott A Tomlins; Paul W Harms
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 10.282

2.  An Internally Validated Prognostic Risk-Score Model for Disease-Specific Survival in Clinical Stage I and II Merkel Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Adrienne B Shannon; Richard J Straker; Michael J Carr; James Sun; Karenia Landa; Kirsten Baecher; Kevin Lynch; Harrison G Bartels; Robyn Panchaud; Luke J Keele; Michael C Lowe; Craig L Slingluff; Mark J Jameson; Kenneth Y Tsai; Mark B Faries; Georgia M Beasley; Vernon K Sondak; Giorgos C Karakousis; Jonathan S Zager; John T Miura
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.339

3.  Merkel Cell Carcinoma, Version 1.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Authors:  Christopher K Bichakjian; Thomas Olencki; Sumaira Z Aasi; Murad Alam; James S Andersen; Rachel Blitzblau; Glen M Bowen; Carlo M Contreras; Gregory A Daniels; Roy Decker; Jeffrey M Farma; Kris Fisher; Brian Gastman; Karthik Ghosh; Roy C Grekin; Kenneth Grossman; Alan L Ho; Karl D Lewis; Manisha Loss; Daniel D Lydiatt; Jane Messina; Kishwer S Nehal; Paul Nghiem; Igor Puzanov; Chrysalyne D Schmults; Ashok R Shaha; Valencia Thomas; Yaohui G Xu; John A Zic; Karin G Hoffmann; Anita M Engh
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 12.693

4.  Patterns of Metastasis in Merkel Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yun Song; Feredun S Azari; Rebecca Tang; Adrienne B Shannon; John T Miura; Douglas L Fraker; Giorgos C Karakousis
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 4.339

5.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy in periocular merkel cell carcinoma: a case report.

Authors:  Dan C Filitis; Gyorgy Paragh; Faramarz H Samie; Nathalie C Zeitouni
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-09-20

6.  Analysis of Prognostic Factors from 9387 Merkel Cell Carcinoma Cases Forms the Basis for the New 8th Edition AJCC Staging System.

Authors:  Kelly L Harms; Mark A Healy; Paul Nghiem; Arthur J Sober; Timothy M Johnson; Christopher K Bichakjian; Sandra L Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 7.  Merkel Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Recommendations for Diagnostics and Treatment.

Authors:  Urs Dietmar Achim Müller-Richter; Anja Gesierich; Alexander Christian Kübler; Stefan Hartmann; Roman Camillus Brands
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Eye Comfort and Physiological Reconstruction of an Entire Upper Eyelid Defect.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Sakata; Katsuya Okuda; Yoshitaka Wada; Shinji Kumegawa; Hirohisa Kusuhara; Noritaka Isogai; Shinichi Asamura
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2020-05-29

Review 9.  Merkel Cell Carcinoma: New Trends.

Authors:  Ellen M Zwijnenburg; Satish F K Lubeek; Johanna E M Werner; Avital L Amir; Willem L J Weijs; Robert P Takes; Sjoert A H Pegge; Carla M L van Herpen; Gosse J Adema; Johannes H A M Kaanders
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Treatment of Locally Advanced Merkel Cell Carcinoma-A Multi-Center Study.

Authors:  Monika Dudzisz-Sledz; Paweł Sobczuk; Katarzyna Kozak; Tomasz Switaj; Hanna Kosela-Paterczyk; Anna Malgorzata Czarnecka; Slawomir Falkowski; Paweł Rogala; Tadeusz Morysinski; Mateusz Jacek Spalek; Marcin Zdzienicki; Tomasz Goryn; Marcin Zietek; Bozena Cybulska-Stopa; Stanisław Klek; Grazyna Kaminska-Winciorek; Barbara Ziolkowska; Anna Szumera-Cieckiewicz; Piotr Rutkowski
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.