| Literature DB >> 26037730 |
Hyo-Jung Kwon1, Jun-Yong Choi2, Myeong Soo Lee3, Yong-Suk Kim4, Byung-Cheul Shin5, Jong-In Kim6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Incomplete recovery from facial palsy results in social and physical disabilities, and the medical options for the sequelae of Bell's palsy are limited. Acupuncture is widely used for Bell's palsy patients in East Asia, but its efficacy is unclear.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26037730 PMCID: PMC4507312 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-0777-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trials ISSN: 1745-6215 Impact factor: 2.279
Acupuncture points and needling procedure
| Acupuncture point | Rationale | Direction | Manipulation method | Depth (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ST4 (unaffected side) | Dispel wind and relieve pain indirectly in affected buccal side | Transversely toward ST6 | Mild reinforcing-reducing method using clockwise-counterclockwise rotation of needle until de-qi is achieved | 20–30 |
| ST6 (unaffected side) | Dispel wind and relieve pain indirectly in affected buccal side | Transversely toward ST4 | Mild reinforcing-reducing method using clockwise-counterclockwise rotation of needle until de-qi is achieved | 20–30 |
| ST1 (affected side) | Facilitate movement in affected infra-orbital lesion | Transversely toward the eye | Mild reinforcing-reducing method using clockwise-counterclockwise rotation of needle until de-qi is achieved | 5–10 |
| EX-HN4 (affected side) | Facilitate movement in affected supra-orbital lesion | Transversely toward the eye | Mild reinforcing-reducing method using clockwise-counterclockwise rotation of needle until de-qi is achieved | 5–10 |
| TE23 (affected side) | Facilitate movement in affected supra-orbital lesion | Transversely toward the ear | Mild reinforcing-reducing method using clockwise-counterclockwise rotation of needle until de-qi is achieved | 20–30 |
| LI20 (affected side) | Facilitate movement in affected nasolabial lesion | Obliquely along the nasolabial sulcus toward the root of the nose | Mild reinforcing-reducing method using clockwise-counterclockwise rotation of needle until de-qi is achieved | 20–30 |
| TE17 (both sides) | Benefit head or face and ears | Perpendicular to skin | Mild reinforcing-reducing method using clockwise-counterclockwise rotation of needle until de-qi is achieved | 20–30 |
| ST9 (both sides) | Regulate Qi and blood of whole body | Perpendicular to skin | Mild reinforcing-reducing method using clockwise-counterclockwise rotation of needle until de-qi is achieved | 20–30 |
| LI10 (both sides) | Regulate Qi and blood of whole body | Perpendicular to skin | Reinforcing method using clockwise rotation of needle until de-qi is achieved for tonification | 20–30 |
| LI4 (both sides) | Regulate face and head area, tonify Qi | Perpendicular to skin | Reinforcing method using clockwise rotation of needle until de-qi is achieved for tonification | 20–30 |
| ST36 (both sides) | Tonify Qi and blood of whole body | Perpendicular to skin | Reinforcing method using clockwise rotation of needle until de-qi is achieved for tonification | 20–30 |
| GB34 (both sides) | Treat soft tissue anywhere in body; treat contractions, cramp, pain, spasm, weakness, numbness, paralysis | Perpendicular to skin | Reinforcing method using clockwise rotation of needle until de-qi is achieved for tonification | 20–30 |
Fig. 1Trial flow
Baseline characteristics of participants
| Acupuncture group ( | Control group ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex: | |||
| Male ( | 14 | 4 | 0.31b |
| Female ( | 12 | 9 | |
| Affected side: | |||
| Left ( | 6 | 7 | 0.07b |
| Right ( | 20 | 6 | |
| Age (years, mean (SD)) | 50.85 (10.48) | 50.54 (11.48) | 0.93 |
| Blood pressure (mmHg): | |||
| Systolic | 133.31 (18.31) | 124.8 (18.03) | 0.18 |
| Diastolic | 77.46 (12.87) | 79.08 (12.57) | 0.71 |
| Duration of facial palsy (months, mean (SD)) | 94.27 (78.70) | 126.15 (119.73) | 0.32 |
| Facial Disability Index, social score (mean (SD)) | 52.77 (16.04) | 52.30 (18.36) | 0.94 |
| Facial Disability Index, physical score (mean (SD)) | 46.35 (14.25) | 51.15 (14.31) | 0.33 |
| Sunnybrook Facial Nerve Grading (mean (SD)) | 28.19 (21.45) | 25.23 (15.30) | 0.66 |
| House–Brackmann grade: | |||
| Mild to moderate dysfunction (2–3) | 17 | 7 | 0.51b |
| Moderately severe to severe dysfunction (4–5) | 9 | 6 | |
| Lip mobility: | |||
| Lip length index (mean (SD)) | 22.56 (8.62) | 17.23 (6.76) | 0.06 |
| Snout index (mean (SD)) | 27.93 (7.94) | 21.06 (9.31) | 0.02 |
| Facial stiffnessc (mean (SD)) | 4.19 (0.85) | 4.00 (0.91) | 0.52 |
SD, standard deviation
aIndependent two-sample t test, unless indicated otherwise
bFisher’s exact test
cNumerical rating scale from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates no stiffness and 5 indicates very stiff
Outcome changes in acupuncture and waiting list groups
| Change from baseline (mean (SD)) | Mean difference (95 % confidence interval) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acupuncture group, | Control group, | |||
| Facial Disability Index, social score | Week 5 | 18.92 (18.61) | −0.62 (12.95) | 19.54 (7.83, 31.22) |
| Week 8 | 21.69 (21.47) | −1.85(11.10) | 23.54 (12.99, 34.08) | |
| Facial Disability Index, physical score | Week 5 | 23.65 (19.47) | −0.38 (12.98) | 24.04 (13.37, 34.71) |
| Week 8 | 26.16 (21.65) | 4.62 (16.89) | 21.54 (7.62, 35.46) | |
| Sunnybrook Facial Nerve Grading | Week 5 | 20.92 (16.81) | 6.54 (7.26) | 14.38 (6.55, 22.21) |
| Week 8 | 24.54 (16.24) | 9.77 (8.07) | 14.77 (5.05, 24.49) | |
| House–Brackmann grade | Week 5 | −0.42 (0.86) | −0.15 (0.99) | −0.27 (−0.88, 0.35) |
| Week 8 | −0.62 (0.85) | −0.38 (0.96) | −0.23 (−0.93, 0.40) | |
| Lip mobility | ||||
| Lip length index | Week 5 | 0.67 (4.36) | −1.72 (7.41) | 3.39 (0.31, 6.48)a |
| Week 8 | 1.00 (7.12) | −0.25 (4.45) | 2.83 (−1.51, 7.16)a | |
| Snout index | Week 5 | 1.84 (5.94) | 1.28 (3.23) | 2.15 (−1.49, 5.80)a |
| Week 8 | 2.36 (6.81) | −0.80 (4.49) | 5.05 (0.76, 9.33)a | |
| Facial stiffnessb | Week 5 | −1.35 (1.09) | −0.08 (0.64) | −1.27 (−1.94, −0.60) |
| Week 8 | −1.58 (1.27) | 0.00 (0.82) | −1.58 (−2.26, −0.89) | |
SD, standard deviation
aAdjusted for baseline values because of significant or marginally significant baseline differences
bNumerical-rating scale from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates no stiffness and 5 indicates very stiff
House–Brackmann grade change within groups
| Baseline | Week 5 | Week 8 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acupuncture group | House–Brackmann grade: | |||
| Mild to moderate dysfunction (2–3) | 17 | 22 | 23 | |
| Moderately severe to severe dysfunction (4–5) | 9 | 4 (improved, 5; aggravated, 0) | 3 (improved, 6; aggravated, 0) | |
|
| 0.07a | 0.04a | ||
| Control group | House–Brackmann grade: | |||
| Mild to moderate dysfunction (2–3) | 7 | 9 | 9 | |
| Moderately severe to severe dysfunction (4–5) | 6 | 4 (improved, 3; aggravated, 1) | 4 (improved, 3; aggravated, 1) | |
|
| 0.61 | 0.61 |
aMcNemar’s test between follow-up and baseline test