Literature DB >> 26037538

Nodal Upstaging in Robotic and Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy for Clinical N0 Lung Cancer.

Benjamin E Lee1, Mark Shapiro2, John R Rutledge3, Robert J Korst2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent multiinstitutional published data have demonstrated increased pathologic nodal upstaging by robotic lobectomy compared with historical video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy data. To eliminate potential variability from multiple surgical techniques, we compared the rate of nodal upstaging at a single institution where robotic and VATS lobectomy are both performed.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinically node-negative patients with lung cancer undergoing VATS or robotic lobectomy. Clinical data were recorded in concordance with The Society of Thoracic Surgeons database elements. The rates of pathologic nodal upstaging as well as disease-free and overall survival were calculated.
RESULTS: A total of 211 patients underwent anatomic lobectomy by VATS (n = 158) or robotics (n = 53) from 2009 to 2014. The two groups were statistically similar in their clinical stage, tumor size, location, and histologic evaluation. Within the VATS group, 24 patients experienced nodal upstaging (15.2%), with 13 patients having pN1 disease, and 11 patients having pN2 disease. The robotics group contained 7 patients (13.2%) with nodal upstaging, with 5 patients exhibiting pN1 disease and 2 patients with pN2 disease. When VATS and robotics were compared, there was no significant difference in pathologic upstaging (p = 0.72), 2-year overall survival (88% vs 95%, respectively; p = 0.40), or 2-year disease-free survival (83% vs 93%, respectively; p = 0.48).
CONCLUSIONS: In this comparison of robotic and VATS lobectomy for clinically node-negative lung cancer that was managed with consistent surgical technique and pathologic evaluation, the rate of nodal upstaging achieved by robotics appears similar to VATS. In addition, there were no appreciable differences in disease-free or overall survival.
Copyright © 2015 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26037538     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  19 in total

1.  The association of nodal upstaging with surgical approach and its impact on long-term survival after resection of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Mark W Hennon; Luke H DeGraaff; Adrienne Groman; Todd L Demmy; Sai Yendamuri
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 4.191

2.  Comparison of robotic and video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.

Authors:  Feichao Bao; Chong Zhang; Yunhai Yang; Zhehao He; Luming Wang; Jian Hu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Cons: should a patient with stage IA non-small cell lung cancer undergo invasive mediastinal staging?

Authors:  Herbert Decaluwé; Christophe Dooms
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2016-06

Review 4.  Why comprehensive adoption of robotic assisted thoracic surgery is ideal for both simple and complex lung resections.

Authors:  Michael Mazzei; Abbas E Abbas
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Long-Term Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted, Video-Assisted and Open Surgery in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Monica Casiraghi; Alessio Vincenzo Mariolo; Shehab Mohamed; Giulia Sedda; Patrick Maisonneuve; Antonio Mazzella; Giorgio Lo Iacono; Francesco Petrella; Lorenzo Spaggiari
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 6.  Nodal upstaging: effects of instrumentation and three-dimensional view in clinical stage I lung cancer.

Authors:  Alper Toker; Mehmet Oğuzhan Özyurtkan; Erkan Kaba
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-05-30

7.  Robotic lobectomy for lung cancer: initial experience of a single institution in Korea.

Authors:  Seha Ahn; Jin Yong Jeong; Hyung Woo Kim; Joong Hyun Ahn; Giyong Noh; Soo Seog Park
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-03

8.  Comparison of robotic-assisted lobectomy with video-assisted thoracic surgery for stage IIB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Chongwu Li; Yingjie Hu; Jia Huang; Jiantao Li; Long Jiang; Hao Lin; Peiji Lu; Qingquan Luo
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2019-12

9.  Comparison between robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for mediastinal and hilar lymph node dissection in lung cancer surgery.

Authors:  Tomohiro Haruki; Yuzo Takagi; Yasuaki Kubouchi; Yoshiteru Kidokoro; Atsuyuki Nakanishi; Yuji Nozaka; Yuki Oshima; Shinji Matsui; Hiroshige Nakamura
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-08-18

10.  Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung resection: the first Canadian series.

Authors:  Christine Fahim; Waël Hanna; Thomas Waddell; Yaron Shargall; Kazuhiro Yasufuku
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.089

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.