Literature DB >> 26037216

Non-contraceptive benefits of hormonal and intrauterine reversible contraceptive methods.

Luis Bahamondes1, M Valeria Bahamondes2, Lee P Shulman3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most contraceptive methods present benefits beyond contraception; however, despite a large body of evidence, many healthcare professionals (HCPs), users and potential users are unaware of those benefits. This review evaluates the evidence for non-contraceptive benefits of hormonal and non-hormonal contraceptive methods.
METHODS: We searched the medical publications in PubMed, POPLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE and LILACS for relevant articles, on non-contraceptive benefits of the use of hormonal and intrauterine reversible contraceptive methods, which were published in English between 1980 and July 2014. Articles were identified using the following search terms: 'contraceptive methods', 'benefits', 'cancer', 'anaemia', 'heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB)', 'endometrial hyperplasia', 'endometriosis' and 'leiomyoma'.
RESULTS: We identified, through the literature search, evidence that some combined oral contraceptives have benefits in controlling HMB and anaemia, reducing the rate of endometrial, ovarian and colorectal cancer and ectopic pregnancy as well as alleviating symptoms of premenstrual dysphoric disorder. Furthermore, the use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system also controls HMB and anaemia and endometrial hyperplasia and cancer, reduces rates of endometrial polyps in users of tamoxifen and alleviates pain associated with endometriosis and adenomyosis. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate controls crises of pain associated with sickle cell disease and endometriosis. Users of the etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant have the benefits of a reduction of pain associated with endometriosis, and users of the copper intrauterine device have reduced rates of endometrial and cervical cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high contraceptive effectiveness of many hormonal and intrauterine reversible contraceptive methods, many HCPs, users and potential users are concerned mainly about side effects and safety of both hormonal and non-hormonal contraceptive methods, and there is scarce information about the many benefits that these methods offer beyond contraception.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  copper intrauterine device; depot medroxyprogesterone acetate; levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system; non-contraceptive benefits; oral contraceptives

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26037216     DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmv023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod Update        ISSN: 1355-4786            Impact factor:   15.610


  25 in total

1.  Regulatory approval time for hormonal contraception in Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom, 2000-2015: a retrospective data analysis.

Authors:  Christine Troskie; Judith A Soon; Arianne Y Albert; Wendy V Norman
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2016-11-03

2.  Closing the Gap between Need and Uptake: a Case for Proactive Contraception Provision to Adolescents.

Authors:  Rebecca Duncan; Lynley Anderson; Neil Pickering
Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev       Date:  2019-04-02

3.  Weight change among women using intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, a copper intrauterine device, or a levonorgestrel implant for contraception did not influence early discontinuation.

Authors:  Luis Bahamondes
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-04-14

Review 4.  Extraterrestrial Gynecology: Could Spaceflight Increase the Risk of Developing Cancer in Female Astronauts? An Updated Review.

Authors:  Rosa Drago-Ferrante; Riccardo Di Fiore; Fathi Karouia; Yashwanth Subbannayya; Saswati Das; Begum Aydogan Mathyk; Shehbeel Arif; Ana Paula Guevara-Cerdán; Allen Seylani; Aman Singh Galsinh; Weronika Kukulska; Joseph Borg; Sherif Suleiman; David Marshall Porterfield; Andrea Camera; Lane K Christenson; April Elizabeth Ronca; Jonathan G Steller; Afshin Beheshti; Jean Calleja-Agius
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 6.208

5.  What happens when you stop using the combined contraceptive pill? A qualitative study protocol on consequences and supply needs for women who discontinued the combined contraceptive pill in Germany.

Authors:  Jana Niemann; Liane Schenk; Gertraud Stadler; Matthias Richter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.006

6.  A novel vaginal pH regulator: results from the phase 3 AMPOWER contraception clinical trial.

Authors:  Michael A Thomas; B Todd Chappell; Bassem Maximos; Kelly R Culwell; Clint Dart; Brandon Howard
Journal:  Contracept X       Date:  2020-07-01

Review 7.  Hormonal Contraception and Depression: Updated Evidence and Implications in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Franca Fruzzetti; Tiziana Fidecicchi
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 2.859

8.  Contraceptive conundrums: A case report of a woman with migraine.

Authors:  Lisa M Wood; Stephanie M Massey; Karen M Townsend; Kay C Petersen; Nathan P Young; Jennifer A Bold; Kellen V Lambeau
Journal:  Nurse Pract       Date:  2020-08

Review 9.  Safety and Benefits of Contraceptives Implants: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Morena Luigia Rocca; Anna Rita Palumbo; Federica Visconti; Costantino Di Carlo
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-08

Review 10.  Hormonal contraception in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: choices, challenges, and noncontraceptive benefits.

Authors:  Anderson Sanches de Melo; Rosana Maria Dos Reis; Rui Alberto Ferriani; Carolina Sales Vieira
Journal:  Open Access J Contracept       Date:  2017-02-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.