Literature DB >> 26036862

New evidence of factor structure and measurement invariance of the SDQ across five European nations.

Javier Ortuño-Sierra1, Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero2, Rebeca Aritio-Solana2, Alvaro Moreno Velasco2, Edurne Chocarro de Luis2, Gunter Schumann3,4, Anna Cattrell3,4, Herta Flor5, Frauke Nees5, Tobias Banaschewski6, Arun Bokde7, Rob Whelan7, Christian Buechel8, Uli Bromberg8, Patricia Conrod3,9, Vincent Frouin10, Dimitri Papadopoulos10, Juergen Gallinat11, Hugh Garavan12, Andreas Heinz11, Henrik Walter11, Maren Struve13,14, Penny Gowland15, Tomáš Paus16, Luise Poustka6, Jean-Luc Martinot17, Marie-Laure Paillère-Martinot17, Nora C Vetter18, Michael N Smolka19, Claire Lawrence19.   

Abstract

The main purpose of the present study was to analyse the internal structure and to test the measurement invariance of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), self-reported version, in five European countries. The sample consisted of 3012 adolescents aged between 12 and 17 years (M = 14.20; SD = 0.83). The five-factor model (with correlated errors added), and the five-factor model (with correlated errors added) with the reverse-worded items allowed to cross-load on the Prosocial subscale, displayed adequate goodness of-fit indices. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis showed that the five-factor model (with correlated errors added) had partial strong measurement invariance by countries. A total of 11 of the 25 items were non-invariant across samples. The level of internal consistency of the Total difficulties score was 0.84, ranging between 0.69 and 0.78 for the SDQ subscales. The findings indicate that the SDQ's subscales need to be modified in various ways for screening emotional and behavioural problems in the five European countries that were analysed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescents; Behavioural problems; Factorial structure; Measurement invariance; SDQ; Self-report

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26036862     DOI: 10.1007/s00787-015-0729-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry        ISSN: 1018-8827            Impact factor:   4.785


  41 in total

Review 1.  Adolescent development: challenges and opportunities for research, programs, and policies.

Authors:  R M Lerner; N L Galambos
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note.

Authors:  R Goodman
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 8.982

3.  Does the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire - self report yield invariant measurements across different nations? Data from the International Child Mental Health Study Group.

Authors:  D Stevanovic; R Urbán; O Atilola; P Vostanis; Y P Singh Balhara; M Avicenna; H Kandemir; R Knez; T Franic; P Petrov
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 6.892

Review 4.  Global burden of disease in young people aged 10-24 years: a systematic analysis.

Authors:  Fiona M Gore; Paul J N Bloem; George C Patton; Jane Ferguson; Véronique Joseph; Carolyn Coffey; Susan M Sawyer; Colin D Mathers
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Behavioral and emotional problems among Turkish children at ages 2 to 3 years.

Authors:  Nese Erol; Zeynep Simsek; Ozgur Oner; Kerim Munir
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 8.829

6.  Evaluation of the self-reported SDQ in a clinical setting: do self-reports tell us more than ratings by adult informants?

Authors:  Andreas Becker; Nicola Hagenberg; Veit Roessner; Wolfgang Woerner; Aribert Rothenberger
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.785

7.  The Strengths and Difficulties Self-Report Questionnaire as a screening instrument in Norwegian community samples.

Authors:  John A Rønning; Bjørn Helge Handegaard; Andre Sourander; Willy-Tore Mørch
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.785

8.  Mental health of children and adolescents in Great Britain.

Authors:  H Meltzer; R Gatward; R Goodman; T Ford
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2003 Feb-May

9.  Construct validity of the five-factor Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in pre-, early, and late adolescence.

Authors:  Betty Van Roy; Marijke Veenstra; Jocelyne Clench-Aas
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 8.982

10.  Strengths and difficulties as correlates of attachment style in institutionalized and non-institutionalized children with below-average intellectual abilities.

Authors:  Peter Muris; Anneke Maas
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2004
View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Review of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire translated into languages spoken by children and adolescents of refugee background.

Authors:  Yvonne Stolk; Ida Kaplan; Josef Szwarc
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 4.035

2.  Universal screening in middle and high schools: Who falls through the cracks?

Authors:  Samantha M Margherio; Steven W Evans; Julie Sarno Owens
Journal:  Sch Psychol       Date:  2019-11

3.  Measuring adolescent mental health around the globe: psychometric properties of the self-report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in South Africa, and comparison with UK, Australian and Chinese data.

Authors:  P J de Vries; E L Davids; C Mathews; L E Aarø
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 6.892

4.  Should Clinicians Split or Lump Psychiatric Symptoms? The Structure of Psychopathology in Two Large Pediatric Clinical Samples from England and Norway.

Authors:  Lorena Fernández de la Cruz; Pablo Vidal-Ribas; Nada Zahreddine; Børge Mathiassen; Per Håkan Brøndbo; Emily Simonoff; Robert Goodman; Argyris Stringaris
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2018-08

5.  Analysis of Predictive Factors on Minors' Mental Health According to the Spanish National Health Survey.

Authors:  Fernando Fajardo-Bullón; Irina Rasskin-Gutman; Elena Felipe-Castaño; Eduardo João Ribeiro Dos Santos; Benito León-Del Barco
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2017-10-21

6.  Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: internal validity and reliability for New Zealand preschoolers.

Authors:  Paula Kersten; Alain C Vandal; Hinemoa Elder; Kathryn M McPherson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Assessing the factor structure of the Spanish language parent Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in Honduras.

Authors:  Melissa L Harry; José Acevedo; Thomas M Crea
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Strengths Against Psychopathology in Adolescents: Ratifying the Robust Buffer Role of Trait Emotional Intelligence.

Authors:  José A Piqueras; Maria do Céu Salvador; Victoria Soto-Sanz; Francisco Mira; Juan-Carlos Pérez-González
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Social Emotional Health Survey-Secondary (SEHS-S): A Universal Screening Measure of Social-Emotional Strengths for Spanish-Speaking Adolescents.

Authors:  Jose A Piqueras; Tiscar Rodriguez-Jimenez; Juan Carlos Marzo; Maria Rivera-Riquelme; Agustin E Martinez-Gonzalez; Raquel Falco; Michael J Furlong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): Factor Structure and Gender Equivalence in Norwegian Adolescents.

Authors:  Tormod Bøe; Mari Hysing; Jens Christoffer Skogen; Kyrre Breivik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.