| Literature DB >> 26036862 |
Javier Ortuño-Sierra1, Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero2, Rebeca Aritio-Solana2, Alvaro Moreno Velasco2, Edurne Chocarro de Luis2, Gunter Schumann3,4, Anna Cattrell3,4, Herta Flor5, Frauke Nees5, Tobias Banaschewski6, Arun Bokde7, Rob Whelan7, Christian Buechel8, Uli Bromberg8, Patricia Conrod3,9, Vincent Frouin10, Dimitri Papadopoulos10, Juergen Gallinat11, Hugh Garavan12, Andreas Heinz11, Henrik Walter11, Maren Struve13,14, Penny Gowland15, Tomáš Paus16, Luise Poustka6, Jean-Luc Martinot17, Marie-Laure Paillère-Martinot17, Nora C Vetter18, Michael N Smolka19, Claire Lawrence19.
Abstract
The main purpose of the present study was to analyse the internal structure and to test the measurement invariance of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), self-reported version, in five European countries. The sample consisted of 3012 adolescents aged between 12 and 17 years (M = 14.20; SD = 0.83). The five-factor model (with correlated errors added), and the five-factor model (with correlated errors added) with the reverse-worded items allowed to cross-load on the Prosocial subscale, displayed adequate goodness of-fit indices. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis showed that the five-factor model (with correlated errors added) had partial strong measurement invariance by countries. A total of 11 of the 25 items were non-invariant across samples. The level of internal consistency of the Total difficulties score was 0.84, ranging between 0.69 and 0.78 for the SDQ subscales. The findings indicate that the SDQ's subscales need to be modified in various ways for screening emotional and behavioural problems in the five European countries that were analysed.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescents; Behavioural problems; Factorial structure; Measurement invariance; SDQ; Self-report
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26036862 DOI: 10.1007/s00787-015-0729-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry ISSN: 1018-8827 Impact factor: 4.785