| Literature DB >> 26036270 |
Michael N Okal1,2, Manuela Herrera-Varela3,4, Paul Ouma5, Baldwyn Torto6, Steven W Lindsay7, Jenny M Lindh8, Ulrike Fillinger9,10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cues that guide gravid Anopheles gambiae sensu lato to oviposition sites can be manipulated to create new strategies for monitoring and controlling malaria vectors. However, progress towards identifying such cues is slow in part due to the lack of appropriate tools for investigating long-range attraction to putative oviposition substrates. This study aimed to develop a relatively easy-to-use bioassay system that can effectively analyse chemical attraction of gravid Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26036270 PMCID: PMC4456765 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-015-0916-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Semi-field system (a) and schematic diagram of trap positions and release sites (b) Trap positions are shown in circles and mosquito release points in triangles. Colour codes show corresponding trap positions and mosquito release points
Fig. 2Modification and set-up of BG-Sentinel trap. (a) Interior showing bucket for holding aqueous solutions, (b) Complete trap (c) Cross-section of modified Biogents (BG)-Sentinel gravid mosquito trap
Fig. 3Explanatory data analyses of oviposition response of Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto to test substrates. Box-and-whisker plots indicating the median value by the central horizontal line and the lower and upper quartiles by corresponding ends of the box. The whiskers show the range of the data. Dots show outlying values. a. Proportion of females responding to the test substrate (INF = soil infusion, INFsalt = soil infusion with NaCl) compared to distilled water or infusion controls (DW = distilled water, DWsalt = distilled water with NaCl) in choice tests; b. Response rate of the females released (N = 200); c. Response of mosquitoes before 21:30 h out of the females trapped per night. The red line indicates 0.5 distribution
Oviposition response of gravid Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto to substrates in two-choice tests. Generalized linear model outputs
| Oviposition substrates | Mean proportion | Odds ratio |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control (trap A) | Test (trap B) | (95 % CI) | (95 % CI) | |
| Proportion of gravid females trapped in test (trap B) in two choice experiments of the females trapped | ||||
| Distilled water | Distilled water | 0.50 (0.43–0.57) | 1 | |
| Distilled water | Infusion | 0.64 (0.58–0.70) | 1.8 (1.3–2.6) | 0.004 |
| Distilled water + NaCl | Infusion + NaCl | 0.77 (0.72–0.81) | 3.4 (2.4–4.8) | <0.001 |
| Infusion | Infusion + NaCl | 0.67 (0.60–0.69) | 1.8 (1.3–2.5) | 0.001 |
| Response rate of released gravid females during experiments with different substrate combinations | ||||
| Distilled-Distilled | 0.45 (0.33–0.57) | 1 | ||
| Distilled-Infusion | 0.51 (0.39–0.63) | 1.3 (0.6–2.5) | 0.438 | |
| Distilled + NaCl – Infusion + NaCl | 0.74 (0.63–0.84) | 3.7 (1.8–7.5) | <0.001 | |
| Infusion - Infusion + NaCl | 0.84 (0.73–0.91) | 6.8 (3.1–15.0) | <0.001 | |
| Response of gravid females before 21:30 h of the females trapped during the night (early responders) | ||||
| Distilled-Distilled | 0.36 (0.28–0.45) | 1 | ||
| Distilled-Infusion | 0.56 (0.46–0.67) | 1.59 (1.11–2.29) | 0.003 | |
| Distilled + NaCl – Infusion + NaCl | 0.66 (0.58–0.74) | 1.92 (1.38–2.68) | <0.001 | |
| Infusion - Infusion + NaCl | 0.64 (0.54–0.73) | 1.76 (1.29–2.44) | 0.001 | |