Literature DB >> 26036193

Comparison of two protocols of periosteal distraction osteogenesis in a rabbit calvaria model.

Nikola Saulacic1,2, Ken Nakahara2, Tateyuki Iizuka2, Maiko Haga-Tsujimura2, Willy Hofstetter3, Paolo Scolozzi4.   

Abstract

The regenerative pathways during periosteal distraction osteogenesis may be influenced by the local environment composed by cells, growth factors, nutrition and mechanical load. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of two protocols of periosteal distraction on bone formation. Custom made distraction devices were surgically fixed onto the calvariae of 60 rabbits. After an initial healing period of 7 days, two groups of animals were submitted to distraction rates of 0.25 and 0.5 mm/24 h for 10 days, respectively. Six animals per group were sacrificed 10 (mid-distraction), 17 (end-distraction), 24 (1-week consolidation), 31 (2-week consolidation) and 77 days (2-month consolidation) after surgery. Newly formed bone was assessed by means of micro-CT and histologically. Expression of transcripts encoding tissue-specific genes (BMP-2, RUNX2, ACP5, SPARC, collagen I α1, collagen II α1 and SOX9) was analyzed by quantitative PCR. Two patterns of bone formation were observed, originating from the old bone surface in Group I and from the periosteum in Group II. Bone volume (BV) and bone mineral density (BMD) significantly increased up to the 2-month consolidation period within the groups (p < 0.05). Significantly more bone was observed in Group II compared to Group I at the 2-month consolidation period (p < 0.001). Expression of transcripts encoding osteogenic genes in bone depended on the time-point of observation (p < 0.05). Low level of transcripts reveals an indirect role of periosteum in the osteogenic process. Two protocols of periosteal distraction in the present model resulted in moderate differences in terms of bone formation.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 104B: 1121-1131, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal model; bone; distraction osteogenesis; gene expression; histology; micro-CT; periosteum

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26036193     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  6 in total

Review 1.  Systematic Review and Quality Evaluation Using ARRIVE 2.0 Guidelines on Animal Models Used for Periosteal Distraction Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Mario García-González; Fernando Muñoz; Antonio González-Cantalapiedra; Mónica López-Peña; Nikola Saulacic
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 2.  Periosteal Distraction Osteogenesis: An Effective Method for Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Danyang Zhao; Yu Wang; Dong Han
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Three-Dimensional-Printed Poly-L-Lactic Acid Scaffolds with Different Pore Sizes Influence Periosteal Distraction Osteogenesis of a Rabbit Skull.

Authors:  Danyang Zhao; Wenbo Jiang; Yu Wang; Chuandong Wang; Xiaoling Zhang; Qingfeng Li; Dong Han
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Induced osteogenesis using biodegradable and titanium periosteal distractors.

Authors:  Marwa Madi
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2020-12-31

5.  A collagen membrane for periosteal expansion osteogenesis using a timed-release system in rabbit calvaria.

Authors:  Kensuke Yamauchi; Kazuhiro Imoto; Kenji Odajima; Hiromitsu Morishima; Yoshinaka Shimizu; Shinnosuke Nogami; Tetsu Takahashi
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-03-04

Review 6.  Comprehensive In Vitro Testing of Calcium Phosphate-Based Bioceramics with Orthopedic and Dentistry Applications.

Authors:  Radu Albulescu; Adrian-Claudiu Popa; Ana-Maria Enciu; Lucian Albulescu; Maria Dudau; Ionela Daniela Popescu; Simona Mihai; Elena Codrici; Sevinci Pop; Andreea-Roxana Lupu; George E Stan; Gina Manda; Cristiana Tanase
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-10       Impact factor: 3.623

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.