Literature DB >> 26035683

Dietary Supplements: Knowledge and Adverse Event Reporting Among American Medical Society for Sports Medicine Physicians.

Blaise Pascale1, Clay Steele, Selasi Attipoe, Francis G OʼConnor, Patricia A Deuster.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Certain dietary supplements (DSs) used by military populations pose a threat to overall readiness. This study assessed members of the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM) regarding their knowledge of DS use among their patients and reporting of suspected adverse events.
DESIGN: A thirteen-question retrospective, cross-sectional, Web-based survey sought data on practices regarding DSs and adverse event reporting.
SETTING: Anonymous Web-based survey. PARTICIPANTS: Military and civilian sports medicine physicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary finding of the study was how frequently practitioners report adverse events associated with DS use.
RESULTS: A total of 311 physicians responded to the survey. Only 51% of respondents had a reliable source for information on DS safety and 58% routinely discussed DS use with their patients. Although a majority (71%) of respondents had encountered adverse events associated with DS use, few of those (10%) confirmed reporting such events. Reasons that physicians did not report adverse events were lack of knowledge regarding where to report (68%), how to report (61%), and availability of time (9%).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that some AMSSM physicians are familiar with DSs and have encountered adverse events associated with their use. However, reporting of these adverse events to the appropriate agency is minimal at best. The significant gaps in physician knowledge regarding how and where to report such events indicate a need to educate physicians on this subject. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings of this survey indicate the need for provider education on reporting adverse events associated with DS use. Although reporting of adverse events is essential for removing harmful DSs from the market, a majority of physicians have limited knowledge on this issue. Moreover, the survey provides insight into the barriers to physician reporting of adverse events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26035683     DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Sport Med        ISSN: 1050-642X            Impact factor:   3.638


  5 in total

Review 1.  United States Pharmacopeia (USP) comprehensive review of the hepatotoxicity of green tea extracts.

Authors:  Hellen A Oketch-Rabah; Amy L Roe; Cynthia V Rider; Herbert L Bonkovsky; Gabriel I Giancaspro; Victor Navarro; Mary F Paine; Joseph M Betz; Robin J Marles; Steven Casper; Bill Gurley; Scott A Jordan; Kan He; Mahendra P Kapoor; Theertham P Rao; Averell H Sherker; Robert J Fontana; Simona Rossi; Raj Vuppalanchi; Leonard B Seeff; Andrew Stolz; Jawad Ahmad; Christopher Koh; Jose Serrano; Tieraona Low Dog; Richard Ko
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2020-02-15

Review 2.  Anabolic androgenic steroid-induced liver injury: An update.

Authors:  Ana Petrovic; Sonja Vukadin; Renata Sikora; Kristina Bojanic; Robert Smolic; Davor Plavec; George Y Wu; Martina Smolic
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 5.374

Review 3.  Prohibited Contaminants in Dietary Supplements.

Authors:  Neilson M Mathews
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 3.843

4.  Reporting of adverse events related to dietary supplements to a public health center by medical staff: a survey of clinics and pharmacies.

Authors:  Kazuki Ide; Hiroshi Yamada; Yohei Kawasaki; Marika Noguchi; Mamoru Kitagawa; Tsuyoshi Chiba; Yoshiyuki Kagawa; Keizo Umegaki
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 2.423

5.  Musculoskeletal practices for the preparticipation physical examination.

Authors:  Connor Corrente; Matthew Silvis; Joseph Murphy; Robert Gallo; Cayce Onks
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-08-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.