Literature DB >> 26035404

Locating and Outlining the Cortical Motor Representation Areas of Facial Muscles With Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Laura Säisänen1, Petro Julkunen, Samuli Kemppainen, Nils Danner, Arto Immonen, Esa Mervaala, Sara Määttä, Anu Muraja-Murro, Mervi Könönen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) has become established as an accurate noninvasive technique for mapping the functional motor cortex for the representation areas of upper and lower limb muscles but not yet for facial musculature.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the applicability and clinical impact of using nTMS to map cortical motor areas of facial muscles in healthy volunteers and neurosurgical tumor patients.
METHODS: Eight healthy volunteers and 12 patients with tumor were studied. The motor threshold (MT) was determined for the abductor pollicis brevis and mentalis muscles. The lateral part of the motor cortex was mapped with suprathreshold stimulation intensity, and motor evoked potentials were recorded from several facial muscles. The patient protocol was modified according to the clinical indication.
RESULTS: In all healthy subjects, motor evoked potentials were elicited in the mentalis (mean latency, 13.4 milliseconds) and orbicularis oris (mean latency, 12.6 milliseconds) muscles. At 110% of MT of the mentalis, the motor evoked potentials of facial muscles were elicited mainly in the precentral gyrus but also from one gyrus anterior and posterior to it. The cortical areas applicable for mapping were limited by an artifact attributable to direct peripheral nerve stimulation. The mapping protocol was successful in 10 of 12 tumor patients at locating the representation area of the lower facial muscles. The MT of the facial muscles was significantly higher than that of the abductor pollicis brevis.
CONCLUSION: nTMS is an applicable and clinically beneficial noninvasive method to preoperatively map the cortical representation areas of the facial muscles in the lower part of the face. Instead of using the MT of the abductor pollicis brevis, the stimulus intensity during mapping should be proportioned to the MT of a facial muscle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26035404     DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  4 in total

1.  Mentalis muscle related reflexes.

Authors:  Ayşegül Gündüz; Özlem Uyanık; Özdem Ertürk; Melis Sohtaoğlu; Meral Erdemir Kızıltan
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Motor cortex representation of deep and superficial neck flexor muscles in individuals with and without neck pain.

Authors:  Edith Elgueta-Cancino; Welber Marinovic; Gwendolen Jull; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Cortical representation of auricular muscles in humans: A robot-controlled TMS mapping and fMRI study.

Authors:  Jonna Meincke; Manuel Hewitt; Markus Reischl; Rüdiger Rupp; Carsten Schmidt-Samoa; David Liebetanz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Comparing navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping and "gold standard" direct cortical stimulation mapping in neurosurgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hanne-Rinck Jeltema; Ann-Katrin Ohlerth; Aranka de Wit; Michiel Wagemakers; Adrià Rofes; Roelien Bastiaanse; Gea Drost
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-10-03       Impact factor: 3.042

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.