| Literature DB >> 26035181 |
Qing Deng1, Bo Hu1, Sheng Cao1, Hong-Ning Song1, Jin-Ling Chen1, Qing Zhou1.
Abstract
This study aimed to verify the feasibility and efficacy of ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction (UTMD)-mediated angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1) gene delivery into the infarcted myocardium. Microbubbles carrying anti-intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) antibody were prepared and identified. The microbubbles carrying anti-ICAM-1 antibody selectively adhered to the interleukin (IL)-1β-stimulated ECV304 cells and to the ischemic vascular endothelium, and the infarct area was examined to evaluate the targeting ability of ICAM-1 microbubbles in vitro and in vivo. The intravenous administration of the Ang-1 gene was carried out by UTMD in rabbits with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The rabbits were divided into the control (no treatment), non-targeted microbubble destruction (non-TMB) and the ICAM-1 TMB (TMB) group. Gene delivery by direct intramyocardial injection (IMI) served as a reference. Two weeks later, regional myocardial perfusion and cardiac function were evaluated by echocardiography, and Ang-1 gene-mediated angiogenesis was assessed histologically and biochemically. The results revealed that the ICAM-1-targeted microbubbles selectively adhered to the IL-1β-stimulated ECV304 cells in vitro and to the ischemic vascular endothelium in the infarct area of the rabbits with AMI. Two weeks after the delivery of the Ang-1 gene, compared with the non-TMB group, left ventricular function and myocardial perfusion at the infarct area had improved in the TMB and IMI group (p<0.01). Ang-1 gene expression was detectable in the non-TMB, TMB and IMI group, while its expression was higher in the latter 2 groups (all p<0.01). The microvascular density (MVD) of the infarct area in the non-TMB, TMB and IMI group was 65.6 ± 4.4, 96.7 ± 2.1 and 100.7 ± 3.6, respectively (p<0.01). The findings of our study indicate that UTMD-mediated gene delivery may be used to successfully deliver the Ang-1 gene to the infarcted myocardium, thus improving the efficacy of therapeutic angiogenesis. This may provide a novel strategy for future gene therapy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26035181 PMCID: PMC4501666 DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.2015.2226
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Med ISSN: 1107-3756 Impact factor: 4.101
Figure 1Intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1)-targeted microbubbles as observed under a light microscope and a fluorescence microscope to show the combination of FITC-labeled ICAM-1 antibody and SonoVue microbubbles. (A) Light microscope, x100 magnification. (B) Fluorescence microscope, x100 magnification.
Figure 2Combination of targeted microbubbles with ECV304 cells stimulated or not with interleukin-1β (IL-1β) as observed under a fluorescence microscope (x200 magnification). (A) The fringe of the IL-1β stimulated ECV304 cells showed bright green fluorescence. (B) Slight green fluorescence was observed at the fringe of the normal ECV304 cells not stimulated with IL-1β.
Figure 3The adherence of targeted microbubbles carrying anti-intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) antibody to injured vascular endothelium in vivo (fluorescence microscope, x200 magnification). (A and B) The fluorescence microscope images of the frozen section of cardiac muscle following injection of the targeted microbubbles into the rabbits with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) rabbit and in the normal rabbits, respectively. Only slight green fluorescence was observed in the normal myocardial vascular endothelium in the control group, which indicated that few ICAM-1-targeted microbubbles were released and had adhered at the normal vascular endothelium. (C) No green fluorescence was observed in the blank control group. (D) Frozen section of hepatic tissue from rabbits with AMI.
Evaluation of echocardiography before and after gene transfection (mean ± SD).
| Group | Control | Non-TMB | TMB | IMI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | 6 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| LVEF (baseline) | 0.50±0.05 | 0.51±0.04 | 0.52±0.05 | 0.50±0.02 |
| LVEF (post) | 0.51±0.04 | 0.67±0.05 | 0.72±0.03 | 0.72±0.05 |
| ΔEF | 0.01±0.01 | 0.16±0.05 | 0.20±0.05 | 0.22±0.05 |
| LVEDD (baseline) (mm) | 1.76±0.17 | 1.57±0.18 | 1.61±0.18 | 1.59±0.16 |
| LVEDD (post) (mm) | 1.73±0.19 | 1.39±0.16 | 1.34±0.20 | 1.28±0.19 |
| Δdimension (mm) | 0.03±0.03 | 0.18±0.10 | 0.26±0.06 | 0.31±0.71 |
| LVAW (baseline) (mm) | 1.82±0.15 | 1.91±0.16 | 1.96±0.20 | 2.09±0.24 |
| LVAW (post) (mm) | 1.82±0.08 | 2.09±0.12 | 2.40±0.16 | 2.43±0.20 |
| ΔLVAW (mm) | 0.00±0.09 | 0.18±0.07 | 0.44±0.16 | 0.34±0.09 |
| p-value for LVEF | 0.199 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| p-value for LVEDD | 0.12 | 0.02 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| p-value for LVAW | 1.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Non-TMB, non-targeted microbubbles group; TMB, ICAM-1-targeted microbubbles group; IMI, intramyocardial injection group; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension; LVAW, left ventricular anterior wall; LVEF, LVEDD, LVAW (baseline), LVEF, LVEDD, LVAW 2 days after AMI; LVEF, LVEDD, LVAW (post), LVEF, LVEDD, LVAW 2 weeks after gene transfection; ΔEF, (LVEF 2 weeks after gene transfection) - (LVEF 2 days after AMI); Δdimension, (LVEDD 2 weeks after gene transfection) - (LVEDD 2 days after AMI); ΔLVAW, (LVAW 2 weeks after gene transfection) - (LVAW 2 days after AMI).
P<0.01 compared with the control group;
P<0.01, compared with non-TMB group. p-value for LVEF, LVEDD, LVAW, the comparison of LVEF, LVEDD, LVAW between baseline and post.
Figure 4Myocardial perfusion of the infarct area in the control and gene-transfected animals. (A) Arrows indicate the contrast agent detection in the anterior wall 2 weeks after the induction of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the control rabbits. (B) Non-targeted microbubble delivery (TMB), (C) TMB and (D) intramyocardial injection (IMI) group rabbits; arrows indicate (B) slight filling or (C and D) partial filling of the contrast agent in the infarct area 2 weeks after gene transfection.
Figure 5The contrast agent signal intensity ratio of the anterior wall to the posterior wall in the control and gene-transfected animals. p<0.01 indicates that the contrast agent signal intensity ratio of the anterior wall to the posterior wall in the targeted microbubble delivery (TMB) and intramyocardial injection (IMI) group was higher than that of the non-TMB group; no differences were observed between the TMB and IMI group.
Figure 6RT-PCR of angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1) mRNA expression in each group. No expression was observed in the control group, while gene expression was detected in the other 3 groups. Lanes 1-4, β-actin; lane 5, control; lane 6, non-targeted microbubble delivery (TMB) group; lane 7, TMB group; lane 8, intramyocardial injection (IMI) group.
Figure 7RT-PCR of angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1) mRNA expression in each group. No significant difference in gene expression was observed between the targeted microbubble delivery (TMB) and intramyocardial injection (IMI) group, while the expression in both these groups was significantly higher than that of the non-TMB group.
Figure 8Western blot analysis of angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1) protein expression in each group. No significant levels of protein expression were detected in the control group. non-TMB, non-targeted microbubble delivery; TMB, targeted microbubble delivery; IMI, intramyocardial injection.
Figure 9Western blot analysis of angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1) protein expression in each group. No significant difference in the protein level was observed between the targeted microbubble delivery (TMB) and intramyocardial injection (IMI) group, while the level in both these groups was significantly higher than that of the non-TMB group.
Figure 10The microvessel density in the infarct area 2 weeks after gene transfection detected by immunohistochemistry. Only a small quantity of capillaries was observed in the controls; some capillaries were observed in the non-targeted microbubble delivery (TMB) group, and more capillaries in the TMB and intramyocardial injection (IMI) group.
Figure 11The number of capillaries in each group as detected by immunohistochemistry. The numbers of capillaries in the intramyocardial injection (IMI) group was higher than that in the other 3 groups (p<0.01, p<0.01 and p=0.028), the microvessel density in the targeted microbubble delivery (TMB) group was higher than that in the non-TMB group.