Literature DB >> 26034719

Anorectal malformations (part 2).

Sushmita Bhatnagar1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26034719      PMCID: PMC4447478     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neonatal Surg        ISSN: 2226-0439


× No keyword cloud information.
(This section is meant for residents to check their understanding regarding a particular topic)

Questions

Q.1. What are the pre-operative workup/investigations necessary for a baby born with ARM? Q. 2. Briefly describe the aims and details of surgical management of anorectal malformations.

Answers

Answer 1 As discussed in the first part, anorectal malformations represent a wide spectrum of anomalies involving more than one system. Also, the pre-operative work up differs in boys and girls (Tables 1 and 2). The pre-operative work up could be discussed under the following headings: a) For diagnosis of type of anorectal anomaly b) For associated anomalies c) For spinal abnormalities d) For perineal musculature Table 1: Investigations for boys with anorectal anomalies. Figure 1: Positioning of the baby for Cross Table Prone Lateral X-Ray. Figure 2: Interpretation of Invert gram or CTPL X-ray. Table 2: Investigations for Anorectal malformations in girls Some of the associated anomalies significantly impact the overall outcome in patients with anorectal malformations, so they must be evaluated at birth (Table 3). Table 3: Investigations for associated anomalies Preoperative MRI of the pelvis and perineum is indicated for perineal musculature and the delineation of the sphincter complex in selected cases. MRI is helpful in thorough evaluation of the following (2): a. Quality and shape of muscles responsible for fecal continence. b. Location of bowel and its relation to the muscle complex. c. Level of fistula and posterior urethral diverticulum. d. Sacral spinal anomalies, if any. e. Associated genitourinary anomalies. Apart from pre-operative evaluation, MRI also assists in prognostication of the long-term outcome and the quality of life of the child with anorectal malformation. Answer 2 The most important aim of the surgical correction is to create a normal anus with anatomic reconstruction. Surgery should help the child to achieve a socially acceptable bowel function and should ensure avoiding fecal incontinence, urinary incontinence or sexual dysfunction. The choices of surgical correction are as follows: a. Primary repair – both boys and girls (3-6) b. Staged repair – usually 3 stages: i. Colostomy – most probably high sigmoid loop in left iliac fossa. ii. Pull through – Posterior sagittal approach, abdomino-perineal approach, abdominal posterior sagittal approach, laparoscopic approach – in boys; anterior sagittal approach, anal transposition, posterior sagittal, abdomino-perineal, abdominal posterior sagittal approach – in girls. iii. Colostomy closure. The various surgical techniques that have been used for the management of anorectal malformations have been tabulated below: Table 4: Evolution of surgical treatment of Anorectal Malformations To summarize, the management of anorectal malformations, which differs in boys and girls, algorithms are presented for each respectively (Fig. 3 and 4) Figure 3: Algorithm for management of Male ARM at birth. Figure 4: Algorithm for management of female Anorectal malformations at birth.

Footnotes

Source of Support: Nil Conflict of Interest: The author is editor of the journal. The manuscript is independently handled by other editors and she is not involved in decision making about the manuscript.
  11 in total

1.  Congenital imperforated rectum, recto-urethral and recto-vaginal fistulae.

Authors:  F D STEPHENS
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1953-02

2.  Laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through for high imperforate anus--a new technique.

Authors:  K E Georgeson; T H Inge; C T Albanese
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.545

3.  Results of surgical correction of anorectal malformations. A 10-30 year follow-up.

Authors:  N Iwai; J Yanagihara; K Tokiwa; E Deguchi; T Takahashi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Prone cross-table lateral view: an alternative to the invertogram in imperforate anus.

Authors:  K L Narasimharao; G R Prasad; S Katariya; K Yadav; S K Mitra; I C Pathak
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: important technical considerations and new applications.

Authors:  A Peña; P A Devries
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.545

6.  Single stage repair of anovestibular fistula in neonate.

Authors:  Vijay D Upadhyaya; S C Gopal; D K Gupta; A N Gangopadhyaya; S P Sharma; Vijayendra Kumar
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 1.827

7.  Pre-operative MRI of anorectal anomalies in the newborn period.

Authors:  K McHugh; N E Dudley; P Tam
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1995-11

8.  Primary anorectoplasty in females with common anorectal malformations without colostomy.

Authors:  Prema Menon; Katragadda Lakshmi Narashima Rao
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.545

9.  Advantages of performing the sagittal anoplasty operation for imperforate anus at birth.

Authors:  T C Moore
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 2.545

10.  Surgical treatment of high imperforate anus with definition of the puborectalis sling by an anterior perineal approach.

Authors:  P Mollard; J M Marechal; M J de Beaujeu
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 2.545

View more
  2 in total

1.  Missing anus: Do not miss it.

Authors:  Subhash Chandra Shaw; Karunesh Chand; Sushant Ranjan; Rakesh Gupta
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2018-02-14

2.  Teaching Anorectal Malformations.

Authors:  G Raghavendra Prasad
Journal:  J Neonatal Surg       Date:  2015-07-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.