BACKGROUND: Nearly all patients with malignant glioma will have disease recurrence. Our purpose was to define the treatment toxicity and efficacy of concurrent bevazicumab (BVZ) with hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of relatively larger targets for patients with recurrent MG. METHODS: A retrospective review of 21 patients with recurrent malignant glioma (18 glioblastoma, 3 WHO grade III glioma), treated at initial diagnosis with surgery and standard chemoradiation, was performed. All patients had concurrent BVZ with hypofractionatedSRS, 30 Gy in 5 fractions, with or without concurrent chemotherapy (temozolomide or CCNU). RESULTS: Median patient age was 54 years, median Karnofsky Performance Status was 80, and median target size was 4.3 cm (range, 3.4-7.5 cm). Eleven patients (52%) had previously failed BVZ. One patient had grade 3 toxicities (seizures, dysphasia), which resolved with inpatient admission and intravenous steroids/antiepileptics. Treatment-related toxicities were grade 3 (n = 1), grade 2 (n = 9), and grade 0-1 (n = 11). Kaplan-Meier median progression-free survival and overall survival estimates (calculated from start of SRS) for GBM patients (n = 18) were 11.0 and 12.5 months, respectively. Concurrent chemotherapy did not appear to show any statistically significant efficacy benefit or have any propensity for toxicity. CONCLUSION: BVZ concurrent with hypofractionated SRS was well tolerated by this cohort of patients with relatively larger targets. Ongoing randomized trials with more moderate radiotherapy dosing may help establish the efficacy of this regimen, though intricacies of this approach, including patient selection, radiation target volume delineation/size, and optimal radiation dose, will need further evaluation.
BACKGROUND: Nearly all patients with malignant glioma will have disease recurrence. Our purpose was to define the treatment toxicity and efficacy of concurrent bevazicumab (BVZ) with hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of relatively larger targets for patients with recurrent MG. METHODS: A retrospective review of 21 patients with recurrent malignant glioma (18 glioblastoma, 3 WHO grade III glioma), treated at initial diagnosis with surgery and standard chemoradiation, was performed. All patients had concurrent BVZ with hypofractionatedSRS, 30 Gy in 5 fractions, with or without concurrent chemotherapy (temozolomide or CCNU). RESULTS: Median patient age was 54 years, median Karnofsky Performance Status was 80, and median target size was 4.3 cm (range, 3.4-7.5 cm). Eleven patients (52%) had previously failed BVZ. One patient had grade 3 toxicities (seizures, dysphasia), which resolved with inpatient admission and intravenous steroids/antiepileptics. Treatment-related toxicities were grade 3 (n = 1), grade 2 (n = 9), and grade 0-1 (n = 11). Kaplan-Meier median progression-free survival and overall survival estimates (calculated from start of SRS) for GBMpatients (n = 18) were 11.0 and 12.5 months, respectively. Concurrent chemotherapy did not appear to show any statistically significant efficacy benefit or have any propensity for toxicity. CONCLUSION:BVZ concurrent with hypofractionated SRS was well tolerated by this cohort of patients with relatively larger targets. Ongoing randomized trials with more moderate radiotherapy dosing may help establish the efficacy of this regimen, though intricacies of this approach, including patient selection, radiation target volume delineation/size, and optimal radiation dose, will need further evaluation.
Authors: Patrick Y Wen; David R Macdonald; David A Reardon; Timothy F Cloughesy; A Gregory Sorensen; Evanthia Galanis; John Degroot; Wolfgang Wick; Mark R Gilbert; Andrew B Lassman; Christina Tsien; Tom Mikkelsen; Eric T Wong; Marc C Chamberlain; Roger Stupp; Kathleen R Lamborn; Michael A Vogelbaum; Martin J van den Bent; Susan M Chang Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Shannon E Fogh; David W Andrews; Jon Glass; Walter Curran; Charles Glass; Colin Champ; James J Evans; Terry Hyslop; Edward Pequignot; Beverly Downes; Eileen Comber; Mitchell Maltenfort; Adam P Dicker; Maria Werner-Wasik Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-05-17 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: James J Vredenburgh; Timothy Cloughesy; Meghna Samant; Michael Prados; Patrick Y Wen; Tom Mikkelsen; David Schiff; Lauren E Abrey; W K Alfred Yung; Nina Paleologos; Martin K Nicholas; Randy Jensen; Asha Das; Henry S Friedman Journal: Oncologist Date: 2010-12-08
Authors: Roy G Torcuator; Ravneet Thind; Mehul Patel; Y S Mohan; Joseph Anderson; Thomas Doyle; Samuel Ryu; Rajan Jain; Lonni Schultz; Mark Rosenblum; Tom Mikkelsen Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2009-10-17 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Teri N Kreisl; Lyndon Kim; Kraig Moore; Paul Duic; Cheryl Royce; Irene Stroud; Nancy Garren; Megan Mackey; John A Butman; Kevin Camphausen; John Park; Paul S Albert; Howard A Fine Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-12-29 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Alvin R Cabrera; Kyle C Cuneo; Annick Desjardins; John H Sampson; Frances McSherry; James E Herndon; Katherine B Peters; Karen Allen; Jenny K Hoang; Zheng Chang; Oana Craciunescu; James J Vredenburgh; Henry S Friedman; John P Kirkpatrick Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2013-05-29 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Philip H Gutin; Fabio M Iwamoto; Kathryn Beal; Nimish A Mohile; Sasan Karimi; Bob L Hou; Stella Lymberis; Yoshiya Yamada; Jenghwa Chang; Lauren E Abrey Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-01-23 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Wenyin Shi; Erik S Blomain; Joshua Siglin; Joshua D Palmer; Tu Dan; Yang Wang; Maria Werner-Wasik; Jon Glass; Lyndon Kim; Voichita Bar Ad; Deepak Bhamidipati; James J Evans; Kevin Judy; Christopher J Farrell; David W Andrews Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2017-12-12 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Felix Bokstein; Deborah T Blumenthal; Benjamin W Corn; Eliahu Gez; Diana Matceyevsky; Natan Shtraus; Zvi Ram; Andrew A Kanner Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2015-11-24 Impact factor: 4.130