Literature DB >> 26034294

Reply to Hulme et al.: Cover of non-native species is too low to adversely affect native plant diversity at a national scale.

Chris D Thomas1, G Palmer2.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 26034294      PMCID： PMC4466699          DOI： 10.1073/pnas.1507966112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN： 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Don't judge species on their origins.

Authors:  Mark A Davis; Matthew K Chew; Richard J Hobbs; Ariel E Lugo; John J Ewel; Geerat J Vermeij; James H Brown; Michael L Rosenzweig; Mark R Gardener; Scott P Carroll; Ken Thompson; Steward T A Pickett; Juliet C Stromberg; Peter Del Tredici; Katharine N Suding; Joan G Ehrenfeld; J Philip Grime; Joseph Mascaro; John C Briggs
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Challenging the view that invasive non-native plants are not a significant threat to the floristic diversity of Great Britain.

Authors:  Philip E Hulme; Aníbal Pauchard; Petr Pyšek; Montserrat Vilà; Christina Alba; Tim M Blackburn; James M Bullock; Milan Chytrý; Wayne Dawson; Alison M Dunn; Franz Essl; Piero Genovesi; Lindsay C Maskell; Laura A Meyerson; Martin A Nuñez; Jan Pergl; Oliver L Pescott; Michael J O Pocock; David M Richardson; Helen E Roy; Simon M Smart; Kateřina Štajerová; Thomas Stohlgren; Mark van Kleunen; Marten Winter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Non-native plants add to the British flora without negative consequences for native diversity.

Authors:  Chris D Thomas; G Palmer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 11.205
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.