Ziming Xuan1, Jason G Blanchette2, Toben F Nelson3, Thien H Nguyen1, Scott E Hadland4, Nadia L Oussayef1, Timothy C Heeren5, Timothy S Naimi6. 1. Departments of Community Health Sciences and. 2. Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; 3. Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota; and. 4. Division of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; 6. Departments of Community Health Sciences and Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; tim.naimi@bmc.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The relationship between the alcohol policy environment (ie, the combined effectiveness and implementation of multiple existing alcohol policies) and youth drinking in the United States has not been assessed. We hypothesized that stronger alcohol policy environments are inversely associated with youth drinking, and this relationship is partly explained by adult drinking. METHODS: Alcohol Policy Scale (APS) scores that characterized the strength of the state-level alcohol policy environments were assessed with repeated cross-sectional Youth Risk Behavior Survey data of representative samples of high school students in grades 9 to 12, from biennial years between 1999 and 2011. RESULTS: In fully adjusted models, a 10 percentage point increase in APS scores (representing stronger policy environments) was associated with an 8% reduction in the odds of youth drinking and a 7% reduction in the odds of youth binge drinking. After we accounted for youth-oriented alcohol policies, the subgroup of population-oriented policies was independently associated with lower odds of youth drinking (adjusted odds ratio 0.94; 95% confidence interval 0.92-0.97) and youth binge drinking (adjusted odds ratio 0.96; 95% confidence interval 0.94-0.99). State-level per capita consumption mediated the relationship between population-oriented alcohol policies and binge drinking among youth. CONCLUSIONS: Stronger alcohol policies, including those that do not target youth specifically, are related to a reduced likelihood of youth alcohol consumption. These findings suggest that efforts to reduce youth drinking should incorporate population-based policies to reduce excessive drinking among adults as part of a comprehensive approach to preventing alcohol-related harms. Future research should examine influence of alcohol policy subgroups and discrete policies.
BACKGROUND: The relationship between the alcohol policy environment (ie, the combined effectiveness and implementation of multiple existing alcohol policies) and youth drinking in the United States has not been assessed. We hypothesized that stronger alcohol policy environments are inversely associated with youth drinking, and this relationship is partly explained by adult drinking. METHODS:Alcohol Policy Scale (APS) scores that characterized the strength of the state-level alcohol policy environments were assessed with repeated cross-sectional Youth Risk Behavior Survey data of representative samples of high school students in grades 9 to 12, from biennial years between 1999 and 2011. RESULTS: In fully adjusted models, a 10 percentage point increase in APS scores (representing stronger policy environments) was associated with an 8% reduction in the odds of youth drinking and a 7% reduction in the odds of youth binge drinking. After we accounted for youth-oriented alcohol policies, the subgroup of population-oriented policies was independently associated with lower odds of youth drinking (adjusted odds ratio 0.94; 95% confidence interval 0.92-0.97) and youth binge drinking (adjusted odds ratio 0.96; 95% confidence interval 0.94-0.99). State-level per capita consumption mediated the relationship between population-oriented alcohol policies and binge drinking among youth. CONCLUSIONS: Stronger alcohol policies, including those that do not target youth specifically, are related to a reduced likelihood of youth alcohol consumption. These findings suggest that efforts to reduce youth drinking should incorporate population-based policies to reduce excessive drinking among adults as part of a comprehensive approach to preventing alcohol-related harms. Future research should examine influence of alcohol policy subgroups and discrete policies.
Authors: Carla Alexia Campbell; Robert A Hahn; Randy Elder; Robert Brewer; Sajal Chattopadhyay; Jonathan Fielding; Timothy S Naimi; Traci Toomey; Briana Lawrence; Jennifer Cook Middleton Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Ziming Xuan; Toben F Nelson; Timothy Heeren; Jason Blanchette; David E Nelson; Paul Gruenewald; Timothy S Naimi Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2013-05-24 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: James C Fell; Deborah A Fisher; Robert B Voas; Kenneth Blackman; A Scott Tippetts Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2009-04-09 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Scott E Hadland; Ziming Xuan; Vishnudas Sarda; Jason Blanchette; Monica H Swahn; Timothy C Heeren; Robert B Voas; Timothy S Naimi Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2017-02-13 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Priscilla Martinez; William C Kerr; Meenakshi S Subbaraman; Sarah C M Roberts Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2019-02-11 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Robert A Tessler; Stephen J Mooney; D Alex Quistberg; Ali Rowhani-Rahbar; Monica S Vavilala; Frederick P Rivara Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2019-03-16 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Brian J Fairman; Bruce G Simons-Morton; Denise L Haynie; Danping Liu; Risë B Goldstein; Ralph W Hingson; Stephen E Gilman Journal: Addiction Date: 2019-04-12 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Timothy S Naimi; Ziming Xuan; Vishnudas Sarda; Scott E Hadland; Marlene C Lira; Monica H Swahn; Robert B Voas; Timothy C Heeren Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Thomas K Greenfield; Won K Cook; Katherine J Karriker-Jaffe; Deidre Patterson; William C Kerr; Ziming Xuan; Timothy S Naimi Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Timothy S Naimi; Ziming Xuan; Sharon M Coleman; Marlene C Lira; Scott E Hadland; Susanna E Cooper; Timothy C Heeren; Monica H Swahn Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Ziming Xuan; Timothy S Naimi; Mark S Kaplan; Courtney L Bagge; Lauren R Few; Stephen Maisto; Richard Saitz; Robert Freeman Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2016-09-12 Impact factor: 3.455