Literature DB >> 26034125

Diurnal oscillation of vocal development associated with clustered singing by juvenile songbirds.

Eri Ohgushi1, Chihiro Mori1, Kazuhiro Wada2.   

Abstract

Spaced practice affects learning efficiency in humans and other animals. However, it is not well understood how spaced practice contributes to learning during development. Here, we show the behavioral significance of singing frequency in song development in a songbird, the zebra finch. Songbirds learn a complex song pattern by trial-and-error vocalizations as self-motivated practice, which is executed over a thousand times per day during the sensitive period of vocal learning. Notably, juveniles generate songs with a high frequency of singing in clusters with dense singing, whereas adults sing with low frequency in short clusters. This juvenile-specific clustered singing was characterized by clear separations of daily time for intense practice and rest. During the epochs of vocal practice in juveniles, the song structure approached that of song produced at the end of the day. In contrast, during the epochs of vocal rest, the structure of juvenile songs regressed toward that of songs produced at the beginning of the day, indicating a dynamic progression and regression of song development over the course of the day. When the singing frequency was manipulated to decrease it at the juvenile stage, the oscillation rate of song development was dramatically reduced. Although the juvenile-specific clustered singing occurred in non-tutored socially isolated birds or those with auditory deprivation, the diurnal oscillation of vocal development was only observed in non-tutored isolated juveniles. These results show the impact of 'self-motivated' vocal practice on diurnal song developmental plasticity, modulated by the amount of vocal output and auditory feedback.
© 2015. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Learned vocalization; Self-motivated behavior; Sensorimotor learning; Zebra finch

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26034125     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.115105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  6 in total

1.  Corticobasal ganglia projecting neurons are required for juvenile vocal learning but not for adult vocal plasticity in songbirds.

Authors:  Miguel Sánchez-Valpuesta; Yumeno Suzuki; Yukino Shibata; Noriyuki Toji; Yu Ji; Nasiba Afrin; Chinweike Norman Asogwa; Ippei Kojima; Daisuke Mizuguchi; Satoshi Kojima; Kazuo Okanoya; Haruo Okado; Kenta Kobayashi; Kazuhiro Wada
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Learning in the time of COVID: insights from the zebra finch - a social vocal-learner.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Cooke; Stephanie A White
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 7.070

3.  Unstable neurons underlie a stable learned behavior.

Authors:  William A Liberti; Jeffrey E Markowitz; L Nathan Perkins; Derek C Liberti; Daniel P Leman; Grigori Guitchounts; Tarciso Velho; Darrell N Kotton; Carlos Lois; Timothy J Gardner
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Intrinsic motivation for singing in songbirds is enhanced by temporary singing suppression and regulated by dopamine.

Authors:  Yunbok Kim; Sojeong Kwon; Raghav Rajan; Chihiro Mori; Satoshi Kojima
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Vocal practice regulates singing activity-dependent genes underlying age-independent vocal learning in songbirds.

Authors:  Shin Hayase; Hongdi Wang; Eri Ohgushi; Masahiko Kobayashi; Chihiro Mori; Haruhito Horita; Katsuhiko Mineta; Wan-Chun Liu; Kazuhiro Wada
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 8.029

6.  Singing activity-driven Arc expression associated with vocal acoustic plasticity in juvenile songbird.

Authors:  Shin Hayase; Kazuhiro Wada
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.386

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.