Michael Keall1, Ralph Chapman2, Philippa Howden-Chapman1, Karen Witten3, Wokje Abrahamse4, Alistair Woodward5. 1. Department of Public Health, NZ Centre for Sustainable Cities, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington South, New Zealand. 2. Environmental Studies Programme, NZ Centre for Sustainable Cities, and Victoria University of Wellington, SGEES, Wellington, New Zealand. 3. NZ Centre for Sustainable Cities and Massey University SHORE and Whariki Research Centre, Auckland, New Zealand. 4. NZ Centre for Sustainable Cities, and Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand. 5. NZ Centre for Sustainable Cities, and School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is increased interest in the effectiveness and co-benefits of measures to promote walking and cycling, including health gains from increased physical activity and reductions in fossil fuel use and vehicle emissions. This paper analyses the changes in walking and cycling in two New Zealand cities that accompanied public investment in infrastructure married with programmes to encourage active travel. METHOD: Using a quasi-experimental two-group pre-post study design, we estimated changes in travel behaviour from baseline in 2011 to mid-programme in 2012, and postprogramme in 2013. The intervention and control cities were matched in terms of sociodemographic variables and baseline levels of walking and cycling. A face-to-face survey obtained information on walking and cycling. We also drew from the New Zealand Travel Survey, a national ongoing survey of travel behaviour, which was conducted in the study areas. Estimates from the two surveys were combined using meta-analysis techniques. RESULTS: The trips and physical activity were evaluated. Relative to the control cities, the odds of trips being by active modes (walking or cycling) increased by 37% (95% CI 8% to 73%) in the intervention cities between baseline and postintervention. The net proportion of trips made by active modes increased by about 30%. In terms of physical activity levels, there was little evidence of an overall change. DISCUSSION: Comparing the intervention cities with the matched controls, we found substantial changes in walking and cycling, and conclude that the improvements in infrastructure and associated programmes appear to have successfully arrested the general decline in active mode use evident in recent years. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
BACKGROUND: There is increased interest in the effectiveness and co-benefits of measures to promote walking and cycling, including health gains from increased physical activity and reductions in fossil fuel use and vehicle emissions. This paper analyses the changes in walking and cycling in two New Zealand cities that accompanied public investment in infrastructure married with programmes to encourage active travel. METHOD: Using a quasi-experimental two-group pre-post study design, we estimated changes in travel behaviour from baseline in 2011 to mid-programme in 2012, and postprogramme in 2013. The intervention and control cities were matched in terms of sociodemographic variables and baseline levels of walking and cycling. A face-to-face survey obtained information on walking and cycling. We also drew from the New Zealand Travel Survey, a national ongoing survey of travel behaviour, which was conducted in the study areas. Estimates from the two surveys were combined using meta-analysis techniques. RESULTS: The trips and physical activity were evaluated. Relative to the control cities, the odds of trips being by active modes (walking or cycling) increased by 37% (95% CI 8% to 73%) in the intervention cities between baseline and postintervention. The net proportion of trips made by active modes increased by about 30%. In terms of physical activity levels, there was little evidence of an overall change. DISCUSSION: Comparing the intervention cities with the matched controls, we found substantial changes in walking and cycling, and conclude that the improvements in infrastructure and associated programmes appear to have successfully arrested the general decline in active mode use evident in recent years. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Keywords:
HEALTH BEHAVIOUR; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PUBLIC HEALTH
Authors: Gavin R McCormack; Lindsay McLaren; Grazia Salvo; Anita Blackstaffe Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-05-22 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: A K Macmillan; H Mackie; J E Hosking; K Witten; M Smith; A Field; A Woodward; R Hoskins; J Stewart; B van der Werf; P Baas Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Chris Rissel; Stephen Greaves; Li Ming Wen; Melanie Crane; Chris Standen Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2015-10-06 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Ralph Chapman; Michael Keall; Philippa Howden-Chapman; Mark Grams; Karen Witten; Edward Randal; Alistair Woodward Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-05-11 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Sandra Mandic; Debbie Hopkins; Enrique García Bengoechea; Antoni Moore; Susan Sandretto; Kirsten Coppell; Christina Ergler; Michael Keall; Anna Rolleston; Gavin Kidd; Gordon Wilson; John C Spence Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-03-25 Impact factor: 2.692