Tariq Ahmad1, Emily C O'Brien1, Phillip J Schulte1, Susanna R Stevens1, Mona Fiuzat1, Dalane W Kitzman1, Kirkwood F Adams1, William E Kraus1, Ileana L Piña1, Mark P Donahue1, Faiez Zannad1, David J Whellan1, Christopher M O'Connor1, G Michael Felker2. 1. From the Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (T.A.); Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (E.C.O., P.J.S., S.R.S., M.F., C.M.O., G.M.F.); Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.F., W.E.K., M.P.D., G.M.F.); Department of Cardiology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC (D.W.K.); Department of Cardiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (K.F.A.); Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (I.L.P.); Department of Cardiology, Nancy University, Nancy, France (F.Z.); Department of Cardiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (D.J.W.); and Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, VA (C.M.O.). 2. From the Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (T.A.); Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (E.C.O., P.J.S., S.R.S., M.F., C.M.O., G.M.F.); Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.F., W.E.K., M.P.D., G.M.F.); Department of Cardiology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC (D.W.K.); Department of Cardiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (K.F.A.); Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (I.L.P.); Department of Cardiology, Nancy University, Nancy, France (F.Z.); Department of Cardiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (D.J.W.); and Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, VA (C.M.O.). michael.felker@duke.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Current heart failure (HF) risk prediction models do not consider how individual patient assessments occur in incremental steps; furthermore, each additional diagnostic evaluation may add cost, complexity, and potential morbidity. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a cohort of well-treated ambulatory HF patients with reduced ejection fraction who had complete clinical, laboratory, health-related quality of life, imaging, and exercise testing data, we estimated incremental prognostic information provided by 5 assessment categories, performing an additional analysis on those with available N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels. We compared the incremental value of each additional assessment (quality of life screen, laboratory testing, echocardiography, and exercise testing) to baseline clinical assessment for predicting clinical outcomes (all-cause mortality, all-cause mortality/hospitalization, and cardiovascular death/HF hospitalizations), gauging incremental improvements in prognostic ability with more information using area under the curve and reclassification improvement (net reclassification index), with and without NT-proBNP availability. Of 2331 participants, 1631 patients had complete clinical data; of these, 1023 had baseline NT-proBNP. For prediction of all-cause mortality, models with incremental assessments sans NT-proBNP showed improvements in C-indices (0.72 [clinical model alone]-0.77 [complete model]). Compared with baseline clinical assessment alone, net reclassification index improved from 0.035 (w/laboratory data) to 0.085 (complete model). These improvements were significantly attenuated for models in the subset with measured NT-proBNP data (c-indices: 0.80 [w/laboratory data]-0.81 [full model]); net reclassification index improvements were similarly marginal (0.091→0.096); prediction of other clinical outcomes had similar findings. CONCLUSIONS: In chronic HF patients with reduced ejection fraction, the marginal benefit of complex prognostic evaluations should be weighed against potential patient discomfort and cost escalation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00047437.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Current heart failure (HF) risk prediction models do not consider how individual patient assessments occur in incremental steps; furthermore, each additional diagnostic evaluation may add cost, complexity, and potential morbidity. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a cohort of well-treated ambulatory HF patients with reduced ejection fraction who had complete clinical, laboratory, health-related quality of life, imaging, and exercise testing data, we estimated incremental prognostic information provided by 5 assessment categories, performing an additional analysis on those with available N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels. We compared the incremental value of each additional assessment (quality of life screen, laboratory testing, echocardiography, and exercise testing) to baseline clinical assessment for predicting clinical outcomes (all-cause mortality, all-cause mortality/hospitalization, and cardiovascular death/HF hospitalizations), gauging incremental improvements in prognostic ability with more information using area under the curve and reclassification improvement (net reclassification index), with and without NT-proBNP availability. Of 2331 participants, 1631 patients had complete clinical data; of these, 1023 had baseline NT-proBNP. For prediction of all-cause mortality, models with incremental assessments sans NT-proBNP showed improvements in C-indices (0.72 [clinical model alone]-0.77 [complete model]). Compared with baseline clinical assessment alone, net reclassification index improved from 0.035 (w/laboratory data) to 0.085 (complete model). These improvements were significantly attenuated for models in the subset with measured NT-proBNP data (c-indices: 0.80 [w/laboratory data]-0.81 [full model]); net reclassification index improvements were similarly marginal (0.091→0.096); prediction of other clinical outcomes had similar findings. CONCLUSIONS: In chronic HF patients with reduced ejection fraction, the marginal benefit of complex prognostic evaluations should be weighed against potential patient discomfort and cost escalation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00047437.
Authors: Clyde W Yancy; Mariell Jessup; Biykem Bozkurt; Javed Butler; Donald E Casey; Mark H Drazner; Gregg C Fonarow; Stephen A Geraci; Tamara Horwich; James L Januzzi; Maryl R Johnson; Edward K Kasper; Wayne C Levy; Frederick A Masoudi; Patrick E McBride; John J V McMurray; Judith E Mitchell; Pamela N Peterson; Barbara Riegel; Flora Sam; Lynne W Stevenson; W H Wilson Tang; Emily J Tsai; Bruce L Wilkoff Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-06-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Lawrence J Laslett; Peter Alagona; Bernard A Clark; Joseph P Drozda; Frances Saldivar; Sean R Wilson; Chris Poe; Menolly Hart Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-12-25 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Stuart J Pocock; Cono A Ariti; John J V McMurray; Aldo Maggioni; Lars Køber; Iain B Squire; Karl Swedberg; Joanna Dobson; Katrina K Poppe; Gillian A Whalley; Rob N Doughty Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2012-10-24 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Jeffrey L Anderson; Paul A Heidenreich; Paul G Barnett; Mark A Creager; Gregg C Fonarow; Raymond J Gibbons; Jonathan L Halperin; Mark A Hlatky; Alice K Jacobs; Daniel B Mark; Frederick A Masoudi; Eric D Peterson; Leslee J Shaw Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-03-27 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Sharon Ann Hunt; William T Abraham; Marshall H Chin; Arthur M Feldman; Gary S Francis; Theodore G Ganiats; Mariell Jessup; Marvin A Konstam; Donna M Mancini; Keith Michl; John A Oates; Peter S Rahko; Marc A Silver; Lynne Warner Stevenson; Clyde W Yancy; Elliott M Antman; Sidney C Smith; Cynthia D Adams; Jeffrey L Anderson; David P Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Jonathan L Halperin; Loren F Hiratzka; Alice K Jacobs; Rick Nishimura; Joseph P Ornato; Richard L Page; Barbara Riegel Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-09-13 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: David J Whellan; Christopher M O'Connor; Kerry L Lee; Steven J Keteyian; Lawton S Cooper; Stephen J Ellis; Eric S Leifer; William E Kraus; Dalane W Kitzman; James A Blumenthal; David S Rendall; Nancy Houston-Miller; Jerome L Fleg; Kevin A Schulman; Ileana L Piña Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Soko Setoguchi; Anju Nohria; Jeremy A Rassen; Lynne Warner Stevenson; Sebastian Schneeweiss Journal: CMAJ Date: 2009-03-17 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Christopher M O'Connor; David J Whellan; Kerry L Lee; Steven J Keteyian; Lawton S Cooper; Stephen J Ellis; Eric S Leifer; William E Kraus; Dalane W Kitzman; James A Blumenthal; David S Rendall; Nancy Houston Miller; Jerome L Fleg; Kevin A Schulman; Robert S McKelvie; Faiez Zannad; Ileana L Piña Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-04-08 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: João Pedro Ferreira; Nicolas Girerd; Mattia Arrigo; Pedro Bettencourt Medeiros; Miguel Bento Ricardo; Tiago Almeida; Alexandre Rola; Heli Tolppanen; Said Laribi; Etienne Gayat; Alexandre Mebazaa; Christian Mueller; Faiez Zannad; Patrick Rossignol; Irene Aragão Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 1.889