Literature DB >> 26033892

Neural Mechanisms of Temporal Resolution of Attention.

Christina J Howard1, Naheem Bashir2, Magdalena Chechlacz3, Glyn W Humphreys3.   

Abstract

The dynamic nature of the world requires that our visual representations are continuously updated. These representations are more precise if there is a narrow time window over which information is averaged. We assess the neural processes of visual updating by testing patients with lesions including inferior parietal cortex, control patients and healthy adults on a continuous visual monitoring task. In Experiment 1, observers kept track of the changing spatial period of a luminance grating and identified the final spatial period after the stimulus disappeared. Healthy older adults and neurological controls were able to perform better than simulated guesses, but only 3 of 11 patients with damage including parietal cortex were able to reach performance that differed from simulated guesses. The effects were unrelated to lesion size. Poor performance on this task is consistent with an inability to selectively attend to the final moment at which the stimulus was seen. To investigate the temporal limits of attention, we varied the rate of stimulus change in Experiment 2. Performance remained poor for some patients even with slow 2.5 Hz change rates. The performance of 4 patients with parietal damage displayed poor temporal precision, namely recovery of performance with slower rates of change.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  neuropsychology; rapid serial visual presentation; temporal order judgment task; temporal resolution; visual perception

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26033892      PMCID: PMC4898662          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhv101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  36 in total

1.  Limits of attentive tracking reveal temporal properties of attention.

Authors:  F A Verstraten; P Cavanagh; A T Labianca
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The central role of the temporo-parietal junction and the superior longitudinal fasciculus in supporting multi-item competition: evidence from lesion-symptom mapping of extinction.

Authors:  Magdalena Chechlacz; Pia Rotshtein; Peter C Hansen; Shoumitro Deb; M Jane Riddoch; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Cortical sites of sustained and divided attention in normal elderly humans.

Authors:  P Johannsen; J Jakobsen; P Bruhn; S B Hansen; A Gee; H Stodkilde-Jorgensen; A Gjedde
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Seeing slow and seeing fast: two limits on perception.

Authors:  Alex O Holcombe
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Unilateral right parietal damage leads to bilateral deficit for high-level motion.

Authors:  L Battelli; P Cavanagh; J Intriligator; M J Tramo; M A Hénaff; F Michèl; J J Barton
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-12-20       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Separating forms of neglect using the Apples Test: validation and functional prediction in chronic and acute stroke.

Authors:  Wai Ling Bickerton; Dana Samson; Jonathan Williamson; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Abnormal temporal dynamics of visual attention in spatial neglect patients.

Authors:  M Husain; K Shapiro; J Martin; C Kennard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-01-09       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Temporal order judgments activate temporal parietal junction.

Authors:  Ben Davis; John Christie; Christopher Rorden
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  The 'when' parietal pathway explored by lesion studies.

Authors:  Lorella Battelli; Vincent Walsh; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 6.627

10.  The continuous Wagon wheel illusion and the 'when' pathway of the right parietal lobe: a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Rufin VanRullen; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Lorella Battelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Lesions to right posterior parietal cortex impair visual depth perception from disparity but not motion cues.

Authors:  Aidan P Murphy; David A Leopold; Glyn W Humphreys; Andrew E Welchman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-19       Impact factor: 6.237

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.