Literature DB >> 26033810

Risk and Cause of Death in Patients Diagnosed With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms in Sweden Between 1973 and 2005: A Population-Based Study.

Malin Hultcrantz1, Sally R Wilkes2, Sigurdur Y Kristinsson2, Therese M-L Andersson2, Åsa R Derolf2, Sandra Eloranta2, Jan Samuelsson2, Ola Landgren2, Paul W Dickman2, Paul C Lambert2, Magnus Björkholm2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are associated with a shortened life expectancy. We assessed causes of death in patients with MPN and matched controls using both relative risks and absolute probabilities in the presence of competing risks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From Swedish registries, we identified 9,285 patients with MPN and 35,769 matched controls. A flexible parametric model was used to estimate cause-specific hazard ratios (HRs) of death and cumulative incidence functions, each with 95% CIs.
RESULTS: In patients with MPN, the HRs of death from hematologic malignancies and infections were 92.8 (95% CI, 70.0 to 123.1) and 2.7 (95% CI, 2.4 to 3.1), respectively. In patients age 70 to 79 years at diagnosis (the largest patient group), the HRs of death from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease were 1.5 (95% CI, 1.4 to 1.7) and 1.5 (95% CI, 1.3 to 1.8), respectively; all were statistically significantly elevated compared with those of controls. In the same age group, no difference was observed in the 10-year probability of death resulting from cardiovascular disease in patients with MPN versus controls (16.8% v 15.2%) or cerebrovascular disease (5.6% v 5.2%). In patients age 50 to 59 years at diagnosis, the 10-year probability of death resulting from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease was elevated, 4.2% versus 2.1% and 1.9% versus 0.4%, respectively. Survival in patients with MPN increased over time, mainly because of decreased probabilities of dying as a result of hematologic malignancies, infections, and, in young patients, cardiovascular disease.
CONCLUSION: Patients with MPN had an overall higher mortality rate than that of matched controls, primarily because of hematologic malignancy, infections, and vascular events in younger patients. Evidently, there is still a need for effective disease-modifying agents to improve patient outcomes.
© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26033810     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.6652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  39 in total

Review 1.  The underappreciated risk of thrombosis and bleeding in patients with myelofibrosis: a review.

Authors:  Devendra Kc; Lorenzo Falchi; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 3.673

2.  Elevated plasma levels of procoagulant microparticles are a novel risk factor for thrombosis in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Taniguchi; Hirokazu Tanaka; Espinoza J Luis; Kazuko Sakai; Takahiro Kumode; Keigo Sano; Kentarou Serizawa; Shinya Rai; Yasuyoshi Morita; Hitoshi Hanamoto; Kazuo Tsubaki; Kazuto Nishio; Itaru Matsumura
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 3.  From leeches to personalized medicine: evolving concepts in the management of polycythemia vera.

Authors:  Alessandro M Vannucchi
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 4.  What are the current treatment approaches for patients with polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia?

Authors:  Alessandro M Vannucchi; Paola Guglielmelli
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2017-12-08

Review 5.  Disordered haematopoiesis and athero-thrombosis.

Authors:  Andrew J Murphy; Alan R Tall
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 6.  Diagnosis, risk stratification, and response evaluation in classical myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Elisa Rumi; Mario Cazzola
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Risk factors for infections and secondary malignancies in patients with a myeloproliferative neoplasm treated with ruxolitinib: a dual-center, propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Douglas Tremblay; Amber King; Lihua Li; Erin Moshier; Alexander Coltoff; Anita Koshy; Marina Kremyanskaya; Ronald Hoffman; Michael J Mauro; Raajit K Rampal; John Mascarenhas
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2019-11-12

8.  Pregnancy and myeloproliferative neoplasms : A retrospective monocentric cohort.

Authors:  Mathieu Puyade; Emilie Cayssials; Fabrice Pierre; Olivier Pourrat
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2017-08-04

9.  Low-dose methotrexate in myeloproliferative neoplasm models.

Authors:  Kavitha Chinnaiya; Michelle A Lawson; Sally Thomas; Marie-Therese Haider; Jenny Down; Andrew D Chantry; David Hughes; Antony Green; Jon R Sayers; John A Snowden; Martin P Zeidler
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 10.  Clinical insights into the origins of thrombosis in myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Alison R Moliterno; Yelena Z Ginzburg; Ronald Hoffman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.