Literature DB >> 26033786

ED Triage Decision-Making With Mental Health Presentations: A "Think Aloud" Study.

Diana E Clarke1, Krystal Boyce-Gaudreau2, Ana Sanderson2, John A Baker2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Triage is the process whereby persons presenting to the emergency department are quickly assessed by a nurse and their need for care and service is prioritized. Research examining the care of persons presenting to emergency departments with psychiatric and mental health problems has shown that triage has often been cited as the most problematic aspect of the encounter. Three questions guided this investigation: Where do the decisions that triage nurses make fall on the intuitive versus analytic dimensions of decision making for mental health presentations in the emergency department, and does this differ according to comfort or familiarity with the type of mental health/illness presentation? How do "decision aids" (i.e., structured triage scales) help in the decision-making process? To what extent do other factors, such as attitudes, influence triage nurses' decision making?
METHODS: Eleven triage nurses participating in this study were asked to talk out loud about the reasoning process they would engage in while triaging patients in 5 scenarios based on mental health presentations to the emergency department.
RESULTS: Themes emerging from the data were tweaking the results (including the use of intuition and early judgments) to arrive at the desired triage score; consideration of the current ED environment; managing uncertainty and risk (including the consideration of physical reasons for presentation); and confidence in communicating with patients in distress and managing their own emotive reactions to the scenario. DISCUSSION: Findings support the preference for using the intuitive mode of decision making with only tacit reliance on the decision aid.
Copyright © 2015 Emergency Nurses Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale; Decision making; Emergency department triage; Mental health presentations; Think aloud

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26033786     DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2015.04.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Nurs        ISSN: 0099-1767            Impact factor:   1.836


  3 in total

1.  Unlocking intuition and expertise: using interpretative phenomenological analysis to explore clinical decision making.

Authors:  Natalie Elizabeth Anderson; Julia Slark; Merryn Gott
Journal:  J Res Nurs       Date:  2019-03-05

2.  Reliability analysis of the Manchester Triage System: inter-observer and intra-observer agreement.

Authors:  Cristiane Chaves de Souza; Tânia Couto Machado Chianca; Welfane Cordeiro Júnior; Maria do Carmo Paixão Rausch; Gabriela Fontoura Lana Nascimento
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2018-07-16

3.  The Experience of Emergency Nurses Caring for Patients with Mental Illness: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Hsin-Ju Chou; Kai-Yu Tseng
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.