Hiromi Baba1,2, Jun-ichi Takahara3, Fumiyoshi Yamashita4, Mitsuru Hashida4,5. 1. Kyoto R&D Center, Maruho Co., Ltd., 93 Awata-cho, Chudoji, Shimogyo-ku, 600-8815, Kyoto, Japan. baba_dfq@mii.maruho.co.jp. 2. Department of Drug Delivery Research, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University, 46-29, Yoshida-shimoadachicho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan. baba_dfq@mii.maruho.co.jp. 3. Kyoto R&D Center, Maruho Co., Ltd., 93 Awata-cho, Chudoji, Shimogyo-ku, 600-8815, Kyoto, Japan. 4. Department of Drug Delivery Research, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University, 46-29, Yoshida-shimoadachicho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan. 5. Institute for Integrated Cell-Material Sciences, Kyoto University, 46-29, Yoshida-shimoadachicho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The solvent effect on skin permeability is important for assessing the effectiveness and toxicological risk of new dermatological formulations in pharmaceuticals and cosmetics development. The solvent effect occurs by diverse mechanisms, which could be elucidated by efficient and reliable prediction models. However, such prediction models have been hampered by the small variety of permeants and mixture components archived in databases and by low predictive performance. Here, we propose a solution to both problems. METHODS: We first compiled a novel large database of 412 samples from 261 structurally diverse permeants and 31 solvents reported in the literature. The data were carefully screened to ensure their collection under consistent experimental conditions. To construct a high-performance predictive model, we then applied support vector regression (SVR) and random forest (RF) with greedy stepwise descriptor selection to our database. The models were internally and externally validated. RESULTS: The SVR achieved higher performance statistics than RF. The (externally validated) determination coefficient, root mean square error, and mean absolute error of SVR were 0.899, 0.351, and 0.268, respectively. Moreover, because all descriptors are fully computational, our method can predict as-yet unsynthesized compounds. CONCLUSION: Our high-performance prediction model offers an attractive alternative to permeability experiments for pharmaceutical and cosmetic candidate screening and optimizing skin-permeable topical formulations.
PURPOSE: The solvent effect on skin permeability is important for assessing the effectiveness and toxicological risk of new dermatological formulations in pharmaceuticals and cosmetics development. The solvent effect occurs by diverse mechanisms, which could be elucidated by efficient and reliable prediction models. However, such prediction models have been hampered by the small variety of permeants and mixture components archived in databases and by low predictive performance. Here, we propose a solution to both problems. METHODS: We first compiled a novel large database of 412 samples from 261 structurally diverse permeants and 31 solvents reported in the literature. The data were carefully screened to ensure their collection under consistent experimental conditions. To construct a high-performance predictive model, we then applied support vector regression (SVR) and random forest (RF) with greedy stepwise descriptor selection to our database. The models were internally and externally validated. RESULTS: The SVR achieved higher performance statistics than RF. The (externally validated) determination coefficient, root mean square error, and mean absolute error of SVR were 0.899, 0.351, and 0.268, respectively. Moreover, because all descriptors are fully computational, our method can predict as-yet unsynthesized compounds. CONCLUSION: Our high-performance prediction model offers an attractive alternative to permeability experiments for pharmaceutical and cosmetic candidate screening and optimizing skin-permeable topical formulations.
Entities:
Keywords:
in silico prediction; quantitative structure–property relationship; skin permeability; solvent effect; support vector regression
Authors: Tatiana I Netzeva; Andrew Worth; Tom Aldenberg; Romualdo Benigni; Mark T D Cronin; Paolo Gramatica; Joanna S Jaworska; Scott Kahn; Gilles Klopman; Carol A Marchant; Glenn Myatt; Nina Nikolova-Jeliazkova; Grace Y Patlewicz; Roger Perkins; David Roberts; Terry Schultz; David W Stanton; Johannes J M van de Sandt; Weida Tong; Gilman Veith; Chihae Yang Journal: Altern Lab Anim Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 1.303
Authors: Alan R Katritzky; Dimitar A Dobchev; Dan C Fara; Evrim Hür; Kaido Tämm; Ludovic Kurunczi; Mati Karelson; Alexandre Varnek; Vitaly P Solov'ev Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2006-06-01 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Sean Ekins; Ana C Puhl; Kimberley M Zorn; Thomas R Lane; Daniel P Russo; Jennifer J Klein; Anthony J Hickey; Alex M Clark Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2019-04-18 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: Eun A Kim; Jun Soo Park; Min Seop Kim; Min Young Jeong; Hyun Jin Park; Jun Hyuk Choi; Jae Hee Seo; Yong Seok Choi; Myung Joo Kang Journal: Int J Nanomedicine Date: 2021-11-03