Literature DB >> 2603372

Retrospective evaluation of repeat celiotomy in 53 horses with acute gastrointestinal disease.

J E Parker1, S L Fubini, R J Todhunter.   

Abstract

Fifty-three of 648 horses (8.2%) treated surgically for acute gastrointestinal obstruction were subjected to repeat celiotomy. Forty horses (75%) recovered from anesthesia after repeat celiotomy, and 26 horses (49%) were discharged from the clinic. Excluding two horses lost to follow-up, 10 of 51 horses (20%) survived long term. Horses subjected to repeat celiotomy had a significantly lower long-term survival rate than horses subjected to a single celiotomy. Twenty-eight horses had mechanical obstructions, and 22 had functional obstructions at the second surgery. Significantly more horses with mechanical obstructions recovered from anesthesia, but there was no difference in short-term or long-term survival. Seventy-seven percent of horses were subjected to two celiotomies without being discharged from the clinic between procedures. The intervals between primary and repeat celiotomies ranged from less than 24 hours to 4 years, with 89% of them being less than 2 months. Horses with functional obstructions at the second surgery had a significantly shorter interval between surgeries than horses with mechanical obstructions. Twenty-three horses had sequelae of the primary celiotomy, 19 had progression of their original disease, 8 had recurrence of the same condition, and 3 had unrelated problems. Intestinal ischemic necrosis was the most common diagnosis at repeat celiotomy, and small intestinal obstruction by adhesions was the second most frequent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2603372     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1990.tb01118.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Surg        ISSN: 0161-3499            Impact factor:   1.495


  6 in total

1.  Postsurgical segmental mesenteric ischemic thrombosis in a horse.

Authors:  María Martín-Cuervo; Luis A Gracia; Verónica Vieitez; Joquin Jiménez; Esther Durán; Luis J Ezquerra
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Development of a laboratory animal model of postoperative small intestinal adhesion formation in the rabbit.

Authors:  E R Singer; M A Livesey; I K Barker; M B Hurtig; P D Conlon
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.310

3.  Intra-abdominal hyaluronan concentration in peritoneal fluid of horses with sudden signs of severe abdominal pain.

Authors:  James D Lillich; Wendy Ray-Miller; Kristopher S Silver; Elizabeth G Davis; Bruce D Schultz
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.156

4.  Causes of gastrointestinal colic in horses in western Canada: 604 cases (1992 to 2002).

Authors:  Sameeh M Abutarbush; James L Carmalt; Ryan W Shoemaker
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.008

5.  Ex Vivo Comparison of a UV-Polymerizable Methacrylate Adhesive versus an Inverting Pattern as the Second Layer of a Two-Layer Hand-Sewn Jejunal Anastomosis in Horses: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Augustin Lenoir; Bertrand R M Perrin; Olivier M Lepage
Journal:  Vet Med Int       Date:  2021-04-04

Review 6.  Peritoneal response to abdominal surgery: the role of equine abdominal adhesions and current prophylactic strategies.

Authors:  Juliana de Moura Alonso; Ana Liz Garcia Alves; Marcos Jun Watanabe; Celso Antonio Rodrigues; Carlos Alberto Hussni
Journal:  Vet Med Int       Date:  2014-01-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.