Literature DB >> 26033297

The Value of Quality Improvement Process in the Detection and Correction of Common Errors in Echocardiographic Hemodynamic Parameters in a Busy Echocardiography Laboratory.

Zaher Fanari1, Usman I Choudhry1, Vivek K Reddy1, Chete Eze-Nliam1, Sumaya Hammami1, Paul Kolm2, William S Weintraub1,2, Erik S Marshall1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of cardiac structures, ventricular function, and hemodynamics is essential for any echocardiographic laboratory. Quality improvement (QI) processes described by the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) and the Intersocietal Commission (IAC) should be instrumental in reaching this goal.
METHODS: All patients undergoing transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) followed by cardiac catheterization within 24 hours at Christiana Care Health System in 2011 and 2012 were identified, with 126 and 133 cases, respectively. Hemodynamic parameters of diastolic function and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) on TTE correlated poorly with catheterization in 2011. An educational process was developed and implemented at quarterly QI meetings based on ASE and IAC recommendations to target frequently encountered errors and provide methods for improved performance. The hemodynamic parameters were then reexamined in 2012 postintervention.
RESULTS: Following the QI process, there was significant improvement in the correlation between invasive and echocardiographic hemodynamic measurements in both systolic and diastolic function, and PASP. This reflected in significant better correlations between echo and cath LVEF [R = 0.88, ICC = 0.87 vs. R = 0.85, ICC = 0.85; P < 0.001], average E/E' and of left ventricle end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) [R = 0.62 vs. R = 0.09, P = 0.006] and a better correlation for PASP [R = 0.77, ICC = 0.77 vs. R = 0.30, ICC = 0.31; P = 0.05] in 2012 compared to 2011.
CONCLUSION: The QI process, as recommended by ASE and IAC, can allow for identification as well as rectification of quality issues in a large regional academic medical center hospital.
© 2015, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Doppler echocardiography; left ventricular end-diastolic pressure; left ventricular function; pulmonary artery hypertension; quality improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26033297      PMCID: PMC4666833          DOI: 10.1111/echo.12976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Echocardiography        ISSN: 0742-2822            Impact factor:   1.724


  10 in total

1.  Improvement in the assessment of diastolic function in a clinical echocardiography laboratory following implementation of a quality improvement initiative.

Authors:  Thomas V Johnson; John D Symanski; Sanjay R Patel; Geoffrey A Rose
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 5.251

2.  Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography.

Authors:  Lawrence G Rudski; Wyman W Lai; Jonathan Afilalo; Lanqi Hua; Mark D Handschumacher; Krishnaswamy Chandrasekaran; Scott D Solomon; Eric K Louie; Nelson B Schiller
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.251

3.  American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for quality echocardiography laboratory operations.

Authors:  Michael H Picard; David Adams; S Michelle Bierig; John M Dent; Pamela S Douglas; Linda D Gillam; Andrew M Keller; David J Malenka; Frederick A Masoudi; Marti McCulloch; Patricia A Pellikka; Priscilla J Peters; Raymond F Stainback; G Monet Strachan; William A Zoghbi
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.251

4.  Can a teaching intervention reduce interobserver variability in LVEF assessment: a quality control exercise in the echocardiography lab.

Authors:  Amer M Johri; Michael H Picard; John Newell; Jane E Marshall; Mary Etta E King; Judy Hung
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-08

5.  Improved interobserver variability and accuracy of echocardiographic visual left ventricular ejection fraction assessment through a self-directed learning program using cardiac magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan; Zoran B Popović; Scott D Flamm; Arun Dahiya; Richard A Grimm; Thomas H Marwick
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 6.  Achieving quality in cardiovascular imaging: proceedings from the American College of Cardiology-Duke University Medical Center Think Tank on Quality in Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Pamela Douglas; Ami E Iskandrian; Harlan M Krumholz; Linda Gillam; Robert Hendel; James Jollis; Eric Peterson; Jersey Chen; Frederick Masoudi; Emile Mohler; Robert L McNamara; Manesh R Patel; John Spertus
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 7.  Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography.

Authors:  Sherif F Nagueh; Christopher P Appleton; Thierry C Gillebert; Paolo N Marino; Jae K Oh; Otto A Smiseth; Alan D Waggoner; Frank A Flachskampf; Patricia A Pellikka; Arturo Evangelista
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.251

8.  Prospective evaluation of the clinical application of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Society of Echocardiography Appropriateness Criteria for transthoracic echocardiography.

Authors:  R Parker Ward; Ibrahim N Mansour; Nicole Lemieux; Nitin Gera; Rupa Mehta; Roberto M Lang
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-09

9.  Quality in echocardiography: does it make a difference?

Authors:  Rory B Weiner; Michael H Picard
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.251

10.  Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  D F Ransohoff; A R Feinstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-10-26       Impact factor: 91.245

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Quality Improvement Methodology Facilitates Adherence to Echocardiogram Protocol Measurements.

Authors:  Saira Siddiqui; Eunice Hahn; Garick D Hill; James Brown; Katherine Lehmkuhl; Christopher Statile
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2022-01-21

Review 2.  Quality Assurance and Improvement Project in Echocardiography Laboratory: The Pivotal Importance of Organizational and Managerial Processes.

Authors:  Antoine Kossaify
Journal:  Heart Views       Date:  2021-04-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.