Literature DB >> 26032832

Evaluation of the Fukuoka Consensus Guidelines for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: Results from a systematic review of 1,382 surgically resected patients.

Brian K P Goh1, Zhimin Lin2, Damien M Y Tan3, Choon-Hua Thng4, Christopher J L Khor3, Tony K H Lim5, London L P J Ooi6, Alexander Y F Chung7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: International consensus guidelines to guide management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) were revised in Fukuoka and published in 2012. However, despite widespread acceptance of the Fukuoka Consensus Guidelines (FCG), the utility of these guidelines have not been well-validated. This systematic review was performed to evaluate the clinical utility of the FCG.
DESIGN: A computerized search of the PubMed and Scopus databases was performed to identify all studies evaluating the utility of the FCG in surgically resected IPMN. IPMN were stratified according to the FCG as high risk (HR), worrisome risk (WR), and low risk (LR). HR and WR IPMN were termed FCG+ve and LR IPMN were termed FCG-ve.
RESULTS: Seven studies analyzing 1,382 patients were included. There were 402 malignant neoplasms (29%), including 242 invasive IPMNs. There were 1,000 IPMN classified as FCG+ve. The FCG+ve group had a positive predictive value (PPV) ranging from 27 to 62% and the FCG-ve group had negative predictive value ranging from 82 to 100%. Pooled analysis demonstrated that there was 362 of 1,000 (36%) malignant FCG+ve IPMN and 342 of 382 (90%) benign FCG-ve IPMN. PPV of the HR group and the WR groups alone were 104 of 158 (66%) and 75 of 261 (29%), respectively. Forty of 382 (11%), including 22 (6%) invasive FCG-ve IPMN, were malignant. Twenty-six malignant including 18 invasive FCG-ve IPMN were reported from a single study. When the results from this study were excluded, there were only 14 of 241 malignant neoplasms (6%), including 4 of 241 (2%) invasive FCG-ve IPMN in the remaining 6 studies.
CONCLUSION: The FCG+ve criteria had a similarly low PPV compared with the 2006 consensus criteria. Stratification of IPMN into HR and WR groups resulted in a higher PPV in the HR group. Some malignant and even invasive IPMN may be missed by the FCG criteria.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26032832     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.03.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  18 in total

Review 1.  Novel Biomarkers for Pancreatic Cysts.

Authors:  Harkirat Singh; Kevin McGrath; Aatur D Singhi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Molecular Diagnostics and Testing for Pancreatic Cysts.

Authors:  Jaime de la Fuente; Shounak Majumder
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-01-27

3.  Evaluation of the International Consensus Guidelines for the Surgical Resection of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms.

Authors:  Mariko Tsukagoshi; Kenichiro Araki; Fumiyoshi Saito; Norio Kubo; Akira Watanabe; Takamichi Igarashi; Norihiro Ishii; Takahiro Yamanaka; Ken Shirabe; Hiroyuki Kuwano
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Current best practice and controversies in the follow up of patients with asymptomatic branch duct IPMN of the pancreas.

Authors:  Masao Tanaka
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Highly Accurate Identification of Cystic Precursor Lesions of Pancreatic Cancer Through Targeted Mass Spectrometry: A Phase IIc Diagnostic Study.

Authors:  Karolina S Jabbar; Liisa Arike; Caroline S Verbeke; Riadh Sadik; Gunnar C Hansson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas: recommendations for Standardized Imaging and Reporting from the Society of Abdominal Radiology IPMN disease focused panel.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Hecht; Gaurav Khatri; Desiree Morgan; Stella Kang; Priya R Bhosale; Isaac R Francis; Namita S Gandhi; David M Hough; Chenchan Huang; Lyndon Luk; Alec Megibow; Justin M Ream; Dushyant Sahani; Vahid Yaghmai; Atif Zaheer; Ravi Kaza
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-11-13

7.  International guidelines for the management of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.

Authors:  Brian K P Goh
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Pancreatic Cysts and Guidelines.

Authors:  James J Farrell
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 9.  Surveillance of Cystic Lesions of the Pancreas: Whom and How to Survey?

Authors:  Stefano Andrianello; Massimo Falconi; Roberto Salvia; Stefano Crippa; Giovanni Marchegiani
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2018-06-13

Review 10.  Elevating pancreatic cystic lesion stratification: Current and future pancreatic cancer biomarker(s).

Authors:  Joseph Carmicheal; Asish Patel; Vipin Dalal; Pranita Atri; Amaninder S Dhaliwal; Uwe A Wittel; Mokenge P Malafa; Geoffrey Talmon; Benjamin J Swanson; Shailender Singh; Maneesh Jain; Sukhwinder Kaur; Surinder K Batra
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 10.680

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.