Literature DB >> 2603259

Radiological examination of the small bowel.

A M Gilchrist, J O Mills.   

Abstract

A retrospective study was made of 100 consecutive dedicated per-oral small bowel examinations. 33% of the studies were abnormal, of which almost half were due to Crohn's disease. When grouped according to clinical suspicion, 73.5% of those studies with a high index of clinical suspicion were abnormal. In the abnormal group a correct diagnosis was made in 90%, with two false positives. In the normal group a correct diagnosis was made in 91%, with no false negatives. It is suggested that the dedicated small bowel series offers a justifiable and practical alternative to other techniques such as intubation and direct infusion of contrast medium into the small bowel, or enteroclysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2603259      PMCID: PMC2448215     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ulster Med J        ISSN: 0041-6193


  17 in total

1.  Perspective: the small bowel examination in the diagnosis of Crohn's disease.

Authors:  H C Carlson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Detailed per-oral small bowel examination vs. enteroclysis. Part II: Radiographic accuracy.

Authors:  D J Ott; Y M Chen; D W Gelfand; F Van Swearingen; H A Munitz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Lesions missed on small-bowel follow-through: analysis and recommendations.

Authors:  D D Maglinte; B T Burney; R E Miller
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Preliminary colon cleansing for small-bowel examinations: results and implications of a prospective survey.

Authors:  C J Garvey; G de Lacey; R A Wilkins
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 5.  Double-contrast examination. Part II: Small intestine.

Authors:  D Lintott; H Herlinger
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1984-01

6.  Detailed per-oral small bowel examination vs. enteroclysis. Part I: Expenditures and radiation exposure.

Authors:  D J Ott; Y M Chen; D W Gelfand; F Van Swearingen; H A Munitz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  The small bowel enema: experience with 150 examination.

Authors:  D E Sanders; C S Ho
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Radiologic examination of the small intestine: review of 402 cases and discussion of indications and methods.

Authors:  W C Diner; E O Hoskins; F Navab
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 0.954

Review 9.  Small bowel radiography: how, when, and why?

Authors:  D D Maglinte; J C Lappas; F M Kelvin; D Rex; S M Chernish
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Double-contrast small-bowel examination with barium and methylcellulose.

Authors:  G Antes; J Lissner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.