| Literature DB >> 26032514 |
Cindy Varga1, Wanling Xie1, Jacob Laubach1, Irene M Ghobrial1, Elizabeth K O'Donnell2, Matthew Weinstock1, Claudia Paba-Prada1, Diane Warren1, Michelle E Maglio1, Robert Schlossman1, Nikhil C Munshi1, Noopur Raje2, Edie Weller1, Kenneth C Anderson1, Constantine S Mitsiades2, Paul G Richardson1.
Abstract
Proteasome inhibitors (PI) and immunomodulatory agents (IMIDs) have improved the overall survival (OS) of patients with multiple myeloma (MM), but concerns have been raised about increased incidence of extramedullary disease (EMD) after the combined use of PIs and IMIDs for upfront therapy. We evaluated whether the addition of lenalidomide to bortezomib-based front-line regimens precipitated earlier development of EMD. We reviewed the charts of 117 MM patients (median follow-up from diagnosis 6·1 years; range 0·1-10·2 years) enrolled in eight clinical trials of first-line treatment with bortezomib-based regimens, with or without lenalidomide. We assessed development of EMD as extraosseous (distant from bone) or osseous (originating from bone) plasmacytomas. The primary endpoint was time from diagnosis until development of EMD, based on imaging, biopsy and/or physical examination. Any form of EMD at progression was observed in 40 (34·2%) patients, including 21 (18%) osseous, 8 (7%) extraosseous and 11 (9%) both osseous and extraosseous. Median OS was 0·9 years (range 0·1-4·8 years) after extraosseous EMD development. Sensitivity analyses with follow-up times truncated at 5 years detected no statistically significant difference in rates of any EMD form between the two groups (P > 0·2 for each comparison). Therefore, we observed no evidence that bortezomib-lenalidomide-based front-line therapy precipitates earlier EMD.Entities:
Keywords: bortezomib; extramedullary disease; extraosseous plasmacytoma; lenalidomide; multiple myeloma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26032514 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.13382
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Haematol ISSN: 0007-1048 Impact factor: 6.998