Literature DB >> 26031720

Online quizzes promote inconsistent improvements on in-class test performance in introductory anatomy and physiology.

Gregory A Brown1, Matthew R Bice2, Brandon S Shaw3, Ina Shaw4.   

Abstract

Review quizzes can provide students with feedback and assist in the preparation for in-class tests, but students often do not voluntarily use self-testing resources. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate if taking a mandatory online review quiz alters performance on subsequent in-class tests. During two semesters of a single-semester introductory anatomy and physiology course, students were required to complete brief online quizzes after each textbook chapter had been covered during lecture as well as the day before an in-class test. During the next two semesters, students were not required to take the online review quizzes. Overall scores on chapter specific in-class tests were higher (P < 0.05) during the semesters in which students took online review quizzes (82.9 ± 14.3%) compared with when they did not (78.7 ± 15.5%), but all in-class tests were not improved. Scores on comprehensive midterm examinations were higher (83.0 ± 12.9% vs. 78.9 ± 13.7%, P < 0.05) but not on final examinations (72.4 ± 13.8% vs. 71.8 ± 14.0%) between those with online review quizzes and those without, respectively. Overall scores on in-class tests and comprehensive examinations were higher (P < 0.05) during the semesters in which students took online review quizzes (83.4 ± 16.8%) compared with when they did not (80.3 ± 17.6%). These data suggest that an online review quiz taken the day before an in-class test increases performance on some in-class tests. However, online review quizzes taken after completion of each chapter do not consistently enhance performance on comprehensive examinations.
Copyright © 2015 The American Physiological Society.

Keywords:  exercise science; formative assessment; internet testing; summative assessment; undergraduate

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26031720     DOI: 10.1152/advan.00064.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ        ISSN: 1043-4046            Impact factor:   2.288


  2 in total

1.  Interexaminer Reliability and Validity of Quantity of Cervical Mobility during Online Dynamic Inspection.

Authors:  Leire Leonet-Tijero; Jaime Corral-de-Toro; Jacobo Rodríguez-Sanz; Mar Hernández-Secorún; Hugo Abenia-Benedí; María Orosia Lucha-López; Sofía Monti-Ballano; Julián Müller-Thyssen-Uriarte; Héctor Tricás-Vidal; César Hidalgo-García; José Miguel Tricás-Moreno
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-21

2.  Blended Learning: The impact of blackboard formative assessment on the final marks and students' perception of its effectiveness.

Authors:  Mukhtiar Baig; Zohair Jamil Gazzaz; Mohammed Farouq
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.