| Literature DB >> 26031648 |
Matthieu Sailly1, Rod Whiteley2, John W Read3, Bruno Giuffre4, Amanda Johnson5, Per Hölmich6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sport-related pubalgia is often a diagnostic challenge in elite athletes. While scientific attention has focused on adults, there is little data on adolescents. Cadaveric and imaging studies identify a secondary ossification centre located along the anteromedial corner of pubis beneath the insertions of symphysial joint capsule and adductor longus tendon. Little is known about this apophysis and its response to chronic stress. AIM: We report pubic apophysitis as a clinically relevant entity in adolescent athletes.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescent; Growth; Pelvic; Soccer; Tendon
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26031648 PMCID: PMC4484496 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094436
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Sports Med ISSN: 0306-3674 Impact factor: 13.800
Figure 1Axial CT scan depicting the clinical staging of maturation (stages 1, 2, 3a and 3b) from the comparison group. A secondary centre of ossification (stage 2) was deemed to be present only if a growth plate was definitely either partially or completely visible between the ossification centre and the metaphysis.
Investigations performed and ages for each athlete in the clinical (painful) group
| Athlete | X-ray | Ultrasound | MRI | CT | Age at X-ray |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yes | No | Yes | No | 14.9 |
| 2 | Yes | Yes | No | No | 15.5 |
| 3 | Yes | No | Yes | No | 16.7 |
| 4 | Yes | Yes | No | No | 15.4 |
| 5 | Yes | Yes | No | No | 16.1 |
| 6 | Yes | Yes | No | No | 16.9 |
| 7 | Yes | No | No | No | 16.5 |
| 8 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 18.0 |
| 9 | Yes | No | No | No | 16.2 |
| 10 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 16.9 |
| 11 | Yes | No | No | No | 16.3 |
| 12 | Yes | Yes | No | No | 16.8 |
| 13 | Yes | Yes | No | No | 16.1 |
| 14 | Yes | Yes | No | No | 14.5 |
| 15 | Yes | No | Yes | No | 14.4 |
| 16 | Yes | No | No | No | 16.8 |
| 17 | Yes | No | Yes | No | 13.8 |
| 18 | Yes | No | Yes | No | 13.9 |
| 19 | Yes | No | Yes | No | 13.3 |
| 20 | Yes | No | No | Yes | 13.6 |
| 21 | Yes | No | Yes | No | 15.3 |
| 22 | Yes | No | Yes | No | 14.6 |
| 23 | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | 17.0 |
| 24 | Yes | No | No | Yes | 14.0 |
| 25 | Yes | No | No | Yes | 17.5 |
| 26 | Yes | No | No | Yes | 15.0 |
| Totals | 26 | 9 | 11 | 7 | |
| Average | 15.61 | ||||
| S.D | 1.32 | ||||
| Minimum | 13.3 | ||||
| Maximum | 18.0 | ||||
Figure 2Anteroposterior pelvic X-ray showing pubic symphysis stress-related signs.
Figure 3Ultrasound appearance of a stage 2 subject (longitudinal section, superior is left in the image, anterior is upper). Note the cortical irregularity at the anterior and inferior aspect of the pubic symphysis.
Figure 4T1 fat-saturation MRI showing depiction of the pubic symphysis and adjacent apophysis.
Figure 5Axial CT scan depicting pubic apophysis.
Figure 6CT scans from three of the participants within the symptomatic group demonstrating stress-related changes at the pubis. (A) Cystic changes; (B) asymmetrical irregularities and cystic changes and (C) unilateral widening of the pubic apophysis.
Figure 7Distribution of the maturation status (stages 1–4) of the 31 asymptomatic comparison subjects (as determined by CT examination) according to chronological age (years).