Elena Flowers1, Bradley E Aouizerat2, Fahim Abbasi3, Cynthia Lamendola3, Kaylene M Grove3, Yoshimi Fukuoka4, Gerald M Reaven3. 1. Department of Physiological Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, USA. Electronic address: elena.flowers@ucsf.edu. 2. Department of Physiological Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, USA; Institute for Human Genetics, University of California, San Francisco, USA. 3. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, USA. 4. Instutue for Health and Aging, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The aims of this study were to compare microRNA (miR) expression between individuals with and without insulin resistance and to determine whether miRs predict response to thiazolidinedione treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a sample of 93 healthy adults, insulin resistance was defined as steady state plasma glucose (SSPG)≥180 mg/dL and insulin sensitive as <120 mg/dL. Response to thiazolidinedione therapy was defined as ≥10% decrease in SSPG. We selected a panel of microRNAs based on prior evidence for a role in insulin or glucose metabolism. Fold change and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were calculated for the 25 miRs measured. RESULTS: At baseline, 81% (n=75) of participants were insulin resistant. Five miRs were differentially expressed between the insulin resistant and sensitive groups: miR-193b (1.45 fold change (FC)), miR-22-3p (1.15 FC), miR-320a (1.36 FC), miR-375 (0.59 FC), and miR-486 (1.21 FC) (all p<0.05). In the subset who were insulin resistant at baseline and received thiazolidinediones (n=47), 77% (n=36) showed improved insulin sensitivity. Six miRs were differentially expressed between responders compared to non-responders: miR-20b-5p (1.20 FC), miR-21-5p, (0.92 FC), miR-214-3p (1.13 FC), miR-22-3p (1.14 FC), miR-320a (0.98 FC), and miR-486-5p (1.25 FC) (all p<0.05). DISCUSSION: This study is the first to report miRs associated with response to a pharmacologic intervention for insulin resistance. MiR-320a and miR-486-5p identified responders to thiazolidinedione therapy among the insulin resistant group.
INTRODUCTION: The aims of this study were to compare microRNA (miR) expression between individuals with and without insulin resistance and to determine whether miRs predict response to thiazolidinedione treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a sample of 93 healthy adults, insulin resistance was defined as steady state plasma glucose (SSPG)≥180 mg/dL and insulin sensitive as <120 mg/dL. Response to thiazolidinedione therapy was defined as ≥10% decrease in SSPG. We selected a panel of microRNAs based on prior evidence for a role in insulin or glucose metabolism. Fold change and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were calculated for the 25 miRs measured. RESULTS: At baseline, 81% (n=75) of participants were insulin resistant. Five miRs were differentially expressed between the insulin resistant and sensitive groups: miR-193b (1.45 fold change (FC)), miR-22-3p (1.15 FC), miR-320a (1.36 FC), miR-375 (0.59 FC), and miR-486 (1.21 FC) (all p<0.05). In the subset who were insulin resistant at baseline and received thiazolidinediones (n=47), 77% (n=36) showed improved insulin sensitivity. Six miRs were differentially expressed between responders compared to non-responders: miR-20b-5p (1.20 FC), miR-21-5p, (0.92 FC), miR-214-3p (1.13 FC), miR-22-3p (1.14 FC), miR-320a (0.98 FC), and miR-486-5p (1.25 FC) (all p<0.05). DISCUSSION: This study is the first to report miRs associated with response to a pharmacologic intervention for insulin resistance. MiR-320a and miR-486-5p identified responders to thiazolidinedione therapy among the insulin resistant group.
Authors: Daniel Einhorn; Gerald M Reaven; Rhoda H Cobin; Earl Ford; Om P Ganda; Yehuda Handelsman; Richard Hellman; Paul S Jellinger; David Kendall; Ronald M Krauss; Naomi D Neufeld; Steven M Petak; Helena W Rodbard; John A Seibel; Donald A Smith; Peter W F Wilson Journal: Endocr Pract Date: 2003 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: Eric M Small; Jason R O'Rourke; Viviana Moresi; Lillian B Sutherland; John McAnally; Robert D Gerard; James A Richardson; Eric N Olson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-02-08 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Francisco J Ortega; Josep M Mercader; José María Moreno-Navarrete; Oscar Rovira; Ester Guerra; Eduardo Esteve; Gemma Xifra; Cristina Martínez; Wifredo Ricart; Jennifer Rieusset; Sophie Rome; Monika Karczewska-Kupczewska; Marek Straczkowski; José Manuel Fernández-Real Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2014-01-29 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Kasey C Vickers; Brian T Palmisano; Bassem M Shoucri; Robert D Shamburek; Alan T Remaley Journal: Nat Cell Biol Date: 2011-03-20 Impact factor: 28.824
Authors: Dwi Setyowati Karolina; Arunmozhiarasi Armugam; Subramaniam Tavintharan; Michael T K Wong; Su Chi Lim; Chee Fang Sum; Kandiah Jeyaseelan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-08-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Silvio E Inzucchi; Richard M Bergenstal; John B Buse; Michaela Diamant; Ele Ferrannini; Michael Nauck; Anne L Peters; Apostolos Tsapas; Richard Wender; David R Matthews Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-04-19 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Lee M Margolis; Sarah J Lessard; Yassine Ezzyat; Roger A Fielding; Donato A Rivas Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Z Soyman; S Durmus; S Ates; G Simsek; V Sozer; B P Kundaktepe; D Kurtulus; R Gelisgen; V Sal; H Uzun Journal: Acta Endocrinol (Buchar) Date: 2022 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 1.104
Authors: Dennis Dahlmans; Alexandre Houzelle; Pénélope Andreux; Johanna A Jörgensen; Xu Wang; Leon J de Windt; Patrick Schrauwen; Johan Auwerx; Joris Hoeks Journal: Mol Metab Date: 2017-08-31 Impact factor: 7.422