Literature DB >> 26031487

Eliminating mirror responses by instructions.

Lara Bardi1, Carsten Bundt2, Wim Notebaert2, Marcel Brass2.   

Abstract

The observation of an action leads to the activation of the corresponding motor plan in the observer. This phenomenon of motor resonance has an important role in social interaction, promoting imitation, learning and action understanding. However, mirror responses not always have a positive impact on our behavior. An automatic tendency to imitate others can introduce interference in action execution and non-imitative or opposite responses have an advantage in some contexts. Previous studies suggest that mirror tendencies can be suppressed after extensive practice or in complementary joint action situations revealing that mirror responses are more flexible than previously thought. The aim of the present study was to gain insight into the mechanisms that allow response flexibility of motor mirroring. Here we show that the mere instruction of a counter-imitative mapping changes mirror responses as indexed by motor evoked potentials (MEPs) enhancement induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Importantly, mirror activation was measured while participants were passively watching finger movements, without having the opportunity to execute the task. This result suggests that the implementation of task instructions activates stimulus-response association that can overwrite the mirror representations. Our outcome reveals one of the crucial mechanisms that might allow flexible adjustments of mirror responses in different contexts. The implications of this outcome are discussed.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MEPs; Mirror system; Response flexibility; TMS; Task instructions

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26031487     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  8 in total

1.  Self-selected conscious strategies do not modulate motor cortical output during action observation.

Authors:  Katherine R Naish; Sukhvinder S Obhi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The instruction-based congruency effect predicts task execution efficiency: Evidence from inter- and intra-individual differences.

Authors:  Senne Braem; Berre Deltomme; Baptist Liefooghe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-11

3.  Automatic selection and feature extraction of motor-evoked potentials by transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke patients.

Authors:  Jose E Tecuapetla-Trejo; Jessica Cantillo-Negrete; Paul Carrillo-Mora; Raquel Valdés-Cristerna; Emmanuel Ortega-Robles; Oscar Arias-Carrion; Ruben I Carino-Escobar
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Reaction Time "Mismatch Costs" Change with the Likelihood of Stimulus-Response Compatibility.

Authors:  Megan E J Campbell; Chase S Sherwell; Ross Cunnington; Scott Brown; Michael Breakspear
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-08-25

5.  Directing visual attention during action observation modulates corticospinal excitability.

Authors:  David J Wright; Greg Wood; Zoe C Franklin; Ben Marshall; Martin Riach; Paul S Holmes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Social Motor Priming: when offline interference facilitates motor execution.

Authors:  Sonia Betti; Eris Chinellato; Silvia Guerra; Umberto Castiello; Luisa Sartori
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Behavioral and TMS Markers of Action Observation Might Reflect Distinct Neuronal Processes.

Authors:  Sébastien Hétu; Vincent Taschereau-Dumouchel; Hadj Boumediene Meziane; Philip L Jackson; Catherine Mercier
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  What Happened to Mirror Neurons?

Authors:  Cecilia Heyes; Caroline Catmur
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-07-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.