R E Allen1, M Morlando2, B Thilaganathan2, J Zamora3,4, K S Khan5,6, S Thangaratinam5,6, A Bhide2. 1. Fetal Medicine Centre, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK. 2. Fetal Medicine Unit, St George's Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK. 3. Clinical Biostatistics Unit, Hospital Ramon y Cajal (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain. 4. CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain. 5. Women's Health Research Unit, Multidisciplinary Evidence Synthesis Hub (mEsh), Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK. 6. London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the predictive accuracy for stillbirth of second-trimester uterine artery Doppler. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library databases from inception until March 2015 without language restrictions. The included studies were those that assessed the association of abnormal uterine artery Doppler parameters and stillbirth. Two independent reviewers selected the studies, extracted data and assessed quality. Results for studies that were performed in the second trimester were pooled and summary estimates of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and their 95% confidence intervals were obtained. An overall summary of test accuracy was provided by the diagnostic odds ratio. Subgroup analysis was performed according to whether the study population was high risk or unselected. RESULTS: Literature searches returned 338 relevant citations with 32 considered in full. Thirteen studies met our search criteria (85 845 women, 508 stillbirths) and were included in the review. Bivariate pooled estimate for sensitivity was 65% (95% CI, 38-85%) and for specificity 82% (95% CI, 72-88%). The positive likelihood ratio was 3.5 (95% CI, 2.3-5.5) and negative likelihood ratio 0.43 (95% CI, 0.22-0.85). The diagnostic odds ratio was 8.3 (95% CI, 3.0-22.4). Heterogeneity was high in the studies of high-risk women. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal uterine artery Doppler indices are associated with a three- to four-fold increase in the risk of stillbirth. The heterogeneity was particularly high in the high-risk group rendering it impossible to draw firm conclusions. In view of this, there is a role for individual patient data meta-analysis to define which Doppler parameter and threshold value should be measured.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the predictive accuracy for stillbirth of second-trimester uterine artery Doppler. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library databases from inception until March 2015 without language restrictions. The included studies were those that assessed the association of abnormal uterine artery Doppler parameters and stillbirth. Two independent reviewers selected the studies, extracted data and assessed quality. Results for studies that were performed in the second trimester were pooled and summary estimates of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and their 95% confidence intervals were obtained. An overall summary of test accuracy was provided by the diagnostic odds ratio. Subgroup analysis was performed according to whether the study population was high risk or unselected. RESULTS: Literature searches returned 338 relevant citations with 32 considered in full. Thirteen studies met our search criteria (85 845 women, 508 stillbirths) and were included in the review. Bivariate pooled estimate for sensitivity was 65% (95% CI, 38-85%) and for specificity 82% (95% CI, 72-88%). The positive likelihood ratio was 3.5 (95% CI, 2.3-5.5) and negative likelihood ratio 0.43 (95% CI, 0.22-0.85). The diagnostic odds ratio was 8.3 (95% CI, 3.0-22.4). Heterogeneity was high in the studies of high-risk women. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal uterine artery Doppler indices are associated with a three- to four-fold increase in the risk of stillbirth. The heterogeneity was particularly high in the high-risk group rendering it impossible to draw firm conclusions. In view of this, there is a role for individual patient data meta-analysis to define which Doppler parameter and threshold value should be measured.
Authors: J W Nijkamp; N J Sebire; K Bouman; F J Korteweg; J J H M Erwich; S J Gordijn Journal: Semin Fetal Neonatal Med Date: 2017-03-18 Impact factor: 3.926
Authors: Samantha C Lean; Alexander E P Heazell; Mark R Dilworth; Tracey A Mills; Rebecca L Jones Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 4.379