Shakiba Shahabi1, Laura Treccani1, Ralf Dringen2, Kurosch Rezwan1. 1. †Advanced Ceramics, University of Bremen, Am Biologischen Garten 2, 28359 Bremen, Germany. 2. ‡Centre for Biomolecular Interactions Bremen and Centre for Environmental Research and Sustainable Technology, Faculty 2 (Biology/Chemistry), University of Bremen, Leobener Strasse, NW2, 28359 Bremen, Germany.
Abstract
To study the importance of the surface charge for cellular uptake of silica nanoparticles (NPs), we synthesized five different single- or multifunctionalized fluorescent silica NPs (FFSNPs) by introducing various ratios of amino and sulfonate groups into their surface. The zeta potential values of these FFSNPs were customized from highly positive to highly negative, while other physicochemical properties remained almost constant. Irrespective of the original surface charge, serum proteins adsorbed onto the surface, neutralized the zeta potential values, and prevented the aggregation of the tailor-made FFSNPs. Depending on the surface charge and on the absence or presence of serum, two opposite trends were found concerning the cellular uptake of FFSNPs. In the absence of serum, positively charged NPs were more strongly accumulated by human osteoblast (HOB) cells than negatively charged NPs. In contrast, in serum-containing medium, anionic FFSNPs were internalized by HOB cells more strongly, despite the similar size and surface charge of all types of protein-covered FFSNPs. Thus, at physiological condition, when the presence of proteins is inevitable, sulfonate-functionalized silica NPs are the favorite choice to achieve a desired high rate of NP internalization.
To study the importance of the surface charge for cellular uptake of silica nanoparticles (NPs), we synthesized five different single- or multifunctionalized fluorescent silica NPs (FFSNPs) by introducing various ratios of amino and sulfonate groups into their surface. The zeta potential values of these FFSNPs were customized from highly positive to highly negative, while other physicochemical properties remained almost constant. Irrespective of the original surface charge, serum proteins adsorbed onto the surface, neutralized the zeta potential values, and prevented the aggregation of the tailor-made FFSNPs. Depending on the surface charge and on the absence or presence of serum, two opposite trends were found concerning the cellular uptake of FFSNPs. In the absence of serum, positively charged NPs were more strongly accumulated by human osteoblast (HOB) cells than negatively charged NPs. In contrast, in serum-containing medium, anionic FFSNPs were internalized by HOB cells more strongly, despite the similar size and surface charge of all types of protein-covered FFSNPs. Thus, at physiological condition, when the presence of proteins is inevitable, sulfonate-functionalized silica NPs are the favorite choice to achieve a desired high rate of NP internalization.
Silica
nanoparticles (NPs)
are a versatile, relevant system for various biomedical applications
such as sensing,[1,2] imaging,[3,4] drug
delivery,[5,6] DNA carriers,[7,8] and bioassays.[9] Due to their intrinsic features like high chemical
stability, biocompatibility,[10] optical
transparency,[11] and aqueous dispersibility,[12] silica NPs occupy a predominant position in
biotechnology and medicine. Moreover, silica NPs can be easily functionalized,[13] and specific agents like peptides, proteins,
and antibodies can be conjugated for cellular targeting.[14,15]Despite many established bioconjugation strategies for targeting
purposes with silica NPs, concerns regarding their clinical success
have risen. Recently, it has been shown that the targeting capability
and stability of bioconjugated NPs may disappear when they are placed
in a biological environment.[16,17] The primary reason
is the presence of a complex mixture of distinct proteins in the biological
media.[18,19] Prior to cellular uptake, these proteins
adsorb rapidly onto the surface of NPs, leading to the formation of
a so-called “corona”,[19−22] which may obscure specific recognition
of bioligands on the NP surface and hamper their targeting applicability.[17,23] Indeed, at physiological conditions, biological systems are often
exposed to NP–protein corona complexes, which differ significantly
from bare NPs and define surface properties, aggregation rate, and
hydrodynamic size of NPs.[19,24,25]Protein corona formation is complex, inevitable, and unpredictable,
but it is believed that NP surface properties can indirectly affect
corona composition and evolution.[24] Surface
functional groups are considered as the primary key factor to have
a significant impact on protein binding[26,27] and subsequently
also on biological behaviors such as tissue diffusion,[28] biodistribution,[29] and cellular uptake.[30,31]The purpose of this study
is to assess how surface functional groups on silica NP can be exploited
to control cell responses in the presence and absence of serum proteins.
We first report the synthesis of functionalized fluorescent silica
NPs (FFSNPs) based on a reverse microemulsion method, which was followed
by introducing amino and sulfonate groups at carefully chosen concentrations
to generate single- or multifunctionalized silica NPs. Thereby, the
surface charge was tuned successfully over a broad range from highly
positive to highly negative, whereas other properties such as size,
morphology, specific surface area, hydrophilicity, and fluorescence
signal intensity remained approximately constant. This strategy enabled
us to separate the effect of the net surface charge from the effects
of the other mentioned physicochemical properties and to solely investigate
the influence of surface charge on the interactions of the silica
NPs with proteins and cells, without interference by other factors.
The synthesized FFSNPs were characterized by scanning electron microscopy
(SEM), scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), fluorescence
microscopy, fluorescence spectroscopy, specific surface area (BET),
adsorption capacity of polar and nonpolar gases, zeta potential, and
dynamic light scattering (DLS). In order to understand how adsorbed
serum proteins on FFSNPs affect the surface properties and the aggregation
behavior, a combination of zeta potential and hydrodynamic diameter
(DH) measurements were performed in different
media, including water, bovine serum albumin (BSA) containing water,
and serum-supplemented and serum-free cell culture media under conditions
identical to those used for cell experiments.Our goal was to
determine how the cellular uptake of FFSNPs would be affected by the
surface charge and/or by the presence of attached serum proteins.
To address these questions, the uptake and subcellular localization
of cationic, neutral, and anionic FFSNPs within human osteoblast (HOB)
cells under serum-containing and serum-free conditions were compared.
The data obtained in these studies were linked to the investigation
of the cytotoxic potential for the respective conditions.
Materials and Methods
Materials
For particle synthesis, 1-hexanol (anhydrous, >99%, lot no.
SHBC1238 V), Triton X-100 (lot no. BCBH1109 V), tetraethoxysilane
(TEOS, >99%, lot no. BCBK1670 V), 25% aqueous ammonia solution
(NH4OH, lot no. SZBB0250 V), rhodamine B isothiocyanate
(RBITC, mixed isomers, lot no. MKBJ9031 V), 3-aminopropyl-triethoxysilane
(APTES, >98%, lot no. BCBH2173 V), and absolute ethanol (>98%,
lot no. SZBB1570 V) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Germany). 3-(Trihydroxysilyl)-1-propanesulfonic
acid (HSPSA, 30–35% in H2O, lot no. 1246512, ABCR,
Germany), cyclohexane (anhydrous, 99.5%, batch no. 13B070516, VWR,
Germany), bovine serum albumin (BSA, 99% protein, molecular weight
66.5 kDa, lot no. SLBG1645 V), and Pierce BCA protein assay (lot no.
OC 185009, Thermo Scientific, Germany) were obtained from different
suppliers as specified.Cell culture tests were carried out
on human osteoblast cells (HOB, lot no. 232R020412 obtained from Provitro
(Germany)). Dulbecco/Vogt modified Eagle’s minimal essential
medium (DMEM, high glucose, lot no. 1206393), antibiotic-antimycotic
(AB/AM, lot no. 1209917), Alexa Fluor 488 phalloidin (AF488, 2U/mL,
lot no. 1151587), and LysoTracker (DND-22, lot no. 791512) from Invitrogen
(Germany) and fetal calf serum (FCS, lot no. 010M3395), paraformaldehyde
(PFA, lot no. 53260), phosphate buffered saline (PBS, lot no. SLBF5741
V), trypsin/ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) (0.25% trypsin,
0.02% EDTA, lot no. SLBG4376), Triton X-100 (lot no. MKBL5839 V),
sodium chloride (NaCl, lot no. 038 K00451), 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
(DAPI, 0.5 μg/mL, lot no. 1242642), chlorpromazine hydrochloride
(lot no. 027M3145), wortmannin (lot no. 023M4072 V), nystatin (lot
no. 020M13491), and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, lot no. 055 K01033)
from Sigma-Aldrich (Germany) were used. Water-soluble tetrazolium
salt (WST-1) cell proliferation assay (lot no. 14310400, Roche Diagnostics
GmbH, Germany) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) Pierce assay (lot no.
OL17881450, Thermo Scientific, Germany) were purchased from the suppliers
as specified. Double deionized water (ddH2O) with a conductivity
of <0.4 μS/cm was obtained from an ultrapure water system
(Synergy, Millipore Corp., USA) and used as solvent for all solutions.
Preparation of Functionalized Silica NPs
FFSNPs were synthesized by a water-in-oil reverse microemulsion method
according to refs (14 and 32) and as schematically shown in Scheme 1a.
To covalently incorporate the dye in the silica matrix, RBITC was
modified by inducing a reaction between the cyanate groups with the
amino group of APTES. The RBITC derivative was prepared by adding
APTES to RBITC previously dissolved in absolute ethanol (final concentration
1 mM) at the molar ratio of 1:1 (APTES/RBTIC). The mixtures was kept
under darkness and stirred for 12 h at room temperature.
Scheme 1
Schematic Illustration of the Synthesis and Simultaneous Functionalization
of FFSNPs Using APTES and HSPSA (a) and of the Synthesized Particles
Considering the Initial Molar Ratio of Functional Amino and Sulfonate
Groups Used in the Synthesis (b) According to Table 1
The
microemulsion was formed by mixing 15 mL of cyclohexane, 3.6 mL of
1-hexanol, 3.54 mL of Triton X-100, and 1.1 mL of ddH2O
and stirred at room temperature for 10 min prior to the addition of
200 μL of the dye solution. After stirring for 30 min, 200 μL
of tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) and 120 μL of ammonia solution (NH4OH) were added to initiate the hydrolysis and condensation.
The reaction mixture was stirred for 24 h at room temperature before
introducing amino or/and sulfonate groups to functionalize the NPs.
As illustrated in Scheme 1b and Table 1, for single-functionalized
NPs (100A and 100H), 0.11 mM 3-aminopropyl-triethoxysilane (APTES)
or 3-(trihydroxysilyl)-1-propanesulfonic acid (HSPSA) was used, whereas
the other three NPs (75A + 25H, 50A + 50H, and 25A + 75H) were mixed-functionalized
with the appropriate molar ratios of APTES to HSPSA. The lowest possible
amount of both reagents for functionalization was optimized to tune
the zeta potential of the final NPs but keeping the other properties
almost constant, as later discussed. After 24 h, stirring the reaction
was stopped by addition of acetone. Afterward, FFSNPs were collected
by centrifugation and washed several times with absolute ethanol and
ddH2O to remove any unreacted chemicals and free dye molecules.
Table 1
Physiochemical Properties of the Synthesized
FFSNPs
sample
abbreviation
molar ratio
of APTES
molar ratio of HSPSA
diameter (SEM [nm])
PDI
specific surface area [m2/g]
water vapor adsorption [μmol/m2]
n-heptane
adsorption [μmol/m2]
100% APTES
100A
1
0
58 ± 2
0.14 ± 0.03
48.7 ± 4.3
76.3 ± 5.5
40.9 ± 6.4
75% APTES + 25% HSPSA
75A + 25H
0.75
0.25
58 ± 2
0.2 ± 0.04
51.6 ± 2.6
77.7 ± 4.7
32.8 ± 4.4
50% APTES + 50% HSPSA
50A + 50H
0.5
0.5
58 ± 2
0.23 ± 0.03
56.4 ± 2.4
70 ± 3.6
39.8 ± 6.3
25% APTES + 75% HSPSA
25A + 75H
0.25
0.75
58 ± 2
0.17 ± 0.04
54.9 ± 1.7
69.9 ± 5.7
33.3 ± 5.6
100% HSPSA
100H
0
1
58 ± 2
0.19 ± 0.01
57.7 ± 3.1
64.2 ± 7.2
36.1 ± 4
Particle Characterization
For characterization, dispersions
of FFSNPs were obtained by ultrasonication using an ultrasound horn
(Sonifier 450, Branson, Germany) at an ultrasound frequency of 20
kHz, with two ultrasound pulses of 150 W/s for 15 min. Scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) images of FFSNPs were taken with a Supra 40 (Carl
Zeiss, Germany) operated at 2.00 kV. No conductive coating was deposited
on the particles. STEM images were recorded using a Titan 80–300
ST microscope (FEI, Eindhoven, The Netherlands). FFSNPs were deposited
onto a carbon-coated copper grid (PLANO GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) by
carefully shaking to leave only a small deposit.Fluorescence
spectra of FFSNPs aqueous suspensions (0.05 vol %) were recorded using
a LS 50 spectrometer (PerkinElmer, Germany). The slit widths for excitation
and emission were 10 and 5 nm, respectively. Fluorescence microscopy
of FFSNPs and cells after in vitro tests was performed with an AX-10
fluorescence microscope (Zeiss, Germany) using three fluorescence
channels, including FS02 for 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
(DAPI) (λex: 300–400 nm; λem: >420 nm), FS09 for Alexa Fluor 488 phalloidin (AF488) (λex: 450–490 nm; λem: >515 nm), and
FS15 (λex: 535–558 nm; λem: >590 nm) for rhodamine B isothiocyanate (RBITC).Nitrogen
adsorption on the surface was measured to calculate the specific surface
area according to the method of Brunauer et al. (BET).[33] Measurement of the adsorption isotherms as well
as calculation of the specific surface areas was performed with a
BELSORP-mini (BEL Japan Inc., Osaka, Japan) and the accompanying software
(BELMaster). Samples were vacuum-dried at <0.5 mbar and 120 °C
for 2 h prior to measurement.The hydrophilic/hydrophobic properties
of the synthesized FFSNPs were determined by volumetric vapor adsorption
studies of polar (water) and nonpolar (n-heptane)
gases at a temperature of 22 °C in a BELSORP 18-3 (Bel Inc.,
Japan). Prior to the adsorption measurements, all NPs were outgassed
for 24 h at 100 °C under argon.Zeta potential measurements
of FFSNPs dispersions were carried out in different media, including
ddH2O, 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) dissolved in ddH2O (H2O + BSA (1%)), Dulbecco/Vogt modified Eagle’s
minimal essential medium (DMEM) containing 1% antibiotic-antimycotic
(AB/AM) (DMEM + AB/AM (1%)), and DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal
calf serum (FCS) and 1% AB/AM (DMEM + FCS (10%) + AB/AM (1%)). The
dispersions of FFSNPs (5 × 10–4 vol %) were
prepared, and their zeta potential was determined 0.5 h after preparation
using the Delsa Nano C photospectrometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA).
The average values and standard deviations given were obtained from
three replicates.For measurement of BSA adsorption, the dispersions
of FFSNPs in H2O + BSA (1%) were incubated at 37 °C
for 0.5, 2, 4, or 6 h. To quantify the amount of adsorbed BSA after
each incubation time interval, FFSNP–protein conjugates were
separated by centrifugation for 10 min at 20 000g and the supernatants were centrifuged again for 10 min at 20 000g. The concentrations of BSA in the supernatants were determined
with the BCA assay according to the supplier’s instructions
and using a multiscan GO spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Finland).
The averages and standard deviations of data from three independent
measurements are given.The particle sizes of the five synthesized
FFSNPs were measured using DLS with the Delsa Nano C photospectrometer.
To determine the effects of surface charge and presence of serum proteins
on colloidal stability, triplicate measurements of hydrodynamic size
were acquired from the dispersions of FFSNPs (5 × 10–4 vol %) in H2O, H2O + BSA (1%), DMEM + AB/AM
(1%), and DMEM + FCS (10%) + AB/AM (1%) 0.5, 2, 4, or 6 h after preparation.
The polydispersity index (PDI) of the colloidal particles in the different
media was calculated on the basis of the cumulative analysis of the
light scattering data, which was performed automatically by the DLS
instrument. The average sizes, d50, and
standard deviations were obtained from three independent measurements.
The four time points were selected to allow comparison to the respective
conditions of in vitro experiments.
Cell
Culture Experiments
Cell Culturing
Cell culture experiments were performed with HOB cells as described
in Holthaus et al.[34] Briefly, cells (4th
passage) were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated
FCS and 1% AB/AM in an incubator (C200, Labotect Labor-Technik-Göttingen,
Germany) at 37 °C with 10% CO2 and 95% relative humidity
(RH). Cells were cultured in cell culture flasks (75 cm2) for up for 1 week, and the medium was renewed every 2 days. HOBs
were trypsinized and dispersed in either DMEM + AB/AM (1%) or DMEM
+ FCS (10%) + AB/AM (1%) for cell experiments without and with serum,
respectively. HOBs were seeded at a density of 3 × 104 cells in 800 μL of medium onto 15 mmØ Thermanox coverslips
(NUNC, Fischer Scientific, Germany) placed in wells of 24-well polystyrene
multidishes (NUNC, Fischer Scientific, Germany) and incubated at 37
°C with 10% CO2 and 95% RH. After 1 h, 100 μL
dispersions containing 0.5 and 1 mg FFSNPs/mL in DMEM + AB/AM (1%)
or DMEM + FCS (10%) + AB/AM (1%) were freshly prepared and added to
the cell culture medium in each well to establish a final particle
concentration of 50 and 100 μg/mL, respectively, and cells were
incubated for 0.5, 2, 4, or 6 h. As control, HOB cells were incubated
in the absence of FFSNPs. Incubations for longer than 6 h were not
performed, as the cell viability for the serum-free incubation conditions
were compromised under those conditions even in the absence of FFSNPs
(data not shown).
Cell Staining and Imaging
After exposure to FFSNPs, the HOB cells were rinsed twice with
phosphate buffered saline (PBS) buffer to remove noninternalized NPs,
fixed with paraformaldehyde (PFA), and fluorescently stained with
DAPI for the cell nuclei and with AF488 for actin cytoskeletons. FFSNPs
uptake and internalization within the cells were analyzed using an
AX-10 fluorescence microscope (Zeiss, Germany).Cellular localization
of FFSNPs in lysosomes was investigated by coincubation with LysoTracker.
To avoid possible autofluorescence of Thermanox coverslips in the
lysosomal colocalization experiments, HOB cells were cultured on glass
coverslips (lot. no. 0983, VWR, Germany). As explained above, the
cells were exposed to the FFSNPs at a concentration of 50 or 100 μg/mL,
followed by a 1 h incubation with LysoTracker (75 nM) in the given
incubation media. Thereafter, the cells were washed twice with PBS
and fixed with PFA. Cell actin cytoskeleton was stained with AF488.
The applied LysoTracker is a blue fluorescent dye that stains the
acidic lysosomes. Hence, cellular colocalization of the RBITC labeled
silica NPs (red fluoresce) with LysoTracker will yield a magenta overlap
in merged images.
Quantification of Cellular
Uptake of FFSNPs
To estimate cellular association of FFSNPs,
after each sampling point, the HOBs were trypsinized and washed with
PBS (three times with a centrifugation each time at 600g for 5 min). Subsequently, the cell pellet was resuspended in PBS
and analyzed by fluorimetry in black well plates (Greiner Bio-One,
Germany) using a microplate reader (Chameleon, HIDEX, Turku, Finland)
at the excitation wavelength of 544 and emission of 590 nm. Data are
expressed as fluorescence intensity units after subtracting background
(cells without NPs) and normalized to the fluorescence intensity of
the applied FFSNPs dispersions.
Determination
of Cell Viability
Cell viability was evaluated using a colorimetric
water-soluble tetrazolium salt (WST-1) cell proliferation assay. After
a given incubation period, 100 μL of WST-1 cell proliferation
reagent was added to the culture wells and the cells were incubated
for 2 h at 37 °C with 10% CO2 and 95% RH. Thereafter,
the cell medium was harvested and centrifuged at 20 000g for 5 min to remove the FFSNPs. Formazan produced and
released by living cells was quantified spectrometrically using a
multiscan GO spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Finland) at 450
nm with a reference wavelength of 650 nm. An identical volume of culture
medium and reagent WST-1, which had not been in contact with the cells,
was used in the experiment as a blank.The cellular and extracellular
activity of the cytosolic enzyme lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was quantified
using the Pierce assay according to the supplier’s instruction.
After each time interval, the media were collected from each well
and centrifuged at 20 000g for 5 min to remove
the NPs before measurement of extracellular LDH. For quantification
of cellular LDH, the cells were rinsed with PBS buffer, detached with
trypsin/ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution, and centrifuged
at 600g for 10 min to separate the cell pellet from
the supernatant. Afterward, the lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100 in 0.9%
NaCl) was added to the cell pellet and mixed until a clear solution
was obtained. 50 μL of media or cell lysates was used in the
assay, and the absorbance at 490 nm with a reference wavelength of
680 nm was measured using the above-mentioned spectrophotometer. LDH
release as indicator for damaged cells was calculated by dividing
the measured amount of extracellular LDH activity by the total LDH
activity (medium plus lysate).
Inhibition
of Endocytosis
In order to discriminate between possible
endocytosis pathways of FFSNPs in HOB cells, their uptake was quantified
in the presence or absence of the endocytosis inhibitors, chlorpromazine
(30 μM), wortmannin (300 nM), or nystatin (10 μM), after
2 h of exposure. In addition, cells were incubated at 4 °C with
FFSNPs for 2 h to study the possible temperature-dependent inhibition
of cellular FFSNP accumulation. Subsequently, the cellular content
of particles was analyzed by fluorimetry of cell pellets as described
above. The data are given as a percentage of the respective FFSNP-treated
cells at 37 °C, with DMSO and without inhibitors (control).
Statistical Analysis
The results
assessed by BCA, WST-1, and LDH assays as well as the values derived
from cellular uptake experiments are given as mean ± standard
deviation of three independently performed experiments. The statistical
analysis was performed using the software Minitab 16 (Minitab Inc.,
Pennsylvania). The data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance
(ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s method for multiple comparisons. p-values below 0.05 were considered to be statistically
significant.
Results
Table 1 summarizes the properties of the synthesized FFSNPs
and lists the molar ratios of amino and sulfonate groups, diameter
defined by SEM micrographs, PDI obtained by DLS, and specific surface
area measured by BET as well as the adsorption of water vapor and n-heptane. The values determined for the specific surface
area differ only slightly between the type of surface functionalization
as the lowest and highest specific surface areas were measured for
100A (48.7 ± 3.3 m2/g) and for 100H (57.7 ± 3.1
m2/g), respectively.To quantify the effect of surface
functionalization with various ratios of amino and sulfonate groups
on the hydrophilic/hydrophobic properties of silica, the adsorption
isotherms of polar water vapor and nonpolar n-heptane
on the FFSNPs were measured (Table 1). No significant
difference between the results obtained for the five FFSNPs was observed,
suggesting the similar hydrophilicity of the synthesized FFSNPs, irrespective
of the ratio of the introduced amino and sulfonate functional groups.This table lists the five types of FFSNPs analyzed with their short
notation, the molar ratios of APTES and HSPSA used for the synthesis,
the diameter assessed from SEM images, the polydispersity index (PDI)
obtained from DLS measurements in H2O, and the specific
surface area as well as the adsorption capacity of water vapor and n-heptane. The data represent means ± SD of three independent
measurements.SEM and STEM analysis revealed that all types of FFSNPs synthesized
are of spherical shape and show a narrow size distribution (Figure 1a) with a mean diameter of 58 nm (Table 1). The fluorescent emission spectra of the FFSNPs
were measured at the excitation wavelength of RBITC (550 nm) and are
shown in Figure 1b. All FFSNPs presented a
well distinct fluorescence signal at the emission wavelength of RBITC.
This was further confirmed by fluorescence microscopy, which indicated
that all FFSNPs feature bright fluorescence.
Figure 1
SEM and STEM (insets)
micrographs of FFSNPs (a) and fluorescence emission spectra of FFSNPs
aqueous suspensions at 550 nm excitation and fluorescence microscopy
micrographs (b). Scale bars are 200 nm, 10 nm, and 20 μm in
all SEM, STEM, and fluorescence microscopy images, respectively.
SEM and STEM (insets)
micrographs of FFSNPs (a) and fluorescence emission spectra of FFSNPs
aqueous suspensions at 550 nm excitation and fluorescence microscopy
micrographs (b). Scale bars are 200 nm, 10 nm, and 20 μm in
all SEM, STEM, and fluorescence microscopy images, respectively.The zeta potential values of the
synthesized FFSNPs in aqueous dispersions varied greatly over a broad
range from 33.4 ± 4.5 to −53.7 ± 3.5 mV (Figure 2a). By variation of the surface charge via single-
and multifunctionalization, two cationic (100A and 75A + 25H), one
almost neutral (50A + 50H), and two anionic silica NPs (25A + 75H
and 100H) were synthesized. An analogous variation of surface charge
was observed for the FFSNP dispersions prepared in DMEM + AB/AM (1%)
which ranged between 23.2 ± 2.9 and −25.4 ± 3.8 mV.
DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS is commonly used as a cell culture
medium for in vitro studies. Therefore, the zeta potentials of FFSNPs
were also measured for dispersions in DMEM + FCS (10%) + AB/AM (1%).
In serum-containing medium, all the FFSNPs had acquired a negatively
charged surface (−12.5 ± 3.5 to −18.8 ± 3.4
mV). Due to the complexity of serum-supplemented medium, we selected
BSA as a model protein and measured zeta potential of FFSNPs in H2O + BSA (1%), as BSA is the most abundant protein found in
plasma and in NP protein corona.[35,36] The concentration
of BSA (1%) was chosen, as it is equivalent to the total protein concentration
present in the 10% FCS.[37] Negative zeta
potential values (−21.3 ± 1.6 to −27.9 ± 2.8
mV) were obtained from FFSNP dispersions prepared in H2O + BSA (1%), regardless of the original surface charges of the NPs.
Figure 2
Physicochemical properties of FFSNPs in
different media. The zeta potential (a) of FFSNPs in the given media
was measured 0.5 h after preparation. Panel (b) shows the amount of
adsorbed BSA (normalized to the specific surface area) determined
for FFSNPs which had been dispersed in H2O containing 1%
BSA for 0.5, 2, 4, or 6 h at 37 °C. Panels (c–f) show
the average hydrodynamic diameters of FFSNPs as a function of time
in the indicated media, demonstrating colloidal stability or instability.
In (b), asterisks (∗) show a significant difference in BSA
adsorption (p < 0.05) for each particle between
different incubation times. Sedimentation or severe aggregation of
FFSNPs, corresponding to DH larger than
550 nm or PDI > 0.3, are indicated by X in panels (c, e).
The amount of BSA adsorbed on the FFSNPs was measured after incubation
for 0.5, 2, 4, or 6 h at 37 °C. For all incubation times, the
two cationic FFSNPs (100A and 75A + 25H) showed higher BSA adsorption
compared to the particles with neutral and negative charges (Figure 2b). For the cationic FFSNPs, a significant increase
of protein adsorption (p < 0.05) was found after
2 h compared to the 0.5 h incubation period, but thereafter, the amount
of adsorbed BSA remained almost constant. In contrast, for neutral
and anionic NPs, the amount of adsorbed protein had reached almost
maximal values already after 0.5 h and these values did not significantly
change during longer incubation (Figure 2b).The size distributions of FFSNP in freshly prepared aqueous dispersions,
as obtained by DLS, are shown in Figure S1 (Supporting
Information). The colloidal stability of FFSNPs during incubation
in different media was investigated by monitoring the changes in their
hydrodynamic diameter (DH) upon incubation
in the different media, including H2O, H2O +
BSA (1%), DMEM + AB/AM (1%), and DMEM + FCS (10%) + AB/AM (1%) and
at different time points (0, 0.5, 2, 4, or 6 h after preparation)
as shown in Figure 2c–f. FFSNPs dispersions
showing sedimentation or severe aggregation, corresponding to DH larger than 550 nm or PDI higher than 0.3,
were not quantified and are indicated by X (Figure 2c,e). For aqueous suspensions of charged FFSNPs, including
100A, 75A + 25H, 25A + 75H, and 100H, a slight increase of DH was observed with increasing incubation time.
In contrast, neutral particles (50A + 50H) showed significant aggregation
after 2 h in water (Figure 2c). All five FFSNPs
were colloidally stable in H2O + BSA (1%) and DMEM + FCS
(10%) + AB/AM (1%) during an incubation time of up to 6 h (Figure 2d,f). Nevertheless, for all FFSNPs, an increase
of DH was observed in DMEM + AB/AM (1%)
which was particularly strong for neutral FFSNP (50A + 50H), and severe
aggregation and sedimentation were already shown after 0.5 h of incubation
(Figure 2e).Physicochemical properties of FFSNPs in
different media. The zeta potential (a) of FFSNPs in the given media
was measured 0.5 h after preparation. Panel (b) shows the amount of
adsorbed BSA (normalized to the specific surface area) determined
for FFSNPs which had been dispersed in H2O containing 1%
BSA for 0.5, 2, 4, or 6 h at 37 °C. Panels (c–f) show
the average hydrodynamic diameters of FFSNPs as a function of time
in the indicated media, demonstrating colloidal stability or instability.
In (b), asterisks (∗) show a significant difference in BSA
adsorption (p < 0.05) for each particle between
different incubation times. Sedimentation or severe aggregation of
FFSNPs, corresponding to DH larger than
550 nm or PDI > 0.3, are indicated by X in panels (c, e).The uptake of FFSNPs with various
surface charges into HOB cells was studied in the absence and presence
of serum. Particle internalization in HOBs was characterized by fluorescence
microscopy. Results obtained after 0.5 or 6 h of exposure to the FFSNPs
at the final concentration of 100 μg/mL are presented in Figure 3. In all fluorescence microscopy micrographs, actin
cytoskeletons (green) and nuclei (blue) were stained with AF 488 and
DAPI, respectively. RBITC labeled FFSNPs are visible with their typical
red fluorescence. Particle uptake into HOBs was observed for both
serum-free and serum-containing incubation media for all types of
FFSNPs investigated (Figure 3). Fluorescence
microscopic inspection of the treated cultures revealed that for all
conditions investigated more than 90% of the cells contained FFSNPs
(data not shown).
Figure 3
Fluorescence microscopy micrographs of HOB cells incubated
without (a–j) or with (k–t) FCS for 0.5 or 6 h at 37
°C with 100 μg/mL FFSNPs, revealing cellular uptake and
intracellular localization of the particles. In all images, green,
blue, and red fluorescence indicates the actin cytoskeleton, the nuclei,
and FFSNPs, respectively. Scale bars: 50 μm.
Fluorescence microscopy micrographs of HOB cells incubated
without (a–j) or with (k–t) FCS for 0.5 or 6 h at 37
°C with 100 μg/mL FFSNPs, revealing cellular uptake and
intracellular localization of the particles. In all images, green,
blue, and red fluorescence indicates the actin cytoskeleton, the nuclei,
and FFSNPs, respectively. Scale bars: 50 μm.To investigate a potential intracellular colocalization
of FFSNPs with lysosmes, after exposure with FFSNPs for 0.5, 2, 4,
or 6 h, the lysosomes were specifically stained with LysoTracker.
Fluorescence microscopy for FFSNPs, actin cytoskeletons, and lysosomal
components was performed with appropriate specific channels, which
detect the emitted fluorescence light in the red, green, and blue
colors, respectively. Due to similarities in the results for the different
incubation periods investigated, only representative fluorescence
microscopy images for 6 h incubations of the HOBs with FFSNPs (100
μg/mL)
in DMEM + FCS (10%) + AB/AM (1%) are presented (Figure 4). Panels (a–e) show merged images of signals from
the three fluorescence microscope channels. The micrographs in panels
(f–o) reveal the combination of fluorescences originated from
LysoTracker and FFSNPs. In panels (f–j), the stained lysosomes
are shown with their original blue color which merged to magenta in
the overlay with red fluorescing FFSNPs. In order to clarify the overlapping
of both colors and to simplify the image analysis for colocalization
studies, pseudo micrographs were prepared, in which the lysosomes
were shown with pseudo green color allowing the observation of the
colocalization with yellow color (panels k–o). Colocalization
of fluorescences from LysoTracker and NPs (magenta in panels (f–j)
and yellow in panels (k–o)), as indicated by white arrows,
clearly demonstrate the intracellular accumulation of FFSNPs inside
the endolysosome compartment. Fluorescence from the single red channel
denotes FFSNPs in panels (p–t). Analogously, colocalization
studies for all FFSNPs (100 μg/mL) were performed in DMEM +
AB/AM (1%) and representative results for 6 h incubations are presented
in Figure S2, Supporting Information.
Figure 4
Colocalization
of FFSNPs (100 μg/mL) and lysosome after a 6 h incubation in
DMEM + FCS (10%) + AB/AM (1%) at 37 °C. The images in panels
(a–e) represent the merged fluorescence signals recorded in
the green (cytoskeleton), blue (LysoTracker), and red (FFSNPs) channels.
The micrographs in panels (f–o) show the overlay of LysoTracker
and FFSNPs. In (f–j), the LysoTracker is shown with its original
blue fluorescence; therefore, the overlay with FFSNPs is indicated
by a magenta color, whereas in panels (k–o), the LysoTracker
is presented with a pseudo green color, in order to demonstrate the
overlapping with red NPs, which is observable as a yellow color. The
overlays of cellular fluorescences for LysoTracker and FFSNPs, as
indicated by white arrows, demonstrate the accumulation of FFSNPs
inside the endolysosomal compartment. The images in panels (p–t)
present the fluorescence signal from the FFSNPs in the single red
channel. Scale bars: 100 μm.
Colocalization
of FFSNPs (100 μg/mL) and lysosome after a 6 h incubation in
DMEM + FCS (10%) + AB/AM (1%) at 37 °C. The images in panels
(a–e) represent the merged fluorescence signals recorded in
the green (cytoskeleton), blue (LysoTracker), and red (FFSNPs) channels.
The micrographs in panels (f–o) show the overlay of LysoTracker
and FFSNPs. In (f–j), the LysoTracker is shown with its original
blue fluorescence; therefore, the overlay with FFSNPs is indicated
by a magenta color, whereas in panels (k–o), the LysoTracker
is presented with a pseudo green color, in order to demonstrate the
overlapping with red NPs, which is observable as a yellow color. The
overlays of cellular fluorescences for LysoTracker and FFSNPs, as
indicated by white arrows, demonstrate the accumulation of FFSNPs
inside the endolysosomal compartment. The images in panels (p–t)
present the fluorescence signal from the FFSNPs in the single red
channel. Scale bars: 100 μm.Fluorescence microscopy revealed an intracellular presence
of all types of FFSNPs investigated in HOBs after exposure to the
particles in both serum-free and serum-containing incubation media
(Figure 3). As a quantification of particle
uptake from such images will not generate reliable data, uptake of
FFSNPs after application of 50 and 100 μg/mL into HOB cells
was quantified by determining cellular FFSNP fluorescence in a fluorimeter
for the cells harvested after the respective incubations (Figure S3a,b, Supporting Information, and Figure 5a,b). In serum-free medium, the uptake of positively charged
silica NPs (100A and 75A + 25H) was significantly higher than that
of anionic and neutral NPs at all four exposure times (Figure S3a, Supporting Information, and Figure 5a). In contrast, higher amounts of cellular fluorescence were
observed for cells that had been exposed in the presence of serum
to anionic FFSNPs (100H and 25A + 75H) (Figure S3b, Supporting Information, and Figure 5b) compared to the other three types of particles (100A, 75H + 25H
and 50A + 50H). Statistical comparison of the results obtained for
cells exposed to FFSNPs in the absence or presence of FCS (Figure
S3a,b, Supporting Information, and Figure 5a,b) revealed significantly increased (p < 0.05) accumulation of the negatively charged (100H and 25A
+ 75H) and neutral FFSNPs (50A + 50H) in the presence of serum. In
contrast, cellular uptake of the positively charged FFSNPs did not
differ between incubations in the absence or the presence of serum.
In addition, for serum-free conditions, hardly any increase in cellular
FFSNP fluorescence was observed between 0.5 and 6 h of incubation,
regardless of their surface charge (Figure S3a, Supporting Information, and Figure 5a), while in serum-containing medium the cellular fluorescence was
increasing at least between the incubation periods of 0.5 and 2 h
(Figure 5b).
Figure 5
Fluorescence
intensity of cellular FFSNPs after incubation of HOB cells with 100
μg/mL of the FFSNPs for the indicated incubation times in serum-free
(a) or in serum-supplemented medium (b). Cell viability measured by
the WST-1 assay after incubation in medium without (c) or with FCS
(d). The data are given as the percentage of the control (cells incubated
without NPs). Extracellular LDH activity (given as percent of total
LDH in cells and media) released from HOBs after exposure to FFSNPs
in serum-free (e) or serum-containing medium (f). All data are expressed
as mean ± SD of values obtained in three independent experiments.
In (c–f), asterisks (∗) indicate significant differences
compared to the control (p < 0.05).
The viability of HOB cells
after exposure to FFSNPs was assessed using the WST-1 assay and the
LDH release. At a concentration of 50 μg/mL, none of the investigated
FFSNPs caused any significant loss in cell viability compared to control
incubations in media without and with FCS (Figure S3c–f, Supporting Information). However, for some types
of FFSNPs, exposure of HOBs to 100 μg/mL of the FFSNPs compromised
cell viability to a small but significant level (Figure 5c,d). In the absence of serum, only the cationic FFSNPs, but
not the neutral or anionic FFSNPs, lowered the cellular WST-1 reduction
and induced some LDH release (Figure 5c,e).
On the contrary, in serum-containing media, all FFSNPs caused a mild
but significant loss in WST-1 reduction capacity which was accompanied
by an increase in LDH release (Figure 5d,f).Fluorescence
intensity of cellular FFSNPs after incubation of HOB cells with 100
μg/mL of the FFSNPs for the indicated incubation times in serum-free
(a) or in serum-supplemented medium (b). Cell viability measured by
the WST-1 assay after incubation in medium without (c) or with FCS
(d). The data are given as the percentage of the control (cells incubated
without NPs). Extracellular LDH activity (given as percent of total
LDH in cells and media) released from HOBs after exposure to FFSNPs
in serum-free (e) or serum-containing medium (f). All data are expressed
as mean ± SD of values obtained in three independent experiments.
In (c–f), asterisks (∗) indicate significant differences
compared to the control (p < 0.05).In order to analyze the mechanism of cellular uptake
of FFSNPs into HOB, inhibitors of different endocytotic pathways were
applied (Figure 6). The inhibitor concentrations
used were defined in preliminary experiments and represent the highest
concentrations which did not significantly compromise cell viability
within a 2 h treatment in both serum-free and serum-containing medium
(data not shown). Incubation of HOB cells at 4 °C neither altered
WST-1 reduction capacity nor led to higher LDH leakage compared to
controls (data not shown) but drastically prevented the cellular accumulation
of FFSNPs (Figure 6). In the presence of chlorpromazine,
a specific clathrin-mediated endocytosis inhibitor,[38] the cellular uptake of all FFSNPs was lowered in comparison
to the respective controls independent of the type of medium applied.
However, in the presence of serum, the inhibitory effect of chlorpromazine
on cellular uptake was stronger for anionic FFSNP (p < 0.01) in comparison to cationic and neutral FFSNPs (p < 0.05). When HOB cells were exposed to wortmannin,
a macropinocytosis inhibitor,[38] no inhibitory
effect on the uptake of FFSNPs was observed in serum-free medium,
while the cellular accumulation of FFSNPs was lowered in the presence
of wortmannin in serum-containing medium. In contrast, nystatin, an
inhibitor of caveolin-dependent endocytosis,[38] did not affect the uptake of FFSNPs (Figure 6).
Figure 6
Uptake of FFSNPs (100 μg/mL) into HOB cells after a 2 h exposure
at 4 or 37 °C in the absence or at 37 °C in the presence
of the endocytosis inhibitors, chlorpromazine (30 μM), wortmannin
(300 nM), or nystatin (10 μM) in serum-free (a) or serum-containing
medium (b). The amount of cellular particles was quantified by fluorimetry
of cell pellets. The data are expressed as means ± SD of three
independent experiments and are given as a percentage of the respective
FFSNP-treated cells incubated at 37 °C in the presence of the
appropriate concentration of DMSO which was used as solvent for the
inhibitors. Significant differences between the obtained values and
the control are indicated (∗, p < 0.05;
§, p < 0.01; #, p < 0.001).
Uptake of FFSNPs (100 μg/mL) into HOB cells after a 2 h exposure
at 4 or 37 °C in the absence or at 37 °C in the presence
of the endocytosis inhibitors, chlorpromazine (30 μM), wortmannin
(300 nM), or nystatin (10 μM) in serum-free (a) or serum-containing
medium (b). The amount of cellular particles was quantified by fluorimetry
of cell pellets. The data are expressed as means ± SD of three
independent experiments and are given as a percentage of the respective
FFSNP-treated cells incubated at 37 °C in the presence of the
appropriate concentration of DMSO which was used as solvent for the
inhibitors. Significant differences between the obtained values and
the control are indicated (∗, p < 0.05;
§, p < 0.01; #, p < 0.001).
Discussion
The synthesis route of FFSNPs
was based on the water in oil reverse microemulsion. First, hydrolysis
and condensation of TEOS took place to form fluorescently labeled
silica NPs in the presence of the dye RBITS, which was covalently
encapsulated in the silica matrix. Second, controlled single- or simultaneous
multifunctionalization with amino and/or sulfonate groups was performed.
In the applied method, the nanodroplets of water serve as nanoreactors
to synthesis the silica NPs and define the final particle size.[32,39] By keeping the concentration of all components including oil, water,
surfactant, cosurfactant, precursor, dye, and catalyst constant, this
route enabled the synthesis of five types of FFSNPs with identical
value for particle size and similar spherical morphology, which differed
only regarding the introduced functional groups at the surface (Table 1 and Figure 1a). In addition,
by using the same RBITC concentration, particles with similar fluorescence
characteristic were obtained as demonstrated by fluorescence spectroscopy
and microscopy (Figure 1b).FFSNPs were
systematically characterized by zeta potential measurements and DLS
analysis in various media. The zeta potential values determined for
water dispersions confirmed that NP surface charge was varied from
positive to negative by modulating the concentrations of two surface
functionalities in the synthesis (Table 1).
The measured zeta potential values of FFSNPs in H2O correlated
to the nature of chemical modification. Particularly, positive zeta
potential values were measured for 100A and 75A + 25H due to the dominant
presence of amino groups, whereas 100H and 25A + 75 H showed negative
surface charge due to the presence of high numbers of sulfonate groups
on their surface.Our results demonstrate that the zeta potential
values depended strongly on the composition of the medium, in which
FFSNPs dispersions were prepared and measured. While the variation
of the FFSNP surface charge was strong in H2O and DMEM
+ AB/AM (1%), all FFSNPs acquired similar zeta potentials upon transfer
into protein-containing media consistent to other reports.[36,40] In fact, when the NPs were dispersed in H2O, the zeta
potential depended exclusively on the molecular species introduced
and their surface properties. In contrast, after dispersions in protein-containing
media, cationic and anionic FFSNPs became a net anionic surface charge.
This
suggests that under these conditions adsorption of proteins and formation
of a protein corona takes place, regardless of the initial surface
charge of the FFSNPs, as reported previously for a variety of NPs.[21,37,41,42] The zeta potential of FFSNPs determined for protein-containing media
is likely to reflect the zeta potential of serum proteins, mainly
that of serum albumin.[21,43]The amount of adsorbed
BSA onto FFSNPs can be correlated to the zeta potential of the particles
(Figure 2b). Positively charged FFSNPs adsorbed
more BSA compared to the anionic and neutral ones. This observation
is in agreement with literature data[35,44] and is consistent
with electrostatic interactions as a primary driving force of BSA
adsorption onto silica. On the other hand, although the quantification
of protein adsorption was carried out in water, in which BSA with
an isoelectric point (IEP) of 4.7 features negative charge,[45] protein adsorption was also observed for anionic
FFSNPs. This behavior suggests that other forces rather than electrostatic
interactions are also involved in the observed BSA adsorption.[35,46]DLS analysis revealed slow time-dependent aggregation for
aqueous dispersions of both cationic and anionic FFSNPs, while almost
neutral particle (50A + 50H) aggregated strongly already within 2
h as these NPs have an IEP similar to the pH value of water (Figure 2a). Also for FFSNPs dispersed in serum-free culture
medium, rapid aggregation or partial precipitation was observed (Figure 2e). Such a particle aggregation in serum-free medium
is most likely caused by the high electrolyte content which reduces
the electrostatic repulsion.[47] In addition,
immediately after preparation, the DH of
all FFSNPs in protein-containing media was slightly larger than that
in pure water (Figure 2c,d,f), which is consistent
with the formation of a protein corona around the NPs.[48] Small differences between the colloidal stability
of the five investigated FFSNPs in one type of protein-containing
medium can be explained by the different initial DH which depends on the initial surface charge and particularly
on the IEP. Depending on the surface charge of FFSNPs, different types
of proteins may adsorb[40,49] and/or a different amount of
protein may form the corona, as our results from BSA-containing medium
suggest (Figure 2b). Besides the type and the
amount of proteins adsorbed onto the NPs surface, their conformation
depends also on the surface charge.[50] Furthermore,
previous studies suggested that the protein corona is highly dynamic
with a composition that changes over time due to continuous protein
association and dissociation.[20,22]Compared to protein-free
media, the protein corona formed in both FCS- and BSA-containing media
prevents the aggregation of silica NPs, regardless of their initial
surface charge (Figure 2d,f), consistent with
the view that protein corona formation enhances the colloidal stability
and prevents aggregation due to steric stabilization.[43,48,51] However, another study reported
that the presence of serum proteins induces instability,[52] demonstrating that the aggregation behavior
of NPs in cell culture media and its correlation with the formation
of a protein corona remains an important issue which has to be separately
addressed for each type of NPs and for each experimental cell culture
system.
Cell Culture Experiments
The effect
of surface charge-dependent cellular internalization of FFSNPs into
HOB cells was studied for serum-free and serum-containing media. Fluorescence
microscopy images of the cells after exposure to FFSNPs demonstrated
that irrespective of surface charge and composition of medium, all
investigated FFSNPs were taken up into the HOB cells and were found
to be distributed within the cells as discrete spots (Figure 3). Moreover, colocalization studies with LysoTracker
revealed that for all conditions applied FFSNPs were localized in
the endolysosomal compartment (Figure 4f–o
and Figure S2f–o, Supporting Information), irrespective of the zeta potential of the FFSNPs. This observation
suggests that endocytotic processes are involved in the uptake of
all investigated types of FFSNPs into HOB cells, consistent with results
obtained by other groups on the uptake of silica NPs in different
cell lines.[53]Presence or absence
of serum has been reported to strongly affect the uptake and possible
toxicity of silica NPs.[53−57,52,58] However, for the conditions used in this study, at best, little
impairment of cell viability was observed as determined by two independent
viability assays (Figure 5c–f). In serum-free
medium, only the cationic FFSNPs compromised to a small extent cell
viability but not the neutral or anionic ones which is consistent
with a higher amount of internalized NPs observed after exposure to
the cationic FFSNPs (Figure 5c,e). In contrast,
in serum-containing media, all FFSNPs caused some adverse effects
on the cells which did not depend on the level of accumulated NPs
(Figure 5d,f). Further studies and other experimental
conditions are required to investigate in more detail the toxic potential
of the synthesized FFSNPs.Determining the fluorescence signals
originated from internalized FFSNPs in HOB cells allowed one to quantify
the uptake of the FFSNPs under various conditions for incubations
of up to 6 h. In the absence of serum, the positively charged FFSNPs
were accumulated into the HOB cells more strongly than negative ones
which was accompanied by a mild toxic effect of the positively charged
FFSNPs (Figure S3a, Supporting Information, and Figure 5a). As electrostatic interactions
are considered as an important factor to determine NP–cell
interaction,[59,60] the stronger accumulation of
positive FFSNPs is likely to be initiated by binding to the large
negatively charged domains which are present at the cell surface.[61] The observed internalization of negatively charged
FFSNPs could involve adsorption to the few cationic sites on the cell
surface.[35,59] Cellular uptake of anionic NPs is considered
to be less efficient compared to cationic NPs,[62] which was confirmed by our data for serum-free conditions.
However, for serum-containing media, we (Figure S3b, Supporting Information, and Figure 5b) and other groups[35,59] demonstrated that anionic NPs
are more efficiently accumulated by cells, which is likely to be caused
by the presence of a protein corona around the NPs which defines their
interactions with cells.[63,19] Anionic and cationic
NPs adsorb different proteins from their surrounding medium[64] which will affect their surface properties and
thereby also their cellular uptake. For example, the positive zeta
potential of FFSNPs supported BSA adsorption (Figure 2b) but led to a lower internalization of the respective NPs
by HOB cells (Figure S3b, Supporting Information, and Figure 5b). This is consistent with
literature data showing that BSA precoated NPs are taken up less efficiently
than uncoated ones.[27]Protein corona
formation has been reported to decrease NP uptake as a consequence
of serum presence[57] while other studies
contradicted these results and demonstrate increased cellular NP uptake
in serum-containing medium.[65] These controversial
findings were attributed to different NP properties[21,37] as well as the use of different types of cells.[36] For the conditions and FFSNPs studied here, it can be concluded
that the presence of serum proteins enhanced the uptake of negatively
charged and neutral FFSNPs, while in the case of cationic FFSNPs hardly
any differences were observed for incubations without or with serum.
Our results suggest also that differences in colloidal stability of
the particles in the absence of serum or an increase in particle size
due to corona formation in the presence of serum could contribute
to the controversial data reported, most likely as both processes
increase particle size which is broadly accepted as a determining
factor for bionano interactions.[66]Microscopic images as well as the quantification of cellular fluorescence
of FFSNP-treated HOB cells revealed that already large amounts of
fluorescent particles had been taken up within 30 min. During longer
incubation times, no further accumulation of NPs was observed in serum-free
medium while in the presence of serum almost maximal amounts of cellular
FFSNPs were observed after 2 h of incubation. A possible reason for
this observation could be that the high tendency of FFSNPs to aggregate
in serum-free medium could drastically decrease the efficiency of
HOB cells for internalization of such particles over time. Alternatively,
different mechanisms for cellular binding and uptake of anionic and
cationic NPs in the presence and absence of serum may contribute to
the observed outcomes.[23] For all FFSNPs,
temperature-dependent uptake into HOB cells was observed by quantitative
analysis of cellular FFSNPs (Figure 6) and
by fluorescence microscopy (data not shown), which revealed that hardly
any particle had been accumulated at 4 °C in the cells. This
drastic inhibition of FFSNPs uptake into HOB cells at 4 °C is
most likely attributed to the impairment of cellular energy metabolism,
which diminishes energy-dependent endocytosis.[67,68]Indeed, endocytosis appears to be involved in the uptake of
FFSNPs into HOB cells. At least chlorpromazine, which is an inhibitor
of clathrin-mediated endocytosis,[38] significantly
lowered FFSNP accumulation in both the absence or the presence of
serum, which is consistent with literature data on the clathrin-dependent
uptake of silica particles into human mesenchymal stem cells.[69,70] In serum-containing medium, the uptake of FFSNPs was also lowered
by the macropinocytosis inhibitor wortmannin,[38] suggesting that in HOB cells in the presence of serum both clathrin-dependent
endocytosis and macropinocytosis contribute to FFSNP uptake. In contrast,
caveolin-dependent processes appear not to be involved as nystatin,
an inhibitor of such endocytotic processes,[38] did not affect FFSNP accumulation. Under the conditions used, none
of the applied inhibitors was able to completely prevent FFSNP accumulation,
suggesting that other mechanisms are involved in the internalization
of FFSNPs into HOB cells. Further studies are needed to address in
more detail the cellular uptake and the potential involvement of endocytotic
pathways in the cellular internalization of silica particles with
different types of surface charge.
Conclusion
Fluorescent silica NPs with a narrow size distribution were prepared
and single or multifunctionalized by introducing amino and sulfonate
groups, allowing the successful adjustment of the zeta potential from
highly positive to highly negative, while other properties of the
NPs were kept almost constant. The protein corona formed around FFSNPs
upon transfer into protein-containing media neutralizes the zeta potential
values and stabilizes the particles against agglomeration.Our
results underline the importance and relevant role of the surface
charge of NPs and the composition of the medium for interactions of
NPs with cells. HOB cells internalized anionic and cationic silica
NPs with opposite trends in serum-free and serum-containing cell culture
media. A positive surface charge of silica NPs was favorable for uptake
by osteoblasts in the absence of serum, while in serum-supplemented
medium as a consequence of protein corona formation, anionic silica
NPs were internalized by HOB cells with higher efficiency. Different
endocytosis pathways may be responsible for the differences observed
for the accumulation of silica NPs in the absence or presence of serum.
The results shown confirm that surface functionalization of silica
NPs can be successfully exploited to control cellular interactions
and NP uptake. Our results suggest that, for physiological conditions
in the presence of serum proteins, sulfonate dominant functionalized
silica NP should be applied to achieve a high level of cellular uptake.
In contrast, for application of silica NPs to cells for mechanistic
studies in serum-free conditions in vitro as well as for direct tissue
applications in vivo, which avoid contact of silica NP to blood and
serum proteins, accelerated cellular uptake could be expected for
amino-functionalized NPs. We anticipate that the results of our in
vitro experiments using FFSNPs are of interest for future studies
aimed to optimize the design of NPs to better control cellular uptake
and cell responses.
Authors: Byoungjin Kim; Gang Han; Bhushan J Toley; Chae-Kyu Kim; Vincent M Rotello; Neil S Forbes Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2010-04-11 Impact factor: 39.213
Authors: Jie Lu; Monty Liong; Sean Sherman; Tian Xia; Michael Kovochich; Andre E Nel; Jeffrey I Zink; Fuyuhiko Tamanoi Journal: Nanobiotechnology Date: 2007-05-01
Authors: Anna Salvati; Andrzej S Pitek; Marco P Monopoli; Kanlaya Prapainop; Francesca Baldelli Bombelli; Delyan R Hristov; Philip M Kelly; Christoffer Åberg; Eugene Mahon; Kenneth A Dawson Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2013-01-20 Impact factor: 39.213
Authors: Rustem R Zairov; Alexey P Dovzhenko; Anastasiia S Sapunova; Alexandra D Voloshina; Kirill A Sarkanich; Amina G Daminova; Irek R Nizameev; Dmitry V Lapaev; Svetlana N Sudakova; Sergey N Podyachev; Konstantin A Petrov; Alberto Vomiero; Asiya R Mustafina Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-11-25 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Aleksandr A Goncharenko; Ilya A Tarasyuk; Yuriy S Marfin; Kirill V Grzhegorzhevskii; Albert R Muslimov; Andrey B Bondarenko; Maxim D Lebedev; Ilya A Kuz'min; Artur S Vashurin; Kirill V Lepik; Alexander S Timin; Evgeniy V Rumyantsev Journal: Molecules Date: 2020-08-21 Impact factor: 4.411