Literature DB >> 26030263

Polyethylene Wear in Knee Arthroplasty.

Rajit Chakravarty1, Randa D K Elmallah1, Jeffrey Jai Cherian1, Steven M Kurtz2, Michael A Mont1.   

Abstract

Polyethylene (PE) wear and osteolysis are common causes for late revisions of knee arthroplasties. Several implant and surgical factors have been implicated in contributing to the development of wear, such as type of bearing surface used, inaccurate articular geometry, and poor knee kinematics. In addition, patient-related factors, such as younger age and higher activity levels, may also contribute to wear. Our purpose was to evaluate and compare the effect of these variables on wear rates following knee arthroplasty. Recently, technological advancements have been aimed at reducing the incidence of wear by improving the PE manufacturing process, creating implants that minimize contact stresses, and refining our surgical techniques. Furthermore, the development of newer highly cross-linked PEs (HXLPEs) and the introduction of additives, such as vitamin E, to the PEs may improve overall implant survivorship. As a result, with the advent of newer implant and PE designs, wear is no longer the most common cause of early failure, though it remains an important factor in limiting long-term implant survivorship. However, there are a few clinical studies evaluating the long-term outcomes of newer HXLPEs and implant designs, with further evaluations necessary to determine the best implant-PE combination for improved knee arthroplasty survivorship. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26030263     DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1551833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Knee Surg        ISSN: 1538-8506            Impact factor:   2.757


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Importance of the tibial slope in knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  Silvan Wittenberg; Ufuk Sentuerk; Lisa Renner; Claude Weynandt; Carsten F Perka; Clemens Gwinner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  The choice of the femoral center of rotation affects material loss in total knee replacement wear testing - A parametric finite element study of ISO 14243-3.

Authors:  Steven P Mell; Markus A Wimmer; Hannah J Lundberg
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  High Reoperation Rate in Mobile-Bearing Total Ankle Arthroplasty in Young Patients.

Authors:  Christian Stadler; Matthias Luger; Stella Stevoska; Manuel Gahleitner; Lorenz Pisecky; Tobias Gotterbarm; Antonio Klasan; Matthias C Klotz
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 2.430

4.  CMM-Based Volumetric Assessment Methodology for Polyethylene Tibial Knee Inserts in Total Knee Replacement.

Authors:  Wei Jiang; Cuicui Ji; Zhongmin Jin; Yuntian Dai
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 1.781

Review 5.  Lower limb joint repair and replacement: an overview.

Authors:  Rocco Aicale; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-12-19

6.  The Causal Relationship Between Rheumatoid Arthritis and Mechanical Complications of Prosthesis After Arthroplasty: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.

Authors:  Yuanqing Cai; Guangyang Zhang; Jialin Liang; Zhaopu Jing; Rupeng Zhang; Leifeng Lv; Xiaoqian Dang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Early aseptic loosening of a mobile-bearing total knee replacement.

Authors:  Ines Kutzner; Geir Hallan; Paul Johan Høl; Ove Furnes; Øystein Gøthesen; Wender Figved; Peter Ellison
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.717

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.