Rahmi Gokhan Ekin1, Ilker Akarken2, Ferruh Zorlu1, Huseyin Tarhan1, Ulku Kucuk3, Zubeyde Yildirim3, Rauf Taner Divrik4. 1. Tepecik Teaching and Research Hospital, Department of Urology, Turkey; 2. Kemalpasa State Hospital, Urology Clinic, Turkey; 3. Tepecik Teaching and Research Hospital, Department of Pathology, Turkey; 4. Department of Urology, Sifa University, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) need adjuvant intravesical treatment after surgery. Although bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) is highly effective, new adjuvant treatments to decrease recurrences and toxicity have been studies. We performed a retrospective propensity score-matched study to compare the efficacy of BCG and chemohyperthermia (C-HT). METHODS: We included 1937 patients diagnosed with bladder cancer between January 2004 and January 2014. The primary efficacy endpoint was recurrence-free interval. Patients treated with C-HT were matched with patients treated with BCG using propensity score-matched analysis. Cox-regression models were used to estimate the association between intravesical treatments and the presence of recurrence and progression. RESULTS: Of the 710 patients treated with intravesical treatments, 40 and 142 were eligible for inclusion in C-HT and BCG groups, respectively. Following case matching, there were no differences in patient or tumour characteristics between treatment groups. The 2-year recurrence-free interval in C-HT and BCG groups were 76.2% and 93.9%, respectively (p = 0.020). C-HT treatment (hazard ratio [HR] 5.42; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-26.43; p = 0.036) and high-grade tumour (HR 4.60; 95% CI 1.01-20.88; p = 0.048) are associated with an elevated odds of tumour recurrence. In multivariate Cox-regression analysis, there was no significant difference between C-HT and BCG in the odds of recurrence (p = 0.054). There were no differences in progression between C-HT and BCG. CONCLUSION: C-HT is not as effective treatment as BCG in high-risk NMIBC patients who are BCG-naive. Although, there were no significant difference in the odds of recurrence, recurrence-free interval is significantly improved by the administration of BCG.
INTRODUCTION:Patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) need adjuvant intravesical treatment after surgery. Although bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) is highly effective, new adjuvant treatments to decrease recurrences and toxicity have been studies. We performed a retrospective propensity score-matched study to compare the efficacy of BCG and chemohyperthermia (C-HT). METHODS: We included 1937 patients diagnosed with bladder cancer between January 2004 and January 2014. The primary efficacy endpoint was recurrence-free interval. Patients treated with C-HT were matched with patients treated with BCG using propensity score-matched analysis. Cox-regression models were used to estimate the association between intravesical treatments and the presence of recurrence and progression. RESULTS: Of the 710 patients treated with intravesical treatments, 40 and 142 were eligible for inclusion in C-HT and BCG groups, respectively. Following case matching, there were no differences in patient or tumour characteristics between treatment groups. The 2-year recurrence-free interval in C-HT and BCG groups were 76.2% and 93.9%, respectively (p = 0.020). C-HT treatment (hazard ratio [HR] 5.42; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-26.43; p = 0.036) and high-grade tumour (HR 4.60; 95% CI 1.01-20.88; p = 0.048) are associated with an elevated odds of tumour recurrence. In multivariate Cox-regression analysis, there was no significant difference between C-HT and BCG in the odds of recurrence (p = 0.054). There were no differences in progression between C-HT and BCG. CONCLUSION: C-HT is not as effective treatment as BCG in high-risk NMIBC patients who are BCG-naive. Although, there were no significant difference in the odds of recurrence, recurrence-free interval is significantly improved by the administration of BCG.
Authors: Maximilian Burger; James W F Catto; Guido Dalbagni; H Barton Grossman; Harry Herr; Pierre Karakiewicz; Wassim Kassouf; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Carlo La Vecchia; Shahrokh Shariat; Yair Lotan Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2012-07-25 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Marko Babjuk; Maximilian Burger; Richard Zigeuner; Shahrokh F Shariat; Bas W G van Rhijn; Eva Compérat; Richard J Sylvester; Eero Kaasinen; Andreas Böhle; Joan Palou Redorta; Morgan Rouprêt Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2013-06-12 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Richard J Sylvester; Adrian P M van der Meijden; Willem Oosterlinck; J Alfred Witjes; Christian Bouffioux; Louis Denis; Donald W W Newling; Karlheinz Kurth Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2006-01-17 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Per-Uno Malmström; Richard J Sylvester; David E Crawford; Martin Friedrich; Susanne Krege; Erkki Rintala; Eduardo Solsona; Savino M Di Stasi; J Alfred Witjes Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2009-04-24 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Jesus Fernandez-Gomez; Rosario Madero; Eduardo Solsona; Miguel Unda; Luis Martinez-Piñeiro; Marcelino Gonzalez; Jose Portillo; Antonio Ojea; Carlos Pertusa; Jesus Rodriguez-Molina; Jose Emilio Camacho; Mariano Rabadan; Ander Astobieta; Manuel Montesinos; Santiago Isorna; Pedro Muntañola; Anabel Gimeno; Miguel Blas; Jose Antonio Martinez-Piñeiro Journal: J Urol Date: 2009-09-16 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Maurizio Brausi; Jorg Oddens; Richard Sylvester; Aldo Bono; Cees van de Beek; George van Andel; Paolo Gontero; Levent Turkeri; Sandrine Marreaud; Sandra Collette; Willem Oosterlinck Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2013-07-24 Impact factor: 20.096